Cargando…

Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery with the use of patient-specific plates compared with conventional plates. A systematic review focusing on complications, financial expenses, professional and patient-reported outcome measures

BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery is a well-known surgical procedure for correction of facial deformities. The surgical procedure is performed by the use of conventional plates and by patient-specific osteosynthesis plates (PSOPs). The aim of this study is to investigate any differences in complicati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kesmez, Özlem, Valls-Ontañón, Adaia, Starch-Jensen, Thomas, Haas-Junior, Orion Luiz, Hernández-Alfaro, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9648647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36173724
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25424
_version_ 1784827622525501440
author Kesmez, Özlem
Valls-Ontañón, Adaia
Starch-Jensen, Thomas
Haas-Junior, Orion Luiz
Hernández-Alfaro, Federico
author_facet Kesmez, Özlem
Valls-Ontañón, Adaia
Starch-Jensen, Thomas
Haas-Junior, Orion Luiz
Hernández-Alfaro, Federico
author_sort Kesmez, Özlem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery is a well-known surgical procedure for correction of facial deformities. The surgical procedure is performed by the use of conventional plates and by patient-specific osteosynthesis plates (PSOPs). The aim of this study is to investigate any differences in complications, financial expenses, professional and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in orthognathic surgery performed by conventional plates and by PSOPs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library search was conducted. Human studies published in English through August 27, 2020 were included. Grey literature, unpublished literature as well as other databases like Scopus, Google Scholar, or Research Gate were also included in the search strategy of the present systematic review. Randomized and controlled clinical trials were included. Risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Five studies with unclear risk of bias and moderate quality were included. Meta-analysis was not applicable due to considerable heterogeneity. There was no significant difference in intra- and postoperative complications or professional and PROM with the two treatment modalities, although higher tendencies to reoperations were observed with conventional plates. Financial expenses were significantly higher with PSOP, but treatment planning and intraoperative time were shortened by approximately one third compared with mock surgery and conventional plates. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed in complications, professional and PROM. Higher financial expenses were recorded in orthognathic surgery performed with PSOP. Treatment planning and intraoperative time were shortened with the use of conventional plates. Although further randomized trials are needed before definite conclusions can be provided about beneficial use of PSOPs in orthognathic surgery from a professional and patient perspective. Key words:Orthognathic surgery, systematic review, virtual planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9648647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96486472022-11-14 Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery with the use of patient-specific plates compared with conventional plates. A systematic review focusing on complications, financial expenses, professional and patient-reported outcome measures Kesmez, Özlem Valls-Ontañón, Adaia Starch-Jensen, Thomas Haas-Junior, Orion Luiz Hernández-Alfaro, Federico Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery is a well-known surgical procedure for correction of facial deformities. The surgical procedure is performed by the use of conventional plates and by patient-specific osteosynthesis plates (PSOPs). The aim of this study is to investigate any differences in complications, financial expenses, professional and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in orthognathic surgery performed by conventional plates and by PSOPs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library search was conducted. Human studies published in English through August 27, 2020 were included. Grey literature, unpublished literature as well as other databases like Scopus, Google Scholar, or Research Gate were also included in the search strategy of the present systematic review. Randomized and controlled clinical trials were included. Risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Five studies with unclear risk of bias and moderate quality were included. Meta-analysis was not applicable due to considerable heterogeneity. There was no significant difference in intra- and postoperative complications or professional and PROM with the two treatment modalities, although higher tendencies to reoperations were observed with conventional plates. Financial expenses were significantly higher with PSOP, but treatment planning and intraoperative time were shortened by approximately one third compared with mock surgery and conventional plates. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed in complications, professional and PROM. Higher financial expenses were recorded in orthognathic surgery performed with PSOP. Treatment planning and intraoperative time were shortened with the use of conventional plates. Although further randomized trials are needed before definite conclusions can be provided about beneficial use of PSOPs in orthognathic surgery from a professional and patient perspective. Key words:Orthognathic surgery, systematic review, virtual planning. Medicina Oral S.L. 2022-11 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9648647/ /pubmed/36173724 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25424 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Kesmez, Özlem
Valls-Ontañón, Adaia
Starch-Jensen, Thomas
Haas-Junior, Orion Luiz
Hernández-Alfaro, Federico
Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery with the use of patient-specific plates compared with conventional plates. A systematic review focusing on complications, financial expenses, professional and patient-reported outcome measures
title Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery with the use of patient-specific plates compared with conventional plates. A systematic review focusing on complications, financial expenses, professional and patient-reported outcome measures
title_full Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery with the use of patient-specific plates compared with conventional plates. A systematic review focusing on complications, financial expenses, professional and patient-reported outcome measures
title_fullStr Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery with the use of patient-specific plates compared with conventional plates. A systematic review focusing on complications, financial expenses, professional and patient-reported outcome measures
title_full_unstemmed Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery with the use of patient-specific plates compared with conventional plates. A systematic review focusing on complications, financial expenses, professional and patient-reported outcome measures
title_short Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery with the use of patient-specific plates compared with conventional plates. A systematic review focusing on complications, financial expenses, professional and patient-reported outcome measures
title_sort virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery with the use of patient-specific plates compared with conventional plates. a systematic review focusing on complications, financial expenses, professional and patient-reported outcome measures
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9648647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36173724
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25424
work_keys_str_mv AT kesmezozlem virtualsurgicalplanninginorthognathicsurgerywiththeuseofpatientspecificplatescomparedwithconventionalplatesasystematicreviewfocusingoncomplicationsfinancialexpensesprofessionalandpatientreportedoutcomemeasures
AT vallsontanonadaia virtualsurgicalplanninginorthognathicsurgerywiththeuseofpatientspecificplatescomparedwithconventionalplatesasystematicreviewfocusingoncomplicationsfinancialexpensesprofessionalandpatientreportedoutcomemeasures
AT starchjensenthomas virtualsurgicalplanninginorthognathicsurgerywiththeuseofpatientspecificplatescomparedwithconventionalplatesasystematicreviewfocusingoncomplicationsfinancialexpensesprofessionalandpatientreportedoutcomemeasures
AT haasjuniororionluiz virtualsurgicalplanninginorthognathicsurgerywiththeuseofpatientspecificplatescomparedwithconventionalplatesasystematicreviewfocusingoncomplicationsfinancialexpensesprofessionalandpatientreportedoutcomemeasures
AT hernandezalfarofederico virtualsurgicalplanninginorthognathicsurgerywiththeuseofpatientspecificplatescomparedwithconventionalplatesasystematicreviewfocusingoncomplicationsfinancialexpensesprofessionalandpatientreportedoutcomemeasures