Cargando…
Kommentar zu den neuen Leitlinien (2021) der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) zur kardiovaskulären Prävention
The new ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice have introduced a number of new features into the guidelines: 1. The new SCORE2 system was developed based on recent European cohort studies with a total of 677,684 participants, a significant update compared to the old...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647766/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12181-022-00580-2 |
_version_ | 1784827446196961280 |
---|---|
author | Gielen, Stephan Wienbergen, Harm Reibis, Rona Koenig, Wolfgang Weil, Joachim Landmesser, Ulf |
author_facet | Gielen, Stephan Wienbergen, Harm Reibis, Rona Koenig, Wolfgang Weil, Joachim Landmesser, Ulf |
author_sort | Gielen, Stephan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The new ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice have introduced a number of new features into the guidelines: 1. The new SCORE2 system was developed based on recent European cohort studies with a total of 677,684 participants, a significant update compared to the old SCORE system, which was based on studies dating back to the 1970s and 1980s. For the first time SCORE2-OP enables the calculation of the individual risk in people> 69 years of age. SCORE2 also marks a change in the risk definition: instead of mortality risk it now provides an estimate of morbidity and mortality risks for cardiovascular diseases. 2. The thresholds for risk categorization based on SCORE2 are now dynamic with age: below 50 years of age individuals with a SCORE2 risk of ≥ 7.5% are very high-risk, while those between 50 and 69 years need to surpass ≥ 10% and those ≥ 70 years should be above 15% SCORE2 risk to be classified as very high risk. This change was made to reflect the lifetime exposure, which is greater at a younger age. 3. The novel 2‑step approach separates a general recommendation for prevention for all from the final prevention goals that should be reached in selected patients based on life years gained, comorbidities, frailty and patient wishes. There is a certain danger that this may dilute the prevention goals because many patients and physicians may not go beyond step 1. Not all effects of the new SCORE2 system and the readjusted risk thresholds have yet become clear. A close monitoring of how the new guidelines affect the number of patients in whom, e.g. statin treatment is recommended, is warranted in the different risk regions. Additionally, the freedom of choice with respect to prevention intensity remains a potential threat to optimal guideline implementation. Therefore, implementation studies are needed to continue the virtuous cycle of guideline development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9647766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96477662022-11-14 Kommentar zu den neuen Leitlinien (2021) der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) zur kardiovaskulären Prävention Gielen, Stephan Wienbergen, Harm Reibis, Rona Koenig, Wolfgang Weil, Joachim Landmesser, Ulf Kardiologie Leitlinien The new ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice have introduced a number of new features into the guidelines: 1. The new SCORE2 system was developed based on recent European cohort studies with a total of 677,684 participants, a significant update compared to the old SCORE system, which was based on studies dating back to the 1970s and 1980s. For the first time SCORE2-OP enables the calculation of the individual risk in people> 69 years of age. SCORE2 also marks a change in the risk definition: instead of mortality risk it now provides an estimate of morbidity and mortality risks for cardiovascular diseases. 2. The thresholds for risk categorization based on SCORE2 are now dynamic with age: below 50 years of age individuals with a SCORE2 risk of ≥ 7.5% are very high-risk, while those between 50 and 69 years need to surpass ≥ 10% and those ≥ 70 years should be above 15% SCORE2 risk to be classified as very high risk. This change was made to reflect the lifetime exposure, which is greater at a younger age. 3. The novel 2‑step approach separates a general recommendation for prevention for all from the final prevention goals that should be reached in selected patients based on life years gained, comorbidities, frailty and patient wishes. There is a certain danger that this may dilute the prevention goals because many patients and physicians may not go beyond step 1. Not all effects of the new SCORE2 system and the readjusted risk thresholds have yet become clear. A close monitoring of how the new guidelines affect the number of patients in whom, e.g. statin treatment is recommended, is warranted in the different risk regions. Additionally, the freedom of choice with respect to prevention intensity remains a potential threat to optimal guideline implementation. Therefore, implementation studies are needed to continue the virtuous cycle of guideline development. Springer Medizin 2022-11-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9647766/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12181-022-00580-2 Text en © Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie - Herz- und Kreislaufforschung e.V. Published by Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature - all rights reserved 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Leitlinien Gielen, Stephan Wienbergen, Harm Reibis, Rona Koenig, Wolfgang Weil, Joachim Landmesser, Ulf Kommentar zu den neuen Leitlinien (2021) der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) zur kardiovaskulären Prävention |
title | Kommentar zu den neuen Leitlinien (2021) der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) zur kardiovaskulären Prävention |
title_full | Kommentar zu den neuen Leitlinien (2021) der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) zur kardiovaskulären Prävention |
title_fullStr | Kommentar zu den neuen Leitlinien (2021) der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) zur kardiovaskulären Prävention |
title_full_unstemmed | Kommentar zu den neuen Leitlinien (2021) der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) zur kardiovaskulären Prävention |
title_short | Kommentar zu den neuen Leitlinien (2021) der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) zur kardiovaskulären Prävention |
title_sort | kommentar zu den neuen leitlinien (2021) der europäischen gesellschaft für kardiologie (esc) zur kardiovaskulären prävention |
topic | Leitlinien |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647766/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12181-022-00580-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gielenstephan kommentarzudenneuenleitlinien2021dereuropaischengesellschaftfurkardiologieesczurkardiovaskularenpravention AT wienbergenharm kommentarzudenneuenleitlinien2021dereuropaischengesellschaftfurkardiologieesczurkardiovaskularenpravention AT reibisrona kommentarzudenneuenleitlinien2021dereuropaischengesellschaftfurkardiologieesczurkardiovaskularenpravention AT koenigwolfgang kommentarzudenneuenleitlinien2021dereuropaischengesellschaftfurkardiologieesczurkardiovaskularenpravention AT weiljoachim kommentarzudenneuenleitlinien2021dereuropaischengesellschaftfurkardiologieesczurkardiovaskularenpravention AT landmesserulf kommentarzudenneuenleitlinien2021dereuropaischengesellschaftfurkardiologieesczurkardiovaskularenpravention |