Cargando…
Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws?
INTRODUCTION: The available treatment options for patients with drug or treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders are limited. Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (M-ECT) is an established option, but the literature available is limited. This study examined the utilization of M-ECT in a large tert...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9648276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2389_21 |
_version_ | 1784827545194070016 |
---|---|
author | Christina, Munugapati Chichra, Abhinav Kattula, Dheeraj Innamuri, Raviteja Akula, Vishal |
author_facet | Christina, Munugapati Chichra, Abhinav Kattula, Dheeraj Innamuri, Raviteja Akula, Vishal |
author_sort | Christina, Munugapati |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The available treatment options for patients with drug or treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders are limited. Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (M-ECT) is an established option, but the literature available is limited. This study examined the utilization of M-ECT in a large tertiary care psychiatric facility, and its correlates with the socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed in a tertiary care psychiatry center based in semi-urban South India, and data was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients received ECT in the study period, of which only five patients were on M-ECT. These patients were diagnosed as treatment-resistant and were mostly suffering from schizophrenia. They were located less than 30 km from the hospital. They were on regular treatment but continued to have residual symptoms without functional recovery and required a high level of support from caregivers. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the effectiveness of M-ECT for the treatment of severe psychiatric disorders and highlights the profile of patients who have received this modality of treatment. It can be suggested with consideration of various psycho-social issues which seem to be related to adherence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9648276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96482762022-11-15 Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws? Christina, Munugapati Chichra, Abhinav Kattula, Dheeraj Innamuri, Raviteja Akula, Vishal J Family Med Prim Care Case Series INTRODUCTION: The available treatment options for patients with drug or treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders are limited. Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (M-ECT) is an established option, but the literature available is limited. This study examined the utilization of M-ECT in a large tertiary care psychiatric facility, and its correlates with the socio-demographic and clinical profile of patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed in a tertiary care psychiatry center based in semi-urban South India, and data was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients received ECT in the study period, of which only five patients were on M-ECT. These patients were diagnosed as treatment-resistant and were mostly suffering from schizophrenia. They were located less than 30 km from the hospital. They were on regular treatment but continued to have residual symptoms without functional recovery and required a high level of support from caregivers. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the effectiveness of M-ECT for the treatment of severe psychiatric disorders and highlights the profile of patients who have received this modality of treatment. It can be suggested with consideration of various psycho-social issues which seem to be related to adherence. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9648276/ /pubmed/36387666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2389_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Case Series Christina, Munugapati Chichra, Abhinav Kattula, Dheeraj Innamuri, Raviteja Akula, Vishal Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws? |
title | Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws? |
title_full | Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws? |
title_fullStr | Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws? |
title_full_unstemmed | Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws? |
title_short | Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: Are we clutching at straws? |
title_sort | maintenance electroconvulsive therapy: are we clutching at straws? |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9648276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2389_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christinamunugapati maintenanceelectroconvulsivetherapyareweclutchingatstraws AT chichraabhinav maintenanceelectroconvulsivetherapyareweclutchingatstraws AT kattuladheeraj maintenanceelectroconvulsivetherapyareweclutchingatstraws AT innamuriraviteja maintenanceelectroconvulsivetherapyareweclutchingatstraws AT akulavishal maintenanceelectroconvulsivetherapyareweclutchingatstraws |