Cargando…
Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the prevalence of vertebral fractures (VF) in middle-aged and elderly Chinese men and women and explored the differences in lumbar spine volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) derived from quantitative CT (QCT) between those with a grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1013597 |
_version_ | 1784827417007751168 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yandong Yu, Aihong Li, Kai Wang, Ling Huang, Pengju Geng, Jian Zhang, Yong Duanmu, Yang-yang Blake, Glen M. Cheng, Xiaoguang |
author_facet | Liu, Yandong Yu, Aihong Li, Kai Wang, Ling Huang, Pengju Geng, Jian Zhang, Yong Duanmu, Yang-yang Blake, Glen M. Cheng, Xiaoguang |
author_sort | Liu, Yandong |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study evaluated the prevalence of vertebral fractures (VF) in middle-aged and elderly Chinese men and women and explored the differences in lumbar spine volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) derived from quantitative CT (QCT) between those with a grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3,457 participants were enrolled in the China Action on Spine and Hip Status (CASH) study and had upper abdominal CT examinations. Vertebral fractures were identified by Genant’s semi-quantitative method from lateral CT scout views or CT sagittal views. L1-3 vBMD was measured by Mindways QCT Pro v5.0 software. The characteristics of different fracture severity groups were compared using one-way ANOVA, independent-samples t-tests, and Kruskal-Wallis H-tests. RESULTS: 1267 males (aged 62.77 ± 9.20 years) and 2170 females (aged 61.41 ± 9.01 years) were included in the analysis. In men, the prevalence of VF increased from 14.7% at age<50 years to 23.2% at age ≥70 years, and in women from 5.1% at age<50 years to 33.0% at age ≥70 years. Differences in mean age and vBMD were found between the different fracture grade groups. After age stratification, vBMD differences in men aged < 50 years old disappeared (p = 0.162) but remained in the older age bands. There was no significant difference in mean vBMD between those with multiple mild fractures and those with a single mild fracture. CONCLUSION: In women, the prevalence of VF increased rapidly after age 50, while it grew more slowly in men. In general, with the exception of men <50 years old, participants with a grade 1 VF had lower vBMD than non-fractured individuals. The majority of women younger than 50 with a grade 1 VF had normal bone mass. We recommend that a vertebral height reduction ratio of <25% be diagnosed as a deformity rather than a fracture in people under the age of 50. The presence of multiple mild fractured vertebrae does not imply lower BMD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9647629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96476292022-11-15 Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study Liu, Yandong Yu, Aihong Li, Kai Wang, Ling Huang, Pengju Geng, Jian Zhang, Yong Duanmu, Yang-yang Blake, Glen M. Cheng, Xiaoguang Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology PURPOSE: This study evaluated the prevalence of vertebral fractures (VF) in middle-aged and elderly Chinese men and women and explored the differences in lumbar spine volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) derived from quantitative CT (QCT) between those with a grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3,457 participants were enrolled in the China Action on Spine and Hip Status (CASH) study and had upper abdominal CT examinations. Vertebral fractures were identified by Genant’s semi-quantitative method from lateral CT scout views or CT sagittal views. L1-3 vBMD was measured by Mindways QCT Pro v5.0 software. The characteristics of different fracture severity groups were compared using one-way ANOVA, independent-samples t-tests, and Kruskal-Wallis H-tests. RESULTS: 1267 males (aged 62.77 ± 9.20 years) and 2170 females (aged 61.41 ± 9.01 years) were included in the analysis. In men, the prevalence of VF increased from 14.7% at age<50 years to 23.2% at age ≥70 years, and in women from 5.1% at age<50 years to 33.0% at age ≥70 years. Differences in mean age and vBMD were found between the different fracture grade groups. After age stratification, vBMD differences in men aged < 50 years old disappeared (p = 0.162) but remained in the older age bands. There was no significant difference in mean vBMD between those with multiple mild fractures and those with a single mild fracture. CONCLUSION: In women, the prevalence of VF increased rapidly after age 50, while it grew more slowly in men. In general, with the exception of men <50 years old, participants with a grade 1 VF had lower vBMD than non-fractured individuals. The majority of women younger than 50 with a grade 1 VF had normal bone mass. We recommend that a vertebral height reduction ratio of <25% be diagnosed as a deformity rather than a fracture in people under the age of 50. The presence of multiple mild fractured vertebrae does not imply lower BMD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9647629/ /pubmed/36387886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1013597 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Yu, Li, Wang, Huang, Geng, Zhang, Duanmu, Blake and Cheng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Liu, Yandong Yu, Aihong Li, Kai Wang, Ling Huang, Pengju Geng, Jian Zhang, Yong Duanmu, Yang-yang Blake, Glen M. Cheng, Xiaoguang Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study |
title | Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study |
title_full | Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study |
title_fullStr | Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study |
title_short | Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study |
title_sort | differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the china action on spine and hip status study |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1013597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyandong differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy AT yuaihong differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy AT likai differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy AT wangling differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy AT huangpengju differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy AT gengjian differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy AT zhangyong differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy AT duanmuyangyang differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy AT blakeglenm differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy AT chengxiaoguang differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy |