Cargando…

Methylene blue dosing strategies in critically ill adults with shock—A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Shock increases mortality in the critically ill and the mainstay of therapy is the administration of vasopressor agents to achieve hemodynamic targets. In the past, studies have found that the NO-pathway antagonist methylene blue improves hemodynamics. However, the optimal dosing strateg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sari-Yavuz, Sibel, Heck-Swain, Ka-Lin, Keller, Marius, Magunia, Harry, Feng, You-Shan, Haeberle, Helene A., Wied, Petra, Schlensak, Christian, Rosenberger, Peter, Koeppen, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9650001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1014276
_version_ 1784827910900678656
author Sari-Yavuz, Sibel
Heck-Swain, Ka-Lin
Keller, Marius
Magunia, Harry
Feng, You-Shan
Haeberle, Helene A.
Wied, Petra
Schlensak, Christian
Rosenberger, Peter
Koeppen, Michael
author_facet Sari-Yavuz, Sibel
Heck-Swain, Ka-Lin
Keller, Marius
Magunia, Harry
Feng, You-Shan
Haeberle, Helene A.
Wied, Petra
Schlensak, Christian
Rosenberger, Peter
Koeppen, Michael
author_sort Sari-Yavuz, Sibel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shock increases mortality in the critically ill and the mainstay of therapy is the administration of vasopressor agents to achieve hemodynamic targets. In the past, studies have found that the NO-pathway antagonist methylene blue improves hemodynamics. However, the optimal dosing strategy remains elusive. Therefore, we investigated the hemodynamic and ICU outcome parameters of three different dosing strategies for methylene blue. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients in shock treated with methylene blue. Shock was defined as norepinephrine dose >0.1 μg/kg/min and serum lactate level >2 mmol/l at the start of methylene blue administration. Different demographic variables, ICU treatment, and outcome parameters were evaluated. To compare the differences in the administration of vasopressors or inotropes, the vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) was calculated at different time points after starting the administration of methylene blue. Response to methylene blue or mortality at 28 days were assessed. RESULTS: 262 patients from July 2014 to October 2019 received methylene blue. 209 patients met the inclusion criteria. Three different dosing strategies were identified: bolus injection followed by continuous infusion (n = 111), bolus injection only (no continuous infusion; n = 59) or continuous infusion only (no bolus prior; n = 39). The groups did not differ in demographics, ICU scoring system, or comorbidities. In all groups, VIS decreased over time, indicating improved hemodynamics. Cardiogenic shock and higher doses of norepinephrine increased the chance of responding to methylene blue, while bolus only decreased the chance of responding to methylene blue treatment. 28-day mortality increased with higher SAPSII scores and higher serum lactate levels, while bolus injection followed by continuous infusion decreased 28-day mortality. No severe side effects were noted. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, methylene blue as a bolus injection followed by continuous infusion was associated with a reduced 28-day mortality in patients with shock. Prospective studies are needed to systematically evaluate the role of methylene blue in the treatment of shock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9650001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96500012022-11-15 Methylene blue dosing strategies in critically ill adults with shock—A retrospective cohort study Sari-Yavuz, Sibel Heck-Swain, Ka-Lin Keller, Marius Magunia, Harry Feng, You-Shan Haeberle, Helene A. Wied, Petra Schlensak, Christian Rosenberger, Peter Koeppen, Michael Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Shock increases mortality in the critically ill and the mainstay of therapy is the administration of vasopressor agents to achieve hemodynamic targets. In the past, studies have found that the NO-pathway antagonist methylene blue improves hemodynamics. However, the optimal dosing strategy remains elusive. Therefore, we investigated the hemodynamic and ICU outcome parameters of three different dosing strategies for methylene blue. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients in shock treated with methylene blue. Shock was defined as norepinephrine dose >0.1 μg/kg/min and serum lactate level >2 mmol/l at the start of methylene blue administration. Different demographic variables, ICU treatment, and outcome parameters were evaluated. To compare the differences in the administration of vasopressors or inotropes, the vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) was calculated at different time points after starting the administration of methylene blue. Response to methylene blue or mortality at 28 days were assessed. RESULTS: 262 patients from July 2014 to October 2019 received methylene blue. 209 patients met the inclusion criteria. Three different dosing strategies were identified: bolus injection followed by continuous infusion (n = 111), bolus injection only (no continuous infusion; n = 59) or continuous infusion only (no bolus prior; n = 39). The groups did not differ in demographics, ICU scoring system, or comorbidities. In all groups, VIS decreased over time, indicating improved hemodynamics. Cardiogenic shock and higher doses of norepinephrine increased the chance of responding to methylene blue, while bolus only decreased the chance of responding to methylene blue treatment. 28-day mortality increased with higher SAPSII scores and higher serum lactate levels, while bolus injection followed by continuous infusion decreased 28-day mortality. No severe side effects were noted. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, methylene blue as a bolus injection followed by continuous infusion was associated with a reduced 28-day mortality in patients with shock. Prospective studies are needed to systematically evaluate the role of methylene blue in the treatment of shock. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9650001/ /pubmed/36388905 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1014276 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sari-Yavuz, Heck-Swain, Keller, Magunia, Feng, Haeberle, Wied, Schlensak, Rosenberger and Koeppen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Sari-Yavuz, Sibel
Heck-Swain, Ka-Lin
Keller, Marius
Magunia, Harry
Feng, You-Shan
Haeberle, Helene A.
Wied, Petra
Schlensak, Christian
Rosenberger, Peter
Koeppen, Michael
Methylene blue dosing strategies in critically ill adults with shock—A retrospective cohort study
title Methylene blue dosing strategies in critically ill adults with shock—A retrospective cohort study
title_full Methylene blue dosing strategies in critically ill adults with shock—A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Methylene blue dosing strategies in critically ill adults with shock—A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Methylene blue dosing strategies in critically ill adults with shock—A retrospective cohort study
title_short Methylene blue dosing strategies in critically ill adults with shock—A retrospective cohort study
title_sort methylene blue dosing strategies in critically ill adults with shock—a retrospective cohort study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9650001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1014276
work_keys_str_mv AT sariyavuzsibel methylenebluedosingstrategiesincriticallyilladultswithshockaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT heckswainkalin methylenebluedosingstrategiesincriticallyilladultswithshockaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kellermarius methylenebluedosingstrategiesincriticallyilladultswithshockaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT maguniaharry methylenebluedosingstrategiesincriticallyilladultswithshockaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT fengyoushan methylenebluedosingstrategiesincriticallyilladultswithshockaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT haeberlehelenea methylenebluedosingstrategiesincriticallyilladultswithshockaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wiedpetra methylenebluedosingstrategiesincriticallyilladultswithshockaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT schlensakchristian methylenebluedosingstrategiesincriticallyilladultswithshockaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT rosenbergerpeter methylenebluedosingstrategiesincriticallyilladultswithshockaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT koeppenmichael methylenebluedosingstrategiesincriticallyilladultswithshockaretrospectivecohortstudy