Cargando…
Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer
BACKGROUND: Although the sentinel lymph node technique in endometrial cancer is currently replacing pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy for the evaluation of lymph node status in endometrial cancer, its performance is not yet standardized. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the detection rates an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100120 |
_version_ | 1784827284368130048 |
---|---|
author | Gorostidi, Mikel Ruiz, Ruben Galan, Claudia Jaunarena, Ibon Cobas, Paloma Lekuona, Arantxa Diez-Itza, Irene |
author_facet | Gorostidi, Mikel Ruiz, Ruben Galan, Claudia Jaunarena, Ibon Cobas, Paloma Lekuona, Arantxa Diez-Itza, Irene |
author_sort | Gorostidi, Mikel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although the sentinel lymph node technique in endometrial cancer is currently replacing pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy for the evaluation of lymph node status in endometrial cancer, its performance is not yet standardized. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the detection rates and locations of aortic sentinel lymph node detection after dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection in patients with endometrial cancer, using the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches. STUDY DESIGN: Between June 26, 2014 and December 31, 2019, 278 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer at our institution. In all cases, we performed sentinel lymph node biopsy with dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection, and back-up lymphadenectomy in high-risk cases. A post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate differences between the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approach to aortic sentinel lymph nodes. RESULTS: The detection rates were as follows: overall detection rate: 93.2% (259/278); pelvic detection rate: 90.3% (251/278); bilateral pelvic detection rate: 68.0% (189/278); aortic detection rate: 66.9% (186/278); and isolated aortic detection rate: 2.88% (8/278). Transperitoneal and extraperitoneal aortic detection rates were similar (65.0% and 69.6%, respectively), with no significant differences (P=.441). Isolated aortic metastases were similar in both groups (2% vs 4.7%, respectively; P=.185). The laterality of aortic sentinel lymph node detection was influenced by the surgical approach (P=.002), but not its location above or below the inferior mesenteric artery (P=.166 and P=.556, respectively). CONCLUSION: The detection rates at the aortic level were similar between the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches, with no impact on subsequent pelvic detection. The transperitoneal approach detected more laterocaval, precaval, and interaortocaval nodes, whereas the extraperitoneal approach detected more preaortic and left lateroaortic nodes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9646988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96469882022-11-15 Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer Gorostidi, Mikel Ruiz, Ruben Galan, Claudia Jaunarena, Ibon Cobas, Paloma Lekuona, Arantxa Diez-Itza, Irene AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Although the sentinel lymph node technique in endometrial cancer is currently replacing pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy for the evaluation of lymph node status in endometrial cancer, its performance is not yet standardized. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the detection rates and locations of aortic sentinel lymph node detection after dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection in patients with endometrial cancer, using the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches. STUDY DESIGN: Between June 26, 2014 and December 31, 2019, 278 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer at our institution. In all cases, we performed sentinel lymph node biopsy with dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection, and back-up lymphadenectomy in high-risk cases. A post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate differences between the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approach to aortic sentinel lymph nodes. RESULTS: The detection rates were as follows: overall detection rate: 93.2% (259/278); pelvic detection rate: 90.3% (251/278); bilateral pelvic detection rate: 68.0% (189/278); aortic detection rate: 66.9% (186/278); and isolated aortic detection rate: 2.88% (8/278). Transperitoneal and extraperitoneal aortic detection rates were similar (65.0% and 69.6%, respectively), with no significant differences (P=.441). Isolated aortic metastases were similar in both groups (2% vs 4.7%, respectively; P=.185). The laterality of aortic sentinel lymph node detection was influenced by the surgical approach (P=.002), but not its location above or below the inferior mesenteric artery (P=.166 and P=.556, respectively). CONCLUSION: The detection rates at the aortic level were similar between the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches, with no impact on subsequent pelvic detection. The transperitoneal approach detected more laterocaval, precaval, and interaortocaval nodes, whereas the extraperitoneal approach detected more preaortic and left lateroaortic nodes. Elsevier 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9646988/ /pubmed/36387296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100120 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gorostidi, Mikel Ruiz, Ruben Galan, Claudia Jaunarena, Ibon Cobas, Paloma Lekuona, Arantxa Diez-Itza, Irene Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer |
title | Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer |
title_full | Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer |
title_fullStr | Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer |
title_short | Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer |
title_sort | transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gorostidimikel transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer AT ruizruben transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer AT galanclaudia transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer AT jaunarenaibon transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer AT cobaspaloma transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer AT lekuonaarantxa transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer AT diezitzairene transperitonealvsextraperitonealapproachforaorticsentinelnodedetectioninendometrialcancer |