Cargando…

Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) serve as an alternative to short-term central venous catheters (CVCs) for providing intravenous access in hospitalized patients. Although a number of studies suggest that PICCs are associated with a lower risk of central line-associa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitiriga, Vassiliki, Bakalis, John, Theodoridou, Kalliopi, Kanellopoulos, Petros, Saroglou, George, Tsakris, Athanasios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01180-1
_version_ 1784827470293237760
author Pitiriga, Vassiliki
Bakalis, John
Theodoridou, Kalliopi
Kanellopoulos, Petros
Saroglou, George
Tsakris, Athanasios
author_facet Pitiriga, Vassiliki
Bakalis, John
Theodoridou, Kalliopi
Kanellopoulos, Petros
Saroglou, George
Tsakris, Athanasios
author_sort Pitiriga, Vassiliki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) serve as an alternative to short-term central venous catheters (CVCs) for providing intravenous access in hospitalized patients. Although a number of studies suggest that PICCs are associated with a lower risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) than CVCs, recent data concerning specific patient groups support the contrary. In this regard, we are comparing CVC- and PICC-related CLABSI rates developed in a selected group of critically ill inpatients and evaluating the CLABSI microbiological distribution. METHODS: The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Greece between May 2017 and May 2019. We performed a two-year retrospective analysis of the data collected from medical records of consecutive adult patients who underwent PICC or CVC placement. RESULTS: A total of 1187 CVCs placed for 9774 catheter-days and 639 PICCs placed for 11,110 catheter-days, were reported and analyzed during the study period. Among CVCs, a total of 59 (4.9%) CLABSIs were identified, while among PICCs, 18 (2.8%) cases presented CLABSI (p = 0.029). The CLABSI incidence rate per 1,000 catheter-days was 6.03 for CVC group and 1.62 for PICC group (p < 0.001). The CLABSI rate due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among the two groups was 3.17 in CVC group and 0.36 in PICC group (p < 0.001). Within CLABSI-CVC group, the most common microorganism detected was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (27.1%) followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (22%). In CLABSI-PICC group, the predominant microorganism was Candida spp. (33.3%) followed by non-MDR gram-negative pathogens (22.2%). CONCLUSIONS: PICC lines were associated with significantly lower CLABSI rates comparing to CVC although they were in place longer than CVC lines. Given their longer time to the development of infection, PICCs may be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient IV access. The high prevalence of CLABSI-MDROs depicts the local microbial ecology, emphasizing the need of public health awareness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9647909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96479092022-11-15 Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients Pitiriga, Vassiliki Bakalis, John Theodoridou, Kalliopi Kanellopoulos, Petros Saroglou, George Tsakris, Athanasios Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) serve as an alternative to short-term central venous catheters (CVCs) for providing intravenous access in hospitalized patients. Although a number of studies suggest that PICCs are associated with a lower risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) than CVCs, recent data concerning specific patient groups support the contrary. In this regard, we are comparing CVC- and PICC-related CLABSI rates developed in a selected group of critically ill inpatients and evaluating the CLABSI microbiological distribution. METHODS: The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Greece between May 2017 and May 2019. We performed a two-year retrospective analysis of the data collected from medical records of consecutive adult patients who underwent PICC or CVC placement. RESULTS: A total of 1187 CVCs placed for 9774 catheter-days and 639 PICCs placed for 11,110 catheter-days, were reported and analyzed during the study period. Among CVCs, a total of 59 (4.9%) CLABSIs were identified, while among PICCs, 18 (2.8%) cases presented CLABSI (p = 0.029). The CLABSI incidence rate per 1,000 catheter-days was 6.03 for CVC group and 1.62 for PICC group (p < 0.001). The CLABSI rate due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among the two groups was 3.17 in CVC group and 0.36 in PICC group (p < 0.001). Within CLABSI-CVC group, the most common microorganism detected was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (27.1%) followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (22%). In CLABSI-PICC group, the predominant microorganism was Candida spp. (33.3%) followed by non-MDR gram-negative pathogens (22.2%). CONCLUSIONS: PICC lines were associated with significantly lower CLABSI rates comparing to CVC although they were in place longer than CVC lines. Given their longer time to the development of infection, PICCs may be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient IV access. The high prevalence of CLABSI-MDROs depicts the local microbial ecology, emphasizing the need of public health awareness. BioMed Central 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9647909/ /pubmed/36352414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01180-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pitiriga, Vassiliki
Bakalis, John
Theodoridou, Kalliopi
Kanellopoulos, Petros
Saroglou, George
Tsakris, Athanasios
Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients
title Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients
title_full Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients
title_fullStr Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients
title_full_unstemmed Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients
title_short Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients
title_sort lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01180-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pitirigavassiliki lowerriskofbloodstreaminfectionsforperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterscomparedtocentralvenouscathetersincriticallyillpatients
AT bakalisjohn lowerriskofbloodstreaminfectionsforperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterscomparedtocentralvenouscathetersincriticallyillpatients
AT theodoridoukalliopi lowerriskofbloodstreaminfectionsforperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterscomparedtocentralvenouscathetersincriticallyillpatients
AT kanellopoulospetros lowerriskofbloodstreaminfectionsforperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterscomparedtocentralvenouscathetersincriticallyillpatients
AT saroglougeorge lowerriskofbloodstreaminfectionsforperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterscomparedtocentralvenouscathetersincriticallyillpatients
AT tsakrisathanasios lowerriskofbloodstreaminfectionsforperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterscomparedtocentralvenouscathetersincriticallyillpatients