Cargando…

Rethinking clinical study data: why we should respect analysis results as data

The development and approval of new treatments generates large volumes of results, such as summaries of efficacy and safety. However, it is commonly overlooked that analyzing clinical study data also produces data in the form of results. For example, descriptive statistics and model predictions are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barros, Joana M., Widmer, Lukas A., Baillie, Mark, Wandel, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36357430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01789-2
_version_ 1784827842779938816
author Barros, Joana M.
Widmer, Lukas A.
Baillie, Mark
Wandel, Simon
author_facet Barros, Joana M.
Widmer, Lukas A.
Baillie, Mark
Wandel, Simon
author_sort Barros, Joana M.
collection PubMed
description The development and approval of new treatments generates large volumes of results, such as summaries of efficacy and safety. However, it is commonly overlooked that analyzing clinical study data also produces data in the form of results. For example, descriptive statistics and model predictions are data. Although integrating and putting findings into context is a cornerstone of scientific work, analysis results are often neglected as a data source. Results end up stored as “data products” such as PDF documents that are not machine readable or amenable to future analyses. We propose a solution to “calculate once, use many times” by combining analysis results standards with a common data model. This analysis results data model re-frames the target of analyses from static representations of the results (e.g., tables and figures) to a data model with applications in various contexts, including knowledge discovery. Further, we provide a working proof of concept detailing how to approach standardization and construct a schema to store and query analysis results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9649650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96496502022-11-15 Rethinking clinical study data: why we should respect analysis results as data Barros, Joana M. Widmer, Lukas A. Baillie, Mark Wandel, Simon Sci Data Article The development and approval of new treatments generates large volumes of results, such as summaries of efficacy and safety. However, it is commonly overlooked that analyzing clinical study data also produces data in the form of results. For example, descriptive statistics and model predictions are data. Although integrating and putting findings into context is a cornerstone of scientific work, analysis results are often neglected as a data source. Results end up stored as “data products” such as PDF documents that are not machine readable or amenable to future analyses. We propose a solution to “calculate once, use many times” by combining analysis results standards with a common data model. This analysis results data model re-frames the target of analyses from static representations of the results (e.g., tables and figures) to a data model with applications in various contexts, including knowledge discovery. Further, we provide a working proof of concept detailing how to approach standardization and construct a schema to store and query analysis results. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9649650/ /pubmed/36357430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01789-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Barros, Joana M.
Widmer, Lukas A.
Baillie, Mark
Wandel, Simon
Rethinking clinical study data: why we should respect analysis results as data
title Rethinking clinical study data: why we should respect analysis results as data
title_full Rethinking clinical study data: why we should respect analysis results as data
title_fullStr Rethinking clinical study data: why we should respect analysis results as data
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking clinical study data: why we should respect analysis results as data
title_short Rethinking clinical study data: why we should respect analysis results as data
title_sort rethinking clinical study data: why we should respect analysis results as data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36357430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01789-2
work_keys_str_mv AT barrosjoanam rethinkingclinicalstudydatawhyweshouldrespectanalysisresultsasdata
AT widmerlukasa rethinkingclinicalstudydatawhyweshouldrespectanalysisresultsasdata
AT bailliemark rethinkingclinicalstudydatawhyweshouldrespectanalysisresultsasdata
AT wandelsimon rethinkingclinicalstudydatawhyweshouldrespectanalysisresultsasdata