Cargando…
Methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel EEG
The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) has been traditionally recorded with few electrodes and is often measured as the voltage difference between mastoid and vertex electrodes (vertical montage). As high-density EEG recording systems have gained popularity, multi-channel analysis methods have be...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36386860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100061 |
_version_ | 1784827328892764160 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Hao Mehta, Anahita H. Oxenham, Andrew J. |
author_facet | Lu, Hao Mehta, Anahita H. Oxenham, Andrew J. |
author_sort | Lu, Hao |
collection | PubMed |
description | The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) has been traditionally recorded with few electrodes and is often measured as the voltage difference between mastoid and vertex electrodes (vertical montage). As high-density EEG recording systems have gained popularity, multi-channel analysis methods have been developed to integrate the ASSR signal across channels. The phases of ASSR across electrodes can be affected by factors including the stimulus modulation rate and re-referencing strategy, which will in turn affect the estimated ASSR strength. To explore the relationship between the classical vertical-montage ASSR and whole-scalp ASSR, we applied these two techniques to the same data to estimate the strength of ASSRs evoked by tones with sinusoidal amplitude modulation rates of around 40, 100, and 200 Hz. The whole-scalp methods evaluated in our study, with either linked-mastoid or common-average reference, included ones that assume equal phase across all channels, as well as ones that allow for different phase relationships. The performance of simple averaging was compared to that of more complex methods involving principal component analysis. Overall, the root-mean-square of the phase locking values (PLVs) across all channels provided the most efficient method to detect ASSR across the range of modulation rates tested here. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9647176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96471762022-11-15 Methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel EEG Lu, Hao Mehta, Anahita H. Oxenham, Andrew J. Curr Res Neurobiol Research Article The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) has been traditionally recorded with few electrodes and is often measured as the voltage difference between mastoid and vertex electrodes (vertical montage). As high-density EEG recording systems have gained popularity, multi-channel analysis methods have been developed to integrate the ASSR signal across channels. The phases of ASSR across electrodes can be affected by factors including the stimulus modulation rate and re-referencing strategy, which will in turn affect the estimated ASSR strength. To explore the relationship between the classical vertical-montage ASSR and whole-scalp ASSR, we applied these two techniques to the same data to estimate the strength of ASSRs evoked by tones with sinusoidal amplitude modulation rates of around 40, 100, and 200 Hz. The whole-scalp methods evaluated in our study, with either linked-mastoid or common-average reference, included ones that assume equal phase across all channels, as well as ones that allow for different phase relationships. The performance of simple averaging was compared to that of more complex methods involving principal component analysis. Overall, the root-mean-square of the phase locking values (PLVs) across all channels provided the most efficient method to detect ASSR across the range of modulation rates tested here. Elsevier 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9647176/ /pubmed/36386860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100061 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lu, Hao Mehta, Anahita H. Oxenham, Andrew J. Methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel EEG |
title | Methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel EEG |
title_full | Methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel EEG |
title_fullStr | Methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel EEG |
title_full_unstemmed | Methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel EEG |
title_short | Methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel EEG |
title_sort | methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel eeg |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36386860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luhao methodologicalconsiderationswhenmeasuringandanalyzingauditorysteadystateresponseswithmultichanneleeg AT mehtaanahitah methodologicalconsiderationswhenmeasuringandanalyzingauditorysteadystateresponseswithmultichanneleeg AT oxenhamandrewj methodologicalconsiderationswhenmeasuringandanalyzingauditorysteadystateresponseswithmultichanneleeg |