Cargando…

Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study

BACKGROUND: Successful bowel preparation (BP) for colonoscopy depends on the instructions, diet, the laxative product, and patient adherence, which all affect colonoscopy quality. Nevertheless, there are no laxatives which combine effectiveness, safety, easy self-administration, good patient accepta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spada, Cristiano, Fiori, Giancarla, Uebel, Peter, Tontini, Gian Eugenio, Cesaro, Paola, Grazioli, Leonardo Minelli, Soru, Pietro, Bravi, Ivana, Hinkel, Carsten, Prada, Alberto, Di Paolo, Dhanai, Zimmermann, Tim, Manes, Gianpiero, Valats, Jean Christophe, Jakobs, Ralf, Elli, Luca, Carnovali, Marino, Ciprandi, Giorgio, Radaelli, Franco, Vecchi, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03405-z
_version_ 1784827812611358720
author Spada, Cristiano
Fiori, Giancarla
Uebel, Peter
Tontini, Gian Eugenio
Cesaro, Paola
Grazioli, Leonardo Minelli
Soru, Pietro
Bravi, Ivana
Hinkel, Carsten
Prada, Alberto
Di Paolo, Dhanai
Zimmermann, Tim
Manes, Gianpiero
Valats, Jean Christophe
Jakobs, Ralf
Elli, Luca
Carnovali, Marino
Ciprandi, Giorgio
Radaelli, Franco
Vecchi, Maurizio
author_facet Spada, Cristiano
Fiori, Giancarla
Uebel, Peter
Tontini, Gian Eugenio
Cesaro, Paola
Grazioli, Leonardo Minelli
Soru, Pietro
Bravi, Ivana
Hinkel, Carsten
Prada, Alberto
Di Paolo, Dhanai
Zimmermann, Tim
Manes, Gianpiero
Valats, Jean Christophe
Jakobs, Ralf
Elli, Luca
Carnovali, Marino
Ciprandi, Giorgio
Radaelli, Franco
Vecchi, Maurizio
author_sort Spada, Cristiano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Successful bowel preparation (BP) for colonoscopy depends on the instructions, diet, the laxative product, and patient adherence, which all affect colonoscopy quality. Nevertheless, there are no laxatives which combine effectiveness, safety, easy self-administration, good patient acceptance, and low cost. However, mannitol, a sugar alcohol, could be an attractive candidate for use in clinical practice if it is shown to demonstrate adequate efficacy and safety. AIMS: The present phase II dose-finding study compared three doses of mannitol (50, 100, and 150 g) to identify the best dose to be used in a subsequent phase III study. METHODS: The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, caecal intubation rate, adherence, acceptability, and safety profile, including measurement of potentially dangerous colonic gas concentrations (CH(4), H(2), O(2)), were considered in all patients. A weighted algorithm was used to identify the best mannitol dose for use in the subsequent study. RESULTS: The per-protocol population included 60 patients in the 50 g group, 54 in the 100 g group, and 49 in the 150 g group. The 100 g dose was the best as it afforded optimal colon cleansing efficacy (94.4% of patients had adequate BP), adherence, acceptability, and safety, including negligible gas concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that the colon cleansing efficacy and safety of mannitol were dose dependent. Conversely, gas concentrations were not dose dependent and negligible in all patients. Combined evaluation of efficacy, tolerability, and safety, using a weighted algorithm, determined that mannitol 100 g was the best dose for the phase III study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9649514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96495142022-11-15 Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study Spada, Cristiano Fiori, Giancarla Uebel, Peter Tontini, Gian Eugenio Cesaro, Paola Grazioli, Leonardo Minelli Soru, Pietro Bravi, Ivana Hinkel, Carsten Prada, Alberto Di Paolo, Dhanai Zimmermann, Tim Manes, Gianpiero Valats, Jean Christophe Jakobs, Ralf Elli, Luca Carnovali, Marino Ciprandi, Giorgio Radaelli, Franco Vecchi, Maurizio Eur J Clin Pharmacol Research BACKGROUND: Successful bowel preparation (BP) for colonoscopy depends on the instructions, diet, the laxative product, and patient adherence, which all affect colonoscopy quality. Nevertheless, there are no laxatives which combine effectiveness, safety, easy self-administration, good patient acceptance, and low cost. However, mannitol, a sugar alcohol, could be an attractive candidate for use in clinical practice if it is shown to demonstrate adequate efficacy and safety. AIMS: The present phase II dose-finding study compared three doses of mannitol (50, 100, and 150 g) to identify the best dose to be used in a subsequent phase III study. METHODS: The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, caecal intubation rate, adherence, acceptability, and safety profile, including measurement of potentially dangerous colonic gas concentrations (CH(4), H(2), O(2)), were considered in all patients. A weighted algorithm was used to identify the best mannitol dose for use in the subsequent study. RESULTS: The per-protocol population included 60 patients in the 50 g group, 54 in the 100 g group, and 49 in the 150 g group. The 100 g dose was the best as it afforded optimal colon cleansing efficacy (94.4% of patients had adequate BP), adherence, acceptability, and safety, including negligible gas concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that the colon cleansing efficacy and safety of mannitol were dose dependent. Conversely, gas concentrations were not dose dependent and negligible in all patients. Combined evaluation of efficacy, tolerability, and safety, using a weighted algorithm, determined that mannitol 100 g was the best dose for the phase III study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9649514/ /pubmed/36287232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03405-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Spada, Cristiano
Fiori, Giancarla
Uebel, Peter
Tontini, Gian Eugenio
Cesaro, Paola
Grazioli, Leonardo Minelli
Soru, Pietro
Bravi, Ivana
Hinkel, Carsten
Prada, Alberto
Di Paolo, Dhanai
Zimmermann, Tim
Manes, Gianpiero
Valats, Jean Christophe
Jakobs, Ralf
Elli, Luca
Carnovali, Marino
Ciprandi, Giorgio
Radaelli, Franco
Vecchi, Maurizio
Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study
title Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study
title_full Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study
title_fullStr Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study
title_full_unstemmed Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study
title_short Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study
title_sort oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase ii study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03405-z
work_keys_str_mv AT spadacristiano oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT fiorigiancarla oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT uebelpeter oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT tontinigianeugenio oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT cesaropaola oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT graziolileonardominelli oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT sorupietro oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT braviivana oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT hinkelcarsten oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT pradaalberto oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT dipaolodhanai oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT zimmermanntim oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT manesgianpiero oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT valatsjeanchristophe oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT jakobsralf oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT elliluca oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT carnovalimarino oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT ciprandigiorgio oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT radaellifranco oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy
AT vecchimaurizio oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy