Cargando…

Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND: Although the sentinel lymph node technique in endometrial cancer is currently replacing pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy for the evaluation of lymph node status in endometrial cancer, its performance is not yet standardized. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the detection rates an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorostidi, Mikel, Ruiz, Ruben, Galan, Claudia, Jaunarena, Ibon, Cobas, Paloma, Lekuona, Arantxa, Diez-Itza, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100120
_version_ 1784827284368130048
author Gorostidi, Mikel
Ruiz, Ruben
Galan, Claudia
Jaunarena, Ibon
Cobas, Paloma
Lekuona, Arantxa
Diez-Itza, Irene
author_facet Gorostidi, Mikel
Ruiz, Ruben
Galan, Claudia
Jaunarena, Ibon
Cobas, Paloma
Lekuona, Arantxa
Diez-Itza, Irene
author_sort Gorostidi, Mikel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the sentinel lymph node technique in endometrial cancer is currently replacing pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy for the evaluation of lymph node status in endometrial cancer, its performance is not yet standardized. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the detection rates and locations of aortic sentinel lymph node detection after dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection in patients with endometrial cancer, using the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches. STUDY DESIGN: Between June 26, 2014 and December 31, 2019, 278 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer at our institution. In all cases, we performed sentinel lymph node biopsy with dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection, and back-up lymphadenectomy in high-risk cases. A post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate differences between the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approach to aortic sentinel lymph nodes. RESULTS: The detection rates were as follows: overall detection rate: 93.2% (259/278); pelvic detection rate: 90.3% (251/278); bilateral pelvic detection rate: 68.0% (189/278); aortic detection rate: 66.9% (186/278); and isolated aortic detection rate: 2.88% (8/278). Transperitoneal and extraperitoneal aortic detection rates were similar (65.0% and 69.6%, respectively), with no significant differences (P=.441). Isolated aortic metastases were similar in both groups (2% vs 4.7%, respectively; P=.185). The laterality of aortic sentinel lymph node detection was influenced by the surgical approach (P=.002), but not its location above or below the inferior mesenteric artery (P=.166 and P=.556, respectively). CONCLUSION: The detection rates at the aortic level were similar between the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches, with no impact on subsequent pelvic detection. The transperitoneal approach detected more laterocaval, precaval, and interaortocaval nodes, whereas the extraperitoneal approach detected more preaortic and left lateroaortic nodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9646988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96469882022-11-15 Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer Gorostidi, Mikel Ruiz, Ruben Galan, Claudia Jaunarena, Ibon Cobas, Paloma Lekuona, Arantxa Diez-Itza, Irene AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Although the sentinel lymph node technique in endometrial cancer is currently replacing pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy for the evaluation of lymph node status in endometrial cancer, its performance is not yet standardized. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the detection rates and locations of aortic sentinel lymph node detection after dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection in patients with endometrial cancer, using the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches. STUDY DESIGN: Between June 26, 2014 and December 31, 2019, 278 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer at our institution. In all cases, we performed sentinel lymph node biopsy with dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection, and back-up lymphadenectomy in high-risk cases. A post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate differences between the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approach to aortic sentinel lymph nodes. RESULTS: The detection rates were as follows: overall detection rate: 93.2% (259/278); pelvic detection rate: 90.3% (251/278); bilateral pelvic detection rate: 68.0% (189/278); aortic detection rate: 66.9% (186/278); and isolated aortic detection rate: 2.88% (8/278). Transperitoneal and extraperitoneal aortic detection rates were similar (65.0% and 69.6%, respectively), with no significant differences (P=.441). Isolated aortic metastases were similar in both groups (2% vs 4.7%, respectively; P=.185). The laterality of aortic sentinel lymph node detection was influenced by the surgical approach (P=.002), but not its location above or below the inferior mesenteric artery (P=.166 and P=.556, respectively). CONCLUSION: The detection rates at the aortic level were similar between the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches, with no impact on subsequent pelvic detection. The transperitoneal approach detected more laterocaval, precaval, and interaortocaval nodes, whereas the extraperitoneal approach detected more preaortic and left lateroaortic nodes. Elsevier 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9646988/ /pubmed/36387296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100120 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gorostidi, Mikel
Ruiz, Ruben
Galan, Claudia
Jaunarena, Ibon
Cobas, Paloma
Lekuona, Arantxa
Diez-Itza, Irene
Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer
title Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer
title_full Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer
title_fullStr Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer
title_full_unstemmed Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer
title_short Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer
title_sort transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100120
work_keys_str_mv AT gorostidimikel transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer
AT ruizruben transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer
AT galanclaudia transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer
AT jaunarenaibon transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer
AT cobaspaloma transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer
AT lekuonaarantxa transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer
AT diezitzairene transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer