Cargando…
Osteoporosis treatment in Austria—assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk
SUMMARY: The adoption of the management pathway proposed by the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG), UK applied using the Austrian FRAX® tool in a referral population of Austrian women categorises 22–29% of women age 40 years or more eligible for treatment of whom 28–34% are classified at v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36357621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01175-w |
_version_ | 1784827800309465088 |
---|---|
author | Dimai, Hans P. Johansson, Helena Harvey, Nicholas C. Lorentzon, Mattias Liu, Enwu Vandenput, Liesbeth Fahrleitner-Pammer, Astrid Pietschmann, Peter Muschitz, Christian McCloskey, Eugene V. Kanis, John A. |
author_facet | Dimai, Hans P. Johansson, Helena Harvey, Nicholas C. Lorentzon, Mattias Liu, Enwu Vandenput, Liesbeth Fahrleitner-Pammer, Astrid Pietschmann, Peter Muschitz, Christian McCloskey, Eugene V. Kanis, John A. |
author_sort | Dimai, Hans P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SUMMARY: The adoption of the management pathway proposed by the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG), UK applied using the Austrian FRAX® tool in a referral population of Austrian women categorises 22–29% of women age 40 years or more eligible for treatment of whom 28–34% are classified at very high risk. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide a reference document for the further development of existing guidelines for the management of osteoporosis in Austria, considering FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk. METHODS: The model development was based on two Austrian hospital referral cohorts. Baseline information was collected to compute the 10-year probability (using the Austrian FRAX model) of a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture both with and without the inclusion of femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). Assessment thresholds for BMD testing were defined, as well as intervention thresholds. In addition, thresholds that characterise men and women at high and very high fracture risk were established. The management pathway followed that currently recommended by the UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). RESULTS: The two cohorts comprised a total of 1306 women and men with a mean age of 66.7 years. Slightly more than 50% were eligible for treatment by virtue of a prior fragility fracture. In those women without a prior fracture, 22% (n = 120) were eligible for treatment based on MOF probabilities. Of these, 28% (n = 33) were found to be at very high risk. When both MOF and hip fracture probabilities were used to characterise risk, 164 women without a prior fracture were eligible for treatment (29%). Of these, 34% (n = 56) were found to be at very high risk. Fewer men without prior fracture were eligible for treatment compared with women. CONCLUSION: The management pathway as currently outlined is expected to reduce inequalities in patient management. The characterisation of very high risk may aid in the identification of patients suitable for treatment with osteoanabolic agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9649455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96494552022-11-15 Osteoporosis treatment in Austria—assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk Dimai, Hans P. Johansson, Helena Harvey, Nicholas C. Lorentzon, Mattias Liu, Enwu Vandenput, Liesbeth Fahrleitner-Pammer, Astrid Pietschmann, Peter Muschitz, Christian McCloskey, Eugene V. Kanis, John A. Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: The adoption of the management pathway proposed by the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG), UK applied using the Austrian FRAX® tool in a referral population of Austrian women categorises 22–29% of women age 40 years or more eligible for treatment of whom 28–34% are classified at very high risk. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide a reference document for the further development of existing guidelines for the management of osteoporosis in Austria, considering FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk. METHODS: The model development was based on two Austrian hospital referral cohorts. Baseline information was collected to compute the 10-year probability (using the Austrian FRAX model) of a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture both with and without the inclusion of femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). Assessment thresholds for BMD testing were defined, as well as intervention thresholds. In addition, thresholds that characterise men and women at high and very high fracture risk were established. The management pathway followed that currently recommended by the UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). RESULTS: The two cohorts comprised a total of 1306 women and men with a mean age of 66.7 years. Slightly more than 50% were eligible for treatment by virtue of a prior fragility fracture. In those women without a prior fracture, 22% (n = 120) were eligible for treatment based on MOF probabilities. Of these, 28% (n = 33) were found to be at very high risk. When both MOF and hip fracture probabilities were used to characterise risk, 164 women without a prior fracture were eligible for treatment (29%). Of these, 34% (n = 56) were found to be at very high risk. Fewer men without prior fracture were eligible for treatment compared with women. CONCLUSION: The management pathway as currently outlined is expected to reduce inequalities in patient management. The characterisation of very high risk may aid in the identification of patients suitable for treatment with osteoanabolic agents. Springer London 2022-11-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9649455/ /pubmed/36357621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01175-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dimai, Hans P. Johansson, Helena Harvey, Nicholas C. Lorentzon, Mattias Liu, Enwu Vandenput, Liesbeth Fahrleitner-Pammer, Astrid Pietschmann, Peter Muschitz, Christian McCloskey, Eugene V. Kanis, John A. Osteoporosis treatment in Austria—assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk |
title | Osteoporosis treatment in Austria—assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk |
title_full | Osteoporosis treatment in Austria—assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk |
title_fullStr | Osteoporosis treatment in Austria—assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Osteoporosis treatment in Austria—assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk |
title_short | Osteoporosis treatment in Austria—assessment of FRAX-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk |
title_sort | osteoporosis treatment in austria—assessment of frax-based intervention thresholds for high and very high fracture risk |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36357621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01175-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dimaihansp osteoporosistreatmentinaustriaassessmentoffraxbasedinterventionthresholdsforhighandveryhighfracturerisk AT johanssonhelena osteoporosistreatmentinaustriaassessmentoffraxbasedinterventionthresholdsforhighandveryhighfracturerisk AT harveynicholasc osteoporosistreatmentinaustriaassessmentoffraxbasedinterventionthresholdsforhighandveryhighfracturerisk AT lorentzonmattias osteoporosistreatmentinaustriaassessmentoffraxbasedinterventionthresholdsforhighandveryhighfracturerisk AT liuenwu osteoporosistreatmentinaustriaassessmentoffraxbasedinterventionthresholdsforhighandveryhighfracturerisk AT vandenputliesbeth osteoporosistreatmentinaustriaassessmentoffraxbasedinterventionthresholdsforhighandveryhighfracturerisk AT fahrleitnerpammerastrid osteoporosistreatmentinaustriaassessmentoffraxbasedinterventionthresholdsforhighandveryhighfracturerisk AT pietschmannpeter osteoporosistreatmentinaustriaassessmentoffraxbasedinterventionthresholdsforhighandveryhighfracturerisk AT muschitzchristian osteoporosistreatmentinaustriaassessmentoffraxbasedinterventionthresholdsforhighandveryhighfracturerisk AT mccloskeyeugenev osteoporosistreatmentinaustriaassessmentoffraxbasedinterventionthresholdsforhighandveryhighfracturerisk AT kanisjohna osteoporosistreatmentinaustriaassessmentoffraxbasedinterventionthresholdsforhighandveryhighfracturerisk |