Cargando…

Plasma acylcarnitine and diabetic retinopathy: A study from Eastern China

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acylcarnitines (ACars) are important for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, their roles in diabetic retinopathy (DR) remain controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of ACars with DR and their values in DR detection. METHODS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Dongzhen, Zhao, Shuzhen, Li, Huihui, Xia, Zhezheng, Che, Mingzhu, Huang, Ruogu, Lai, Mengyuan, Wang, Yanan, Zhang, Zejie, Wang, Hui, Zuo, Jingjing, Zheng, Chao, Mao, Guangyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387885
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.977428
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acylcarnitines (ACars) are important for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, their roles in diabetic retinopathy (DR) remain controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of ACars with DR and their values in DR detection. METHODS: This was a two-center case-control study based on the propensity score matching approach between August 2017 to June 2018 in Eastern China. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to estimate the association of plasma ACars with DR. Differential ACars were screened by models of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, elastic net, and weighted quantile sum regression, and their roles in DR identification were further evaluated by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS: Eight of twenty plasma ACars (8:0, 12:0, 12:1, 14:1, 16:2, 18:0, 18:2 and 18:3) were associated with DR, while only ACar 8:0 was selected by three variable selection methods. As compared to those with the 1(st) tertile of ACar 8:0, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of DR were 0.22 (0.08, 0.59) and 0.12 (0.04, 0.36) for subjects in the 2(nd) and 3(rd) tertiles, respectively (P for trend < 0.001). Consistent associations were also observed in both restricted cubic spline regression models and subgroup analyses. AUC (95% CI) were 0.74 (0.66, 0.82) for ACar 8:0 alone and 0.77 (0.70, 0.85) for ACar 8:0 combined with covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest higher ACar 8:0 is significantly associated with a decreased risk of DR, which provides a unique window for early identification of DR.