Cargando…
Do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party?
In the cocktail party situation, people with normal hearing usually follow a single speaker among multiple concurrent ones. However, there is no agreement in the literature as to whether the background is segregated into multiple streams/speakers. The current study varied the number of concurrent sp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36393982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.952557 |
_version_ | 1784827872482951168 |
---|---|
author | Szalárdy, Orsolya Tóth, Brigitta Farkas, Dávid Orosz, Gábor Winkler, István |
author_facet | Szalárdy, Orsolya Tóth, Brigitta Farkas, Dávid Orosz, Gábor Winkler, István |
author_sort | Szalárdy, Orsolya |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the cocktail party situation, people with normal hearing usually follow a single speaker among multiple concurrent ones. However, there is no agreement in the literature as to whether the background is segregated into multiple streams/speakers. The current study varied the number of concurrent speech streams and investigated target detection and memory for the contents of a target stream as well as the processing of distractors. A male-voiced target stream was either presented alone (single-speech), together with one male-voiced distractor (one-distractor), or a male- and a female-voiced distractor (two-distractor). Behavioral measures of target detection and content tracking performance as well as target- and distractor detection related event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were assessed. We found that the N2 amplitude decreased whereas the P3 amplitude increased from the single-speech to the concurrent speech streams conditions. Importantly, the behavioral effect of distractors differed between the conditions with one vs. two distractor speech streams and the non-zero voltages in the N2 time window for distractor numerals and in the P3 time window for syntactic violations appearing in the non-target speech stream significantly differed between the one- and two-distractor conditions for the same (male) speaker. These results support the notion that the two background speech streams are segregated, as they show that distractors and syntactic violations appearing in the non-target streams are processed even when two speech non-target speech streams are delivered together with the target stream. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9649784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96497842022-11-15 Do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party? Szalárdy, Orsolya Tóth, Brigitta Farkas, Dávid Orosz, Gábor Winkler, István Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience In the cocktail party situation, people with normal hearing usually follow a single speaker among multiple concurrent ones. However, there is no agreement in the literature as to whether the background is segregated into multiple streams/speakers. The current study varied the number of concurrent speech streams and investigated target detection and memory for the contents of a target stream as well as the processing of distractors. A male-voiced target stream was either presented alone (single-speech), together with one male-voiced distractor (one-distractor), or a male- and a female-voiced distractor (two-distractor). Behavioral measures of target detection and content tracking performance as well as target- and distractor detection related event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were assessed. We found that the N2 amplitude decreased whereas the P3 amplitude increased from the single-speech to the concurrent speech streams conditions. Importantly, the behavioral effect of distractors differed between the conditions with one vs. two distractor speech streams and the non-zero voltages in the N2 time window for distractor numerals and in the P3 time window for syntactic violations appearing in the non-target speech stream significantly differed between the one- and two-distractor conditions for the same (male) speaker. These results support the notion that the two background speech streams are segregated, as they show that distractors and syntactic violations appearing in the non-target streams are processed even when two speech non-target speech streams are delivered together with the target stream. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9649784/ /pubmed/36393982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.952557 Text en Copyright © 2022 Szalárdy, Tóth, Farkas, Orosz and Winkler. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Szalárdy, Orsolya Tóth, Brigitta Farkas, Dávid Orosz, Gábor Winkler, István Do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party? |
title | Do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party? |
title_full | Do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party? |
title_fullStr | Do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party? |
title_short | Do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party? |
title_sort | do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party? |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9649784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36393982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.952557 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szalardyorsolya doweparsethebackgroundintoseparatestreamsinthecocktailparty AT tothbrigitta doweparsethebackgroundintoseparatestreamsinthecocktailparty AT farkasdavid doweparsethebackgroundintoseparatestreamsinthecocktailparty AT oroszgabor doweparsethebackgroundintoseparatestreamsinthecocktailparty AT winkleristvan doweparsethebackgroundintoseparatestreamsinthecocktailparty |