Cargando…
Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard
The use of patient-facing online symptom checkers (OSCs) has expanded in recent years, but their accuracy, safety, and impact on patient behaviors and health care systems remain unclear. The lack of a standardized process of clinical evaluation has resulted in significant variation in approaches to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287594 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37408 |
_version_ | 1784827386413449216 |
---|---|
author | Painter, Annabelle Hayhoe, Benedict Riboli-Sasco, Eva El-Osta, Austen |
author_facet | Painter, Annabelle Hayhoe, Benedict Riboli-Sasco, Eva El-Osta, Austen |
author_sort | Painter, Annabelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of patient-facing online symptom checkers (OSCs) has expanded in recent years, but their accuracy, safety, and impact on patient behaviors and health care systems remain unclear. The lack of a standardized process of clinical evaluation has resulted in significant variation in approaches to OSC validation and evaluation. The aim of this paper is to characterize a set of congruent requirements for a standardized vignette-based clinical evaluation process of OSCs. Discrepancies in the findings of comparative studies to date suggest that different steps in OSC evaluation methodology can significantly influence outcomes. A standardized process with a clear specification for vignette-based clinical evaluation is urgently needed to guide developers and facilitate the objective comparison of OSCs. We propose 15 recommendation requirements for an OSC evaluation standard. A third-party evaluation process and protocols for prospective real-world evidence studies should also be prioritized to quality assure OSC assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9647454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96474542022-11-15 Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard Painter, Annabelle Hayhoe, Benedict Riboli-Sasco, Eva El-Osta, Austen J Med Internet Res Viewpoint The use of patient-facing online symptom checkers (OSCs) has expanded in recent years, but their accuracy, safety, and impact on patient behaviors and health care systems remain unclear. The lack of a standardized process of clinical evaluation has resulted in significant variation in approaches to OSC validation and evaluation. The aim of this paper is to characterize a set of congruent requirements for a standardized vignette-based clinical evaluation process of OSCs. Discrepancies in the findings of comparative studies to date suggest that different steps in OSC evaluation methodology can significantly influence outcomes. A standardized process with a clear specification for vignette-based clinical evaluation is urgently needed to guide developers and facilitate the objective comparison of OSCs. We propose 15 recommendation requirements for an OSC evaluation standard. A third-party evaluation process and protocols for prospective real-world evidence studies should also be prioritized to quality assure OSC assessment. JMIR Publications 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9647454/ /pubmed/36287594 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37408 Text en ©Annabelle Painter, Benedict Hayhoe, Eva Riboli-Sasco, Austen El-Osta. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 26.10.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Painter, Annabelle Hayhoe, Benedict Riboli-Sasco, Eva El-Osta, Austen Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard |
title | Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard |
title_full | Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard |
title_fullStr | Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard |
title_full_unstemmed | Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard |
title_short | Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard |
title_sort | online symptom checkers: recommendations for a vignette-based clinical evaluation standard |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287594 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT painterannabelle onlinesymptomcheckersrecommendationsforavignettebasedclinicalevaluationstandard AT hayhoebenedict onlinesymptomcheckersrecommendationsforavignettebasedclinicalevaluationstandard AT ribolisascoeva onlinesymptomcheckersrecommendationsforavignettebasedclinicalevaluationstandard AT elostaausten onlinesymptomcheckersrecommendationsforavignettebasedclinicalevaluationstandard |