Cargando…

A holistic approach to evaluating Parkinson’s disease, using the Delphi method: a linear evaluation index

BACKGROUND: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic disease that presents a multitude of symptoms, with symptoms of both motor and nonmotor nature. The Delphi method is widely used to create consensuses among experts in a field of knowledge. OBJECTIVE: In order to reach a consensus on the values that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SERRANO-DUEÑAS, Marcos, MASABANDA, Luis, LUQUIN, Maria-Rosario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academia Brasileira de Neurologia -ABNEURO 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9648919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0579
_version_ 1784827684521508864
author SERRANO-DUEÑAS, Marcos
MASABANDA, Luis
LUQUIN, Maria-Rosario
author_facet SERRANO-DUEÑAS, Marcos
MASABANDA, Luis
LUQUIN, Maria-Rosario
author_sort SERRANO-DUEÑAS, Marcos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic disease that presents a multitude of symptoms, with symptoms of both motor and nonmotor nature. The Delphi method is widely used to create consensuses among experts in a field of knowledge. OBJECTIVE: In order to reach a consensus on the values that should be assigned to the different motor and nonmotor manifestations of Parkinson’s disease, a linear evaluation index (LEI) was created. Subsequently, the metric properties of this index were studied. METHODS: 120 consecutive patients with a Parkinson’s diagnosis were chosen in accordance with the UKPDSBB criteria. The Delphi method was used to reach a consensus among experts regarding the values of each of the manifestations included. Subsequently, the following attributes were analyzed: quality and acceptability of the data; reliability, in terms of internal consistency, reliability index, Cronbach’s alpha and standard error of measurement; and validity, in terms of convergent validity and validity for known groups. RESULTS: Twenty-five experts participated. The importance factor did not differ between the first round and the second round (chi-square test). We analyzed the responses that assigned percentage values to the 10 dimensions of the LEI. Both in the first and in the second round, the values of the scattering coefficient Vr were always close to 0. The homogeneity index was 0.36; the corrected-item total correlation values ranged from 0.02 to 0.7; Cronbach’s α was 0.69; and the SEM was 4.23 (55.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The LEI was obtained through rigorous recommended methodology. The results showed adequate metric properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9648919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Academia Brasileira de Neurologia -ABNEURO
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96489192022-12-08 A holistic approach to evaluating Parkinson’s disease, using the Delphi method: a linear evaluation index SERRANO-DUEÑAS, Marcos MASABANDA, Luis LUQUIN, Maria-Rosario Arq Neuropsiquiatr Articles BACKGROUND: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic disease that presents a multitude of symptoms, with symptoms of both motor and nonmotor nature. The Delphi method is widely used to create consensuses among experts in a field of knowledge. OBJECTIVE: In order to reach a consensus on the values that should be assigned to the different motor and nonmotor manifestations of Parkinson’s disease, a linear evaluation index (LEI) was created. Subsequently, the metric properties of this index were studied. METHODS: 120 consecutive patients with a Parkinson’s diagnosis were chosen in accordance with the UKPDSBB criteria. The Delphi method was used to reach a consensus among experts regarding the values of each of the manifestations included. Subsequently, the following attributes were analyzed: quality and acceptability of the data; reliability, in terms of internal consistency, reliability index, Cronbach’s alpha and standard error of measurement; and validity, in terms of convergent validity and validity for known groups. RESULTS: Twenty-five experts participated. The importance factor did not differ between the first round and the second round (chi-square test). We analyzed the responses that assigned percentage values to the 10 dimensions of the LEI. Both in the first and in the second round, the values of the scattering coefficient Vr were always close to 0. The homogeneity index was 0.36; the corrected-item total correlation values ranged from 0.02 to 0.7; Cronbach’s α was 0.69; and the SEM was 4.23 (55.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The LEI was obtained through rigorous recommended methodology. The results showed adequate metric properties. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia -ABNEURO 2021-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9648919/ /pubmed/34932621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0579 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Articles
SERRANO-DUEÑAS, Marcos
MASABANDA, Luis
LUQUIN, Maria-Rosario
A holistic approach to evaluating Parkinson’s disease, using the Delphi method: a linear evaluation index
title A holistic approach to evaluating Parkinson’s disease, using the Delphi method: a linear evaluation index
title_full A holistic approach to evaluating Parkinson’s disease, using the Delphi method: a linear evaluation index
title_fullStr A holistic approach to evaluating Parkinson’s disease, using the Delphi method: a linear evaluation index
title_full_unstemmed A holistic approach to evaluating Parkinson’s disease, using the Delphi method: a linear evaluation index
title_short A holistic approach to evaluating Parkinson’s disease, using the Delphi method: a linear evaluation index
title_sort holistic approach to evaluating parkinson’s disease, using the delphi method: a linear evaluation index
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9648919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0579
work_keys_str_mv AT serranoduenasmarcos aholisticapproachtoevaluatingparkinsonsdiseaseusingthedelphimethodalinearevaluationindex
AT masabandaluis aholisticapproachtoevaluatingparkinsonsdiseaseusingthedelphimethodalinearevaluationindex
AT luquinmariarosario aholisticapproachtoevaluatingparkinsonsdiseaseusingthedelphimethodalinearevaluationindex
AT serranoduenasmarcos holisticapproachtoevaluatingparkinsonsdiseaseusingthedelphimethodalinearevaluationindex
AT masabandaluis holisticapproachtoevaluatingparkinsonsdiseaseusingthedelphimethodalinearevaluationindex
AT luquinmariarosario holisticapproachtoevaluatingparkinsonsdiseaseusingthedelphimethodalinearevaluationindex