Cargando…

Association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the association of cervical disorders on obstetric outcomes of singleton pregnancies in China. METHODS: This hospital-based retrospective cohort study of women with live singleton births included 71,097 Chinese women. We compared the risk of advers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Hanxiang, Su, Xiujuan, Liu, Yang, Huang, Shijia, Liu, Xiaosong, Li, Guohua, Du, Qiaoling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9650240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.981405
_version_ 1784827968600670208
author Sun, Hanxiang
Su, Xiujuan
Liu, Yang
Huang, Shijia
Liu, Xiaosong
Li, Guohua
Du, Qiaoling
author_facet Sun, Hanxiang
Su, Xiujuan
Liu, Yang
Huang, Shijia
Liu, Xiaosong
Li, Guohua
Du, Qiaoling
author_sort Sun, Hanxiang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the association of cervical disorders on obstetric outcomes of singleton pregnancies in China. METHODS: This hospital-based retrospective cohort study of women with live singleton births included 71,097 Chinese women. We compared the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in different types of pregnancies with cervical disorders with those with normal cervix. Logistic regression model was used to estimate the association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes. RESULTS: Women with cervical disorders had a higher risk of premature delivery (10.98 vs. 4.41%), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (3.48 vs. 1.62%), low birth weight (LBW) (7.62 vs. 2.92%) and very low birth weight (VLBW) (2.01 vs. 0.28%) than women with normal cervix. After adjusting for confounding factors, compared with women with normal cervix, women with high-grade abnormal cervical cytology are at greater risk of premature birth (adjusted OR 1.971, 95% CI: 1.302–2.983), premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (adjusted OR 1.379, 95% CI: 1.047–1.815), LBW (adjusted OR 1.790, 95% CI: 1.059–3.025), and VLBW (adjusted OR 4.519, 95% CI: 1.662–12.292) than women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology, and women with abnormal cervical cytology after treatment had a higher risk of premature birth (adjusted OR 2.060, 95% CI: 1.348–3.147), PROM (adjusted OR 1.381, 95% CI: 1.038–1.839), PPROM (adjusted OR 1.995, 95% CI: 1.022–3.892), LBW (adjusted OR 1.801, 95% CI: 1.046–3.102), and VLBW (adjusted OR 4.868, 95% CI: 1.788–13.255) than untreated women. CONCLUSIONS: Our research showed that pregnant women with cervical disorders were more likely to have premature delivery, PPROM, LBW, and VLBW. Moreover, pregnant women with high-grade abnormal cervical cytology and abnormal cervical cytology after treatment had a higher risk of premature birth, PROM, LBW, and VLBW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9650240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96502402022-11-15 Association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes: A retrospective cohort study Sun, Hanxiang Su, Xiujuan Liu, Yang Huang, Shijia Liu, Xiaosong Li, Guohua Du, Qiaoling Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the association of cervical disorders on obstetric outcomes of singleton pregnancies in China. METHODS: This hospital-based retrospective cohort study of women with live singleton births included 71,097 Chinese women. We compared the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in different types of pregnancies with cervical disorders with those with normal cervix. Logistic regression model was used to estimate the association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes. RESULTS: Women with cervical disorders had a higher risk of premature delivery (10.98 vs. 4.41%), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (3.48 vs. 1.62%), low birth weight (LBW) (7.62 vs. 2.92%) and very low birth weight (VLBW) (2.01 vs. 0.28%) than women with normal cervix. After adjusting for confounding factors, compared with women with normal cervix, women with high-grade abnormal cervical cytology are at greater risk of premature birth (adjusted OR 1.971, 95% CI: 1.302–2.983), premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (adjusted OR 1.379, 95% CI: 1.047–1.815), LBW (adjusted OR 1.790, 95% CI: 1.059–3.025), and VLBW (adjusted OR 4.519, 95% CI: 1.662–12.292) than women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology, and women with abnormal cervical cytology after treatment had a higher risk of premature birth (adjusted OR 2.060, 95% CI: 1.348–3.147), PROM (adjusted OR 1.381, 95% CI: 1.038–1.839), PPROM (adjusted OR 1.995, 95% CI: 1.022–3.892), LBW (adjusted OR 1.801, 95% CI: 1.046–3.102), and VLBW (adjusted OR 4.868, 95% CI: 1.788–13.255) than untreated women. CONCLUSIONS: Our research showed that pregnant women with cervical disorders were more likely to have premature delivery, PPROM, LBW, and VLBW. Moreover, pregnant women with high-grade abnormal cervical cytology and abnormal cervical cytology after treatment had a higher risk of premature birth, PROM, LBW, and VLBW. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9650240/ /pubmed/36388888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.981405 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sun, Su, Liu, Huang, Liu, Li and Du. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Sun, Hanxiang
Su, Xiujuan
Liu, Yang
Huang, Shijia
Liu, Xiaosong
Li, Guohua
Du, Qiaoling
Association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title Association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes: a retrospective cohort study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9650240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.981405
work_keys_str_mv AT sunhanxiang associationbetweencervicaldisordersandadverseobstetricoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT suxiujuan associationbetweencervicaldisordersandadverseobstetricoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liuyang associationbetweencervicaldisordersandadverseobstetricoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huangshijia associationbetweencervicaldisordersandadverseobstetricoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liuxiaosong associationbetweencervicaldisordersandadverseobstetricoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liguohua associationbetweencervicaldisordersandadverseobstetricoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT duqiaoling associationbetweencervicaldisordersandadverseobstetricoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy