Cargando…
Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy
OBJECTIVES: To assess if systematic (SBx) vs. transrectal or transperineal mpMRI-ultrasound targeted combined with systematic (TBx + SBx) biopsy confer different effects on treatment delay to radical prostatectomy measured as Gleason grade group (GGG) upgrade of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36357604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04207-9 |
_version_ | 1784827788356747264 |
---|---|
author | Kachanov, Mykyta Budäus, Lars Witt, Jorn H. Wagner, Christian Zinke, Joerg Fangmeyer, Bernhard Schütte, Andreas Spieker, Tilmann Beyersdorff, Dirk Graefen, Markus Rachubinski, Pawel Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi |
author_facet | Kachanov, Mykyta Budäus, Lars Witt, Jorn H. Wagner, Christian Zinke, Joerg Fangmeyer, Bernhard Schütte, Andreas Spieker, Tilmann Beyersdorff, Dirk Graefen, Markus Rachubinski, Pawel Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi |
author_sort | Kachanov, Mykyta |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess if systematic (SBx) vs. transrectal or transperineal mpMRI-ultrasound targeted combined with systematic (TBx + SBx) biopsy confer different effects on treatment delay to radical prostatectomy measured as Gleason grade group (GGG) upgrade of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We relied on a multi-institutional cohort of localized PCa patients who underwent RP in Martini-Klinik, Hamburg, or Prostate Center Northwest, Gronau, between 2014 and 2022. Analyses were restricted to PCa GGG 1–3 diagnosed at SBx (n = 4475) or TBx + SBx (n = 1282). Multivariable logistic regression modeling (MVA) predicting RP GGG upgrade of ≥ 1 was performed separately for SBx and TBx + SBx. RESULTS: Treatment delay to RP of < 90, 90–180 and 180–365 days was reported in 59%, 35% and 6.2% of SBx and in 60%, 34% and 5.9% of the TBx + SBx patients, respectively. Upgrade to GGG ≥ 4 at RP was detected in 15% of SBx patients and 0.86% of TBx patients. In MVA performed for SBx, treatment delay yielded independent predictor status (OR 1.17 95% CI 1.02–1.39, p = 0.028), whereas for TBx + SBx MVA, statistical significance was not achieved. CONCLUSION: Treatment delay remained independently associated with radical prostatectomy GGG upgrade after adjustment for clinical variables in the patients diagnosed with SBx alone, but not in those who received combined TBx + SBx. These findings can be explained through inherent misclassification rates of SBx, potentially obfuscating historical observations of natural PCa progression and potential dangers of treatment delay. Thus, mpMRI-guided combined TBx + SBx appears mandatory for prospective delay-based examinations of PCa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9649392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96493922022-11-14 Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy Kachanov, Mykyta Budäus, Lars Witt, Jorn H. Wagner, Christian Zinke, Joerg Fangmeyer, Bernhard Schütte, Andreas Spieker, Tilmann Beyersdorff, Dirk Graefen, Markus Rachubinski, Pawel Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi World J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess if systematic (SBx) vs. transrectal or transperineal mpMRI-ultrasound targeted combined with systematic (TBx + SBx) biopsy confer different effects on treatment delay to radical prostatectomy measured as Gleason grade group (GGG) upgrade of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We relied on a multi-institutional cohort of localized PCa patients who underwent RP in Martini-Klinik, Hamburg, or Prostate Center Northwest, Gronau, between 2014 and 2022. Analyses were restricted to PCa GGG 1–3 diagnosed at SBx (n = 4475) or TBx + SBx (n = 1282). Multivariable logistic regression modeling (MVA) predicting RP GGG upgrade of ≥ 1 was performed separately for SBx and TBx + SBx. RESULTS: Treatment delay to RP of < 90, 90–180 and 180–365 days was reported in 59%, 35% and 6.2% of SBx and in 60%, 34% and 5.9% of the TBx + SBx patients, respectively. Upgrade to GGG ≥ 4 at RP was detected in 15% of SBx patients and 0.86% of TBx patients. In MVA performed for SBx, treatment delay yielded independent predictor status (OR 1.17 95% CI 1.02–1.39, p = 0.028), whereas for TBx + SBx MVA, statistical significance was not achieved. CONCLUSION: Treatment delay remained independently associated with radical prostatectomy GGG upgrade after adjustment for clinical variables in the patients diagnosed with SBx alone, but not in those who received combined TBx + SBx. These findings can be explained through inherent misclassification rates of SBx, potentially obfuscating historical observations of natural PCa progression and potential dangers of treatment delay. Thus, mpMRI-guided combined TBx + SBx appears mandatory for prospective delay-based examinations of PCa. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9649392/ /pubmed/36357604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04207-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kachanov, Mykyta Budäus, Lars Witt, Jorn H. Wagner, Christian Zinke, Joerg Fangmeyer, Bernhard Schütte, Andreas Spieker, Tilmann Beyersdorff, Dirk Graefen, Markus Rachubinski, Pawel Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy |
title | Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy |
title_full | Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy |
title_fullStr | Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy |
title_short | Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy |
title_sort | suitability of conventional systematic vs. mri-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36357604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04207-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kachanovmykyta suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy AT budauslars suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy AT wittjornh suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy AT wagnerchristian suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy AT zinkejoerg suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy AT fangmeyerbernhard suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy AT schutteandreas suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy AT spiekertilmann suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy AT beyersdorffdirk suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy AT graefenmarkus suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy AT rachubinskipawel suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy AT leyhbannurahsamiramzi suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy |