Cargando…
Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study
BACKGROUND: Successful bowel preparation (BP) for colonoscopy depends on the instructions, diet, the laxative product, and patient adherence, which all affect colonoscopy quality. Nevertheless, there are no laxatives which combine effectiveness, safety, easy self-administration, good patient accepta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03405-z |
_version_ | 1784827812611358720 |
---|---|
author | Spada, Cristiano Fiori, Giancarla Uebel, Peter Tontini, Gian Eugenio Cesaro, Paola Grazioli, Leonardo Minelli Soru, Pietro Bravi, Ivana Hinkel, Carsten Prada, Alberto Di Paolo, Dhanai Zimmermann, Tim Manes, Gianpiero Valats, Jean Christophe Jakobs, Ralf Elli, Luca Carnovali, Marino Ciprandi, Giorgio Radaelli, Franco Vecchi, Maurizio |
author_facet | Spada, Cristiano Fiori, Giancarla Uebel, Peter Tontini, Gian Eugenio Cesaro, Paola Grazioli, Leonardo Minelli Soru, Pietro Bravi, Ivana Hinkel, Carsten Prada, Alberto Di Paolo, Dhanai Zimmermann, Tim Manes, Gianpiero Valats, Jean Christophe Jakobs, Ralf Elli, Luca Carnovali, Marino Ciprandi, Giorgio Radaelli, Franco Vecchi, Maurizio |
author_sort | Spada, Cristiano |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Successful bowel preparation (BP) for colonoscopy depends on the instructions, diet, the laxative product, and patient adherence, which all affect colonoscopy quality. Nevertheless, there are no laxatives which combine effectiveness, safety, easy self-administration, good patient acceptance, and low cost. However, mannitol, a sugar alcohol, could be an attractive candidate for use in clinical practice if it is shown to demonstrate adequate efficacy and safety. AIMS: The present phase II dose-finding study compared three doses of mannitol (50, 100, and 150 g) to identify the best dose to be used in a subsequent phase III study. METHODS: The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, caecal intubation rate, adherence, acceptability, and safety profile, including measurement of potentially dangerous colonic gas concentrations (CH(4), H(2), O(2)), were considered in all patients. A weighted algorithm was used to identify the best mannitol dose for use in the subsequent study. RESULTS: The per-protocol population included 60 patients in the 50 g group, 54 in the 100 g group, and 49 in the 150 g group. The 100 g dose was the best as it afforded optimal colon cleansing efficacy (94.4% of patients had adequate BP), adherence, acceptability, and safety, including negligible gas concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that the colon cleansing efficacy and safety of mannitol were dose dependent. Conversely, gas concentrations were not dose dependent and negligible in all patients. Combined evaluation of efficacy, tolerability, and safety, using a weighted algorithm, determined that mannitol 100 g was the best dose for the phase III study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9649514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96495142022-11-15 Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study Spada, Cristiano Fiori, Giancarla Uebel, Peter Tontini, Gian Eugenio Cesaro, Paola Grazioli, Leonardo Minelli Soru, Pietro Bravi, Ivana Hinkel, Carsten Prada, Alberto Di Paolo, Dhanai Zimmermann, Tim Manes, Gianpiero Valats, Jean Christophe Jakobs, Ralf Elli, Luca Carnovali, Marino Ciprandi, Giorgio Radaelli, Franco Vecchi, Maurizio Eur J Clin Pharmacol Research BACKGROUND: Successful bowel preparation (BP) for colonoscopy depends on the instructions, diet, the laxative product, and patient adherence, which all affect colonoscopy quality. Nevertheless, there are no laxatives which combine effectiveness, safety, easy self-administration, good patient acceptance, and low cost. However, mannitol, a sugar alcohol, could be an attractive candidate for use in clinical practice if it is shown to demonstrate adequate efficacy and safety. AIMS: The present phase II dose-finding study compared three doses of mannitol (50, 100, and 150 g) to identify the best dose to be used in a subsequent phase III study. METHODS: The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, caecal intubation rate, adherence, acceptability, and safety profile, including measurement of potentially dangerous colonic gas concentrations (CH(4), H(2), O(2)), were considered in all patients. A weighted algorithm was used to identify the best mannitol dose for use in the subsequent study. RESULTS: The per-protocol population included 60 patients in the 50 g group, 54 in the 100 g group, and 49 in the 150 g group. The 100 g dose was the best as it afforded optimal colon cleansing efficacy (94.4% of patients had adequate BP), adherence, acceptability, and safety, including negligible gas concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that the colon cleansing efficacy and safety of mannitol were dose dependent. Conversely, gas concentrations were not dose dependent and negligible in all patients. Combined evaluation of efficacy, tolerability, and safety, using a weighted algorithm, determined that mannitol 100 g was the best dose for the phase III study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9649514/ /pubmed/36287232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03405-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Spada, Cristiano Fiori, Giancarla Uebel, Peter Tontini, Gian Eugenio Cesaro, Paola Grazioli, Leonardo Minelli Soru, Pietro Bravi, Ivana Hinkel, Carsten Prada, Alberto Di Paolo, Dhanai Zimmermann, Tim Manes, Gianpiero Valats, Jean Christophe Jakobs, Ralf Elli, Luca Carnovali, Marino Ciprandi, Giorgio Radaelli, Franco Vecchi, Maurizio Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study |
title | Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study |
title_full | Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study |
title_fullStr | Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study |
title_short | Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study |
title_sort | oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase ii study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03405-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spadacristiano oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT fiorigiancarla oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT uebelpeter oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT tontinigianeugenio oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT cesaropaola oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT graziolileonardominelli oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT sorupietro oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT braviivana oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT hinkelcarsten oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT pradaalberto oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT dipaolodhanai oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT zimmermanntim oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT manesgianpiero oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT valatsjeanchristophe oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT jakobsralf oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT elliluca oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT carnovalimarino oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT ciprandigiorgio oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT radaellifranco oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy AT vecchimaurizio oralmannitolforbowelpreparationadosefindingphaseiistudy |