Cargando…

Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES: To assess if systematic (SBx) vs. transrectal or transperineal mpMRI-ultrasound targeted combined with systematic (TBx + SBx) biopsy confer different effects on treatment delay to radical prostatectomy measured as Gleason grade group (GGG) upgrade of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kachanov, Mykyta, Budäus, Lars, Witt, Jorn H., Wagner, Christian, Zinke, Joerg, Fangmeyer, Bernhard, Schütte, Andreas, Spieker, Tilmann, Beyersdorff, Dirk, Graefen, Markus, Rachubinski, Pawel, Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36357604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04207-9
_version_ 1784827788356747264
author Kachanov, Mykyta
Budäus, Lars
Witt, Jorn H.
Wagner, Christian
Zinke, Joerg
Fangmeyer, Bernhard
Schütte, Andreas
Spieker, Tilmann
Beyersdorff, Dirk
Graefen, Markus
Rachubinski, Pawel
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
author_facet Kachanov, Mykyta
Budäus, Lars
Witt, Jorn H.
Wagner, Christian
Zinke, Joerg
Fangmeyer, Bernhard
Schütte, Andreas
Spieker, Tilmann
Beyersdorff, Dirk
Graefen, Markus
Rachubinski, Pawel
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
author_sort Kachanov, Mykyta
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess if systematic (SBx) vs. transrectal or transperineal mpMRI-ultrasound targeted combined with systematic (TBx + SBx) biopsy confer different effects on treatment delay to radical prostatectomy measured as Gleason grade group (GGG) upgrade of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We relied on a multi-institutional cohort of localized PCa patients who underwent RP in Martini-Klinik, Hamburg, or Prostate Center Northwest, Gronau, between 2014 and 2022. Analyses were restricted to PCa GGG 1–3 diagnosed at SBx (n = 4475) or TBx + SBx (n = 1282). Multivariable logistic regression modeling (MVA) predicting RP GGG upgrade of ≥ 1 was performed separately for SBx and TBx + SBx. RESULTS: Treatment delay to RP of < 90, 90–180 and 180–365 days was reported in 59%, 35% and 6.2% of SBx and in 60%, 34% and 5.9% of the TBx + SBx patients, respectively. Upgrade to GGG ≥ 4 at RP was detected in 15% of SBx patients and 0.86% of TBx patients. In MVA performed for SBx, treatment delay yielded independent predictor status (OR 1.17 95% CI 1.02–1.39, p = 0.028), whereas for TBx + SBx MVA, statistical significance was not achieved. CONCLUSION: Treatment delay remained independently associated with radical prostatectomy GGG upgrade after adjustment for clinical variables in the patients diagnosed with SBx alone, but not in those who received combined TBx + SBx. These findings can be explained through inherent misclassification rates of SBx, potentially obfuscating historical observations of natural PCa progression and potential dangers of treatment delay. Thus, mpMRI-guided combined TBx + SBx appears mandatory for prospective delay-based examinations of PCa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9649392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96493922022-11-14 Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy Kachanov, Mykyta Budäus, Lars Witt, Jorn H. Wagner, Christian Zinke, Joerg Fangmeyer, Bernhard Schütte, Andreas Spieker, Tilmann Beyersdorff, Dirk Graefen, Markus Rachubinski, Pawel Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi World J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess if systematic (SBx) vs. transrectal or transperineal mpMRI-ultrasound targeted combined with systematic (TBx + SBx) biopsy confer different effects on treatment delay to radical prostatectomy measured as Gleason grade group (GGG) upgrade of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We relied on a multi-institutional cohort of localized PCa patients who underwent RP in Martini-Klinik, Hamburg, or Prostate Center Northwest, Gronau, between 2014 and 2022. Analyses were restricted to PCa GGG 1–3 diagnosed at SBx (n = 4475) or TBx + SBx (n = 1282). Multivariable logistic regression modeling (MVA) predicting RP GGG upgrade of ≥ 1 was performed separately for SBx and TBx + SBx. RESULTS: Treatment delay to RP of < 90, 90–180 and 180–365 days was reported in 59%, 35% and 6.2% of SBx and in 60%, 34% and 5.9% of the TBx + SBx patients, respectively. Upgrade to GGG ≥ 4 at RP was detected in 15% of SBx patients and 0.86% of TBx patients. In MVA performed for SBx, treatment delay yielded independent predictor status (OR 1.17 95% CI 1.02–1.39, p = 0.028), whereas for TBx + SBx MVA, statistical significance was not achieved. CONCLUSION: Treatment delay remained independently associated with radical prostatectomy GGG upgrade after adjustment for clinical variables in the patients diagnosed with SBx alone, but not in those who received combined TBx + SBx. These findings can be explained through inherent misclassification rates of SBx, potentially obfuscating historical observations of natural PCa progression and potential dangers of treatment delay. Thus, mpMRI-guided combined TBx + SBx appears mandatory for prospective delay-based examinations of PCa. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9649392/ /pubmed/36357604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04207-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kachanov, Mykyta
Budäus, Lars
Witt, Jorn H.
Wagner, Christian
Zinke, Joerg
Fangmeyer, Bernhard
Schütte, Andreas
Spieker, Tilmann
Beyersdorff, Dirk
Graefen, Markus
Rachubinski, Pawel
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy
title Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy
title_full Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy
title_short Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy
title_sort suitability of conventional systematic vs. mri-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36357604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04207-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kachanovmykyta suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy
AT budauslars suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy
AT wittjornh suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy
AT wagnerchristian suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy
AT zinkejoerg suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy
AT fangmeyerbernhard suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy
AT schutteandreas suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy
AT spiekertilmann suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy
AT beyersdorffdirk suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy
AT graefenmarkus suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy
AT rachubinskipawel suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy
AT leyhbannurahsamiramzi suitabilityofconventionalsystematicvsmriguidedtargetedbiopsyapproachestoassesssurgicaltreatmentdelayforradicalprostatectomy