Cargando…

Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws?

INTRODUCTION: The available treatment options for patients with drug or treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders are limited. Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (M-ECT) is an established option, but the literature available is limited. This study examined the utilization of M-ECT in a large tert...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christina, Munugapati, Chichra, Abhinav, Kattula, Dheeraj, Innamuri, Raviteja, Akula, Vishal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9648276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387666
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2389_21
_version_ 1784827545194070016
author Christina, Munugapati
Chichra, Abhinav
Kattula, Dheeraj
Innamuri, Raviteja
Akula, Vishal
author_facet Christina, Munugapati
Chichra, Abhinav
Kattula, Dheeraj
Innamuri, Raviteja
Akula, Vishal
author_sort Christina, Munugapati
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The available treatment options for patients with drug or treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders are limited. Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (M-ECT) is an established option, but the literature available is limited. This study examined the utilization of M-ECT in a large tertiary care psychiatric facility, and its correlates with the socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed in a tertiary care psychiatry center based in semi-urban South India, and data was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients received ECT in the study period, of which only five patients were on M-ECT. These patients were diagnosed as treatment-resistant and were mostly suffering from schizophrenia. They were located less than 30 km from the hospital. They were on regular treatment but continued to have residual symptoms without functional recovery and required a high level of support from caregivers. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the effectiveness of M-ECT for the treatment of severe psychiatric disorders and highlights the profile of patients who have received this modality of treatment. It can be suggested with consideration of various psycho-social issues which seem to be related to adherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9648276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96482762022-11-15 Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws? Christina, Munugapati Chichra, Abhinav Kattula, Dheeraj Innamuri, Raviteja Akula, Vishal J Family Med Prim Care Case Series INTRODUCTION: The available treatment options for patients with drug or treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders are limited. Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (M-ECT) is an established option, but the literature available is limited. This study examined the utilization of M-ECT in a large tertiary care psychiatric facility, and its correlates with the socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed in a tertiary care psychiatry center based in semi-urban South India, and data was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients received ECT in the study period, of which only five patients were on M-ECT. These patients were diagnosed as treatment-resistant and were mostly suffering from schizophrenia. They were located less than 30 km from the hospital. They were on regular treatment but continued to have residual symptoms without functional recovery and required a high level of support from caregivers. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the effectiveness of M-ECT for the treatment of severe psychiatric disorders and highlights the profile of patients who have received this modality of treatment. It can be suggested with consideration of various psycho-social issues which seem to be related to adherence. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9648276/ /pubmed/36387666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2389_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Case Series
Christina, Munugapati
Chichra, Abhinav
Kattula, Dheeraj
Innamuri, Raviteja
Akula, Vishal
Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws?
title Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws?
title_full Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws?
title_fullStr Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws?
title_full_unstemmed Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws?
title_short Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws?
title_sort maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: are we clutching at straws?
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9648276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387666
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2389_21
work_keys_str_mv AT christinamunugapati maintenanceelectroconvulsivetherapyareweclutchingatstraws
AT chichraabhinav maintenanceelectroconvulsivetherapyareweclutchingatstraws
AT kattuladheeraj maintenanceelectroconvulsivetherapyareweclutchingatstraws
AT innamuriraviteja maintenanceelectroconvulsivetherapyareweclutchingatstraws
AT akulavishal maintenanceelectroconvulsivetherapyareweclutchingatstraws