Analysis of Maternal and Infant Death Reporting System (MIDRS) in a North Indian State during 2013–2018

BACKGROUND: Haryana launched the Maternal and Infant Death Reporting System (MIDRS) in 2013 to report deaths and their causes. We evaluated the system in terms of its data quality, accuracy, and timing of reporting. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of data about the maternal, infant, and child deaths from the state level MIDRS portal from 2013 to 2018. The portal combines infant and maternal deaths and stillbirths reported through passive and active surveillance. We used the descriptive measure of statistics (proportion) to describe the characteristics and causes of neonatal, post-neonatal, and maternal deaths. RESULTS: Of 1,18, 028 neonatal deaths, 39% (46,140) neonates died at a government facility. Gender was not recorded in 7,093 (6.0%) deaths. “Others” was a predominant category (14,664, 53%) of death. Of 2,842 maternal deaths, the cause of death was unknown in 465 (16.4%) deaths and mentioned as “others” in 1,618 (56.9%) instances. Nearly 60% of maternal deaths occurred at a health facility. Stillbirth was published as a cause of death in 228 (7.8%) child deaths (1–5 years). Missing data were observed in critical variables such as the timing of maternal mortality (50, 1.8%) and sex of child (4884, 4.3%). CONCLUSION: Delay in reporting, inconsistencies in data, and missing information were some challenges. Ascertainment of the exact cause of death needs to be improved through better training.