Cargando…

Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard

The use of patient-facing online symptom checkers (OSCs) has expanded in recent years, but their accuracy, safety, and impact on patient behaviors and health care systems remain unclear. The lack of a standardized process of clinical evaluation has resulted in significant variation in approaches to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Painter, Annabelle, Hayhoe, Benedict, Riboli-Sasco, Eva, El-Osta, Austen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287594
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37408
_version_ 1784827386413449216
author Painter, Annabelle
Hayhoe, Benedict
Riboli-Sasco, Eva
El-Osta, Austen
author_facet Painter, Annabelle
Hayhoe, Benedict
Riboli-Sasco, Eva
El-Osta, Austen
author_sort Painter, Annabelle
collection PubMed
description The use of patient-facing online symptom checkers (OSCs) has expanded in recent years, but their accuracy, safety, and impact on patient behaviors and health care systems remain unclear. The lack of a standardized process of clinical evaluation has resulted in significant variation in approaches to OSC validation and evaluation. The aim of this paper is to characterize a set of congruent requirements for a standardized vignette-based clinical evaluation process of OSCs. Discrepancies in the findings of comparative studies to date suggest that different steps in OSC evaluation methodology can significantly influence outcomes. A standardized process with a clear specification for vignette-based clinical evaluation is urgently needed to guide developers and facilitate the objective comparison of OSCs. We propose 15 recommendation requirements for an OSC evaluation standard. A third-party evaluation process and protocols for prospective real-world evidence studies should also be prioritized to quality assure OSC assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9647454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96474542022-11-15 Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard Painter, Annabelle Hayhoe, Benedict Riboli-Sasco, Eva El-Osta, Austen J Med Internet Res Viewpoint The use of patient-facing online symptom checkers (OSCs) has expanded in recent years, but their accuracy, safety, and impact on patient behaviors and health care systems remain unclear. The lack of a standardized process of clinical evaluation has resulted in significant variation in approaches to OSC validation and evaluation. The aim of this paper is to characterize a set of congruent requirements for a standardized vignette-based clinical evaluation process of OSCs. Discrepancies in the findings of comparative studies to date suggest that different steps in OSC evaluation methodology can significantly influence outcomes. A standardized process with a clear specification for vignette-based clinical evaluation is urgently needed to guide developers and facilitate the objective comparison of OSCs. We propose 15 recommendation requirements for an OSC evaluation standard. A third-party evaluation process and protocols for prospective real-world evidence studies should also be prioritized to quality assure OSC assessment. JMIR Publications 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9647454/ /pubmed/36287594 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37408 Text en ©Annabelle Painter, Benedict Hayhoe, Eva Riboli-Sasco, Austen El-Osta. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 26.10.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Painter, Annabelle
Hayhoe, Benedict
Riboli-Sasco, Eva
El-Osta, Austen
Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard
title Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard
title_full Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard
title_fullStr Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard
title_full_unstemmed Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard
title_short Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard
title_sort online symptom checkers: recommendations for a vignette-based clinical evaluation standard
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287594
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37408
work_keys_str_mv AT painterannabelle onlinesymptomcheckersrecommendationsforavignettebasedclinicalevaluationstandard
AT hayhoebenedict onlinesymptomcheckersrecommendationsforavignettebasedclinicalevaluationstandard
AT ribolisascoeva onlinesymptomcheckersrecommendationsforavignettebasedclinicalevaluationstandard
AT elostaausten onlinesymptomcheckersrecommendationsforavignettebasedclinicalevaluationstandard