Cargando…

Differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic pleural disease based on a machine learning model with primary CT signs: A multicentre study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: It is still a challenge to make confirming diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), especially differentiating from metastatic pleural disease (MPD). The aim of this study was to develop a model to distinguish MPM with MPD based on primary CT signs. MATERIALS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ye, Cai, Botao, Wang, Bing, Lv, Yan, He, Wei, Xie, Xiaoxia, Hou, Dailun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11383
_version_ 1784827383684005888
author Li, Ye
Cai, Botao
Wang, Bing
Lv, Yan
He, Wei
Xie, Xiaoxia
Hou, Dailun
author_facet Li, Ye
Cai, Botao
Wang, Bing
Lv, Yan
He, Wei
Xie, Xiaoxia
Hou, Dailun
author_sort Li, Ye
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: It is still a challenge to make confirming diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), especially differentiating from metastatic pleural disease (MPD). The aim of this study was to develop a model to distinguish MPM with MPD based on primary CT signs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively recruited 150 MPM patients and 147 MPD patients from two centers and assigned them to training (115 MPM patients and 113 MPD patients) and testing (35 MPM patients and 34 MPD patients) cohorts. The images were analyzed for pleural thickening, hydrothorax, lymphadenopathy, thoracic volume and calcified pleural plaque (CPP). The selected clinical characteristics and primary CT signs comprised the model by multivariate logistic regression in the training cohort. Then the model was tested on the external testing cohort. ROC curve and F1 score were used to validate the capability of the model in both two cohorts. RESULTS: There were significant differences between two groups: (1) carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA); (2) nodular and mass pleural thickening; (3) the enhancement of pleura; (4) focal, diffuse and circumferential pleural thickening; (5) the thickest pleura; (6) thickening of diaphragmatic pleura; (7) multiple nodules and effusion of interlobar pleura; (8) hilar LN and ring enhancement of LN; (9) punctate and stipe CPP. The AUC and F1 score of the model were 0.970 and 0.857 in the training cohort, 0.955 and 0.818 in the testing cohort. CONCLUSION: The model holds promise for use as a diagnostic tool to distinguish MPM from MPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9647442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96474422022-11-15 Differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic pleural disease based on a machine learning model with primary CT signs: A multicentre study Li, Ye Cai, Botao Wang, Bing Lv, Yan He, Wei Xie, Xiaoxia Hou, Dailun Heliyon Research Article RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: It is still a challenge to make confirming diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), especially differentiating from metastatic pleural disease (MPD). The aim of this study was to develop a model to distinguish MPM with MPD based on primary CT signs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively recruited 150 MPM patients and 147 MPD patients from two centers and assigned them to training (115 MPM patients and 113 MPD patients) and testing (35 MPM patients and 34 MPD patients) cohorts. The images were analyzed for pleural thickening, hydrothorax, lymphadenopathy, thoracic volume and calcified pleural plaque (CPP). The selected clinical characteristics and primary CT signs comprised the model by multivariate logistic regression in the training cohort. Then the model was tested on the external testing cohort. ROC curve and F1 score were used to validate the capability of the model in both two cohorts. RESULTS: There were significant differences between two groups: (1) carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA); (2) nodular and mass pleural thickening; (3) the enhancement of pleura; (4) focal, diffuse and circumferential pleural thickening; (5) the thickest pleura; (6) thickening of diaphragmatic pleura; (7) multiple nodules and effusion of interlobar pleura; (8) hilar LN and ring enhancement of LN; (9) punctate and stipe CPP. The AUC and F1 score of the model were 0.970 and 0.857 in the training cohort, 0.955 and 0.818 in the testing cohort. CONCLUSION: The model holds promise for use as a diagnostic tool to distinguish MPM from MPD. Elsevier 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9647442/ /pubmed/36387542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11383 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Ye
Cai, Botao
Wang, Bing
Lv, Yan
He, Wei
Xie, Xiaoxia
Hou, Dailun
Differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic pleural disease based on a machine learning model with primary CT signs: A multicentre study
title Differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic pleural disease based on a machine learning model with primary CT signs: A multicentre study
title_full Differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic pleural disease based on a machine learning model with primary CT signs: A multicentre study
title_fullStr Differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic pleural disease based on a machine learning model with primary CT signs: A multicentre study
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic pleural disease based on a machine learning model with primary CT signs: A multicentre study
title_short Differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic pleural disease based on a machine learning model with primary CT signs: A multicentre study
title_sort differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic pleural disease based on a machine learning model with primary ct signs: a multicentre study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11383
work_keys_str_mv AT liye differentiatingmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaandmetastaticpleuraldiseasebasedonamachinelearningmodelwithprimaryctsignsamulticentrestudy
AT caibotao differentiatingmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaandmetastaticpleuraldiseasebasedonamachinelearningmodelwithprimaryctsignsamulticentrestudy
AT wangbing differentiatingmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaandmetastaticpleuraldiseasebasedonamachinelearningmodelwithprimaryctsignsamulticentrestudy
AT lvyan differentiatingmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaandmetastaticpleuraldiseasebasedonamachinelearningmodelwithprimaryctsignsamulticentrestudy
AT hewei differentiatingmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaandmetastaticpleuraldiseasebasedonamachinelearningmodelwithprimaryctsignsamulticentrestudy
AT xiexiaoxia differentiatingmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaandmetastaticpleuraldiseasebasedonamachinelearningmodelwithprimaryctsignsamulticentrestudy
AT houdailun differentiatingmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaandmetastaticpleuraldiseasebasedonamachinelearningmodelwithprimaryctsignsamulticentrestudy