Cargando…

Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the prevalence of vertebral fractures (VF) in middle-aged and elderly Chinese men and women and explored the differences in lumbar spine volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) derived from quantitative CT (QCT) between those with a grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yandong, Yu, Aihong, Li, Kai, Wang, Ling, Huang, Pengju, Geng, Jian, Zhang, Yong, Duanmu, Yang-yang, Blake, Glen M., Cheng, Xiaoguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1013597
_version_ 1784827417007751168
author Liu, Yandong
Yu, Aihong
Li, Kai
Wang, Ling
Huang, Pengju
Geng, Jian
Zhang, Yong
Duanmu, Yang-yang
Blake, Glen M.
Cheng, Xiaoguang
author_facet Liu, Yandong
Yu, Aihong
Li, Kai
Wang, Ling
Huang, Pengju
Geng, Jian
Zhang, Yong
Duanmu, Yang-yang
Blake, Glen M.
Cheng, Xiaoguang
author_sort Liu, Yandong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study evaluated the prevalence of vertebral fractures (VF) in middle-aged and elderly Chinese men and women and explored the differences in lumbar spine volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) derived from quantitative CT (QCT) between those with a grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3,457 participants were enrolled in the China Action on Spine and Hip Status (CASH) study and had upper abdominal CT examinations. Vertebral fractures were identified by Genant’s semi-quantitative method from lateral CT scout views or CT sagittal views. L1-3 vBMD was measured by Mindways QCT Pro v5.0 software. The characteristics of different fracture severity groups were compared using one-way ANOVA, independent-samples t-tests, and Kruskal-Wallis H-tests. RESULTS: 1267 males (aged 62.77 ± 9.20 years) and 2170 females (aged 61.41 ± 9.01 years) were included in the analysis. In men, the prevalence of VF increased from 14.7% at age<50 years to 23.2% at age ≥70 years, and in women from 5.1% at age<50 years to 33.0% at age ≥70 years. Differences in mean age and vBMD were found between the different fracture grade groups. After age stratification, vBMD differences in men aged < 50 years old disappeared (p = 0.162) but remained in the older age bands. There was no significant difference in mean vBMD between those with multiple mild fractures and those with a single mild fracture. CONCLUSION: In women, the prevalence of VF increased rapidly after age 50, while it grew more slowly in men. In general, with the exception of men <50 years old, participants with a grade 1 VF had lower vBMD than non-fractured individuals. The majority of women younger than 50 with a grade 1 VF had normal bone mass. We recommend that a vertebral height reduction ratio of <25% be diagnosed as a deformity rather than a fracture in people under the age of 50. The presence of multiple mild fractured vertebrae does not imply lower BMD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9647629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96476292022-11-15 Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study Liu, Yandong Yu, Aihong Li, Kai Wang, Ling Huang, Pengju Geng, Jian Zhang, Yong Duanmu, Yang-yang Blake, Glen M. Cheng, Xiaoguang Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology PURPOSE: This study evaluated the prevalence of vertebral fractures (VF) in middle-aged and elderly Chinese men and women and explored the differences in lumbar spine volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) derived from quantitative CT (QCT) between those with a grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3,457 participants were enrolled in the China Action on Spine and Hip Status (CASH) study and had upper abdominal CT examinations. Vertebral fractures were identified by Genant’s semi-quantitative method from lateral CT scout views or CT sagittal views. L1-3 vBMD was measured by Mindways QCT Pro v5.0 software. The characteristics of different fracture severity groups were compared using one-way ANOVA, independent-samples t-tests, and Kruskal-Wallis H-tests. RESULTS: 1267 males (aged 62.77 ± 9.20 years) and 2170 females (aged 61.41 ± 9.01 years) were included in the analysis. In men, the prevalence of VF increased from 14.7% at age<50 years to 23.2% at age ≥70 years, and in women from 5.1% at age<50 years to 33.0% at age ≥70 years. Differences in mean age and vBMD were found between the different fracture grade groups. After age stratification, vBMD differences in men aged < 50 years old disappeared (p = 0.162) but remained in the older age bands. There was no significant difference in mean vBMD between those with multiple mild fractures and those with a single mild fracture. CONCLUSION: In women, the prevalence of VF increased rapidly after age 50, while it grew more slowly in men. In general, with the exception of men <50 years old, participants with a grade 1 VF had lower vBMD than non-fractured individuals. The majority of women younger than 50 with a grade 1 VF had normal bone mass. We recommend that a vertebral height reduction ratio of <25% be diagnosed as a deformity rather than a fracture in people under the age of 50. The presence of multiple mild fractured vertebrae does not imply lower BMD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9647629/ /pubmed/36387886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1013597 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Yu, Li, Wang, Huang, Geng, Zhang, Duanmu, Blake and Cheng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Liu, Yandong
Yu, Aihong
Li, Kai
Wang, Ling
Huang, Pengju
Geng, Jian
Zhang, Yong
Duanmu, Yang-yang
Blake, Glen M.
Cheng, Xiaoguang
Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study
title Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study
title_full Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study
title_fullStr Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study
title_short Differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the China action on spine and hip status study
title_sort differences in spine volumetric bone mineral density between grade 1 vertebral fracture and non-fractured participants in the china action on spine and hip status study
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1013597
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyandong differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy
AT yuaihong differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy
AT likai differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy
AT wangling differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy
AT huangpengju differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy
AT gengjian differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy
AT zhangyong differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy
AT duanmuyangyang differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy
AT blakeglenm differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy
AT chengxiaoguang differencesinspinevolumetricbonemineraldensitybetweengrade1vertebralfractureandnonfracturedparticipantsinthechinaactiononspineandhipstatusstudy