Cargando…

Natural cycle increases the live-birth rate compared with hormone replacement treatment for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have compared the clinical outcomes between the two endometrial preparation methods: natural cycles (NCs) and hormone replacement treatment (HRT) before frozen embryo transfer, but the results were conflicting. In order to mitigate the potential effect of embryos per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaofang, Gao, Yan’e, Shi, Juanzi, Shi, Wenhao, Bai, Haiyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9650322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.969379
_version_ 1784827989462089728
author Li, Xiaofang
Gao, Yan’e
Shi, Juanzi
Shi, Wenhao
Bai, Haiyan
author_facet Li, Xiaofang
Gao, Yan’e
Shi, Juanzi
Shi, Wenhao
Bai, Haiyan
author_sort Li, Xiaofang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A number of studies have compared the clinical outcomes between the two endometrial preparation methods: natural cycles (NCs) and hormone replacement treatment (HRT) before frozen embryo transfer, but the results were conflicting. In order to mitigate the potential effect of embryos per se, several researchers have worked on this subject for euploid blastocyst transfer, but the results were still inconsistent. Therefore, the present study was aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes between HRT and NC for autologous single vitrified–warmed euploid blastocyst transfer based on our data. METHODS: A total of 598 frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer cycles in the assisted reproductive center of Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital from January 2014 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Women were stratified into the NC (n = 125) or HRT (n = 473) group according to the patient’s preference and the physician’s guidance. Multivariate regression models and subgroup analysis were constructed to analyze the association between endometrial preparation and live birth. RESULTS: Women in the NC group had a higher live birth rate (68.80% versus 58.35%, P = 0.034) and a lower risk of total pregnancy loss (8.51% versus 21.14%, P = 0.005) when compared with women in the HRT group. The biochemical pregnancy rate (75.20% versus 74.00%, P = 0.784) and clinical pregnancy rate (74.40% versus 69.98%, P = 0.334) were similar between the two groups (NC versus HRT). NC was associated with an increased odds of live birth compared with HRT by different multivariable analysis models (Model 1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57, 0.36 - 0.90; Model 2: aOR, 95%CI: 0.57, 0.35 - 0.92). In addition, the increased chance of live birth in the NC group was found in all subgroups. No major obstetrical complications and two malformation livebirths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In women undergoing single euploid frozen blastocyst transfers, the NC group was associated with a lower pregnancy loss rate and an ultimately higher live birth rate than the HRT group. Although HRT is convenient for both clinicians and patients, the lower live birth rate should be taken into account and NC might be the first choice of endometrial preparation method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9650322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96503222022-11-15 Natural cycle increases the live-birth rate compared with hormone replacement treatment for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer Li, Xiaofang Gao, Yan’e Shi, Juanzi Shi, Wenhao Bai, Haiyan Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: A number of studies have compared the clinical outcomes between the two endometrial preparation methods: natural cycles (NCs) and hormone replacement treatment (HRT) before frozen embryo transfer, but the results were conflicting. In order to mitigate the potential effect of embryos per se, several researchers have worked on this subject for euploid blastocyst transfer, but the results were still inconsistent. Therefore, the present study was aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes between HRT and NC for autologous single vitrified–warmed euploid blastocyst transfer based on our data. METHODS: A total of 598 frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer cycles in the assisted reproductive center of Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital from January 2014 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Women were stratified into the NC (n = 125) or HRT (n = 473) group according to the patient’s preference and the physician’s guidance. Multivariate regression models and subgroup analysis were constructed to analyze the association between endometrial preparation and live birth. RESULTS: Women in the NC group had a higher live birth rate (68.80% versus 58.35%, P = 0.034) and a lower risk of total pregnancy loss (8.51% versus 21.14%, P = 0.005) when compared with women in the HRT group. The biochemical pregnancy rate (75.20% versus 74.00%, P = 0.784) and clinical pregnancy rate (74.40% versus 69.98%, P = 0.334) were similar between the two groups (NC versus HRT). NC was associated with an increased odds of live birth compared with HRT by different multivariable analysis models (Model 1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57, 0.36 - 0.90; Model 2: aOR, 95%CI: 0.57, 0.35 - 0.92). In addition, the increased chance of live birth in the NC group was found in all subgroups. No major obstetrical complications and two malformation livebirths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In women undergoing single euploid frozen blastocyst transfers, the NC group was associated with a lower pregnancy loss rate and an ultimately higher live birth rate than the HRT group. Although HRT is convenient for both clinicians and patients, the lower live birth rate should be taken into account and NC might be the first choice of endometrial preparation method. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9650322/ /pubmed/36387864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.969379 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Gao, Shi, Shi and Bai https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Li, Xiaofang
Gao, Yan’e
Shi, Juanzi
Shi, Wenhao
Bai, Haiyan
Natural cycle increases the live-birth rate compared with hormone replacement treatment for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer
title Natural cycle increases the live-birth rate compared with hormone replacement treatment for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer
title_full Natural cycle increases the live-birth rate compared with hormone replacement treatment for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer
title_fullStr Natural cycle increases the live-birth rate compared with hormone replacement treatment for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer
title_full_unstemmed Natural cycle increases the live-birth rate compared with hormone replacement treatment for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer
title_short Natural cycle increases the live-birth rate compared with hormone replacement treatment for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer
title_sort natural cycle increases the live-birth rate compared with hormone replacement treatment for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9650322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.969379
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaofang naturalcycleincreasesthelivebirthratecomparedwithhormonereplacementtreatmentforfrozenthawedsingleeuploidblastocysttransfer
AT gaoyane naturalcycleincreasesthelivebirthratecomparedwithhormonereplacementtreatmentforfrozenthawedsingleeuploidblastocysttransfer
AT shijuanzi naturalcycleincreasesthelivebirthratecomparedwithhormonereplacementtreatmentforfrozenthawedsingleeuploidblastocysttransfer
AT shiwenhao naturalcycleincreasesthelivebirthratecomparedwithhormonereplacementtreatmentforfrozenthawedsingleeuploidblastocysttransfer
AT baihaiyan naturalcycleincreasesthelivebirthratecomparedwithhormonereplacementtreatmentforfrozenthawedsingleeuploidblastocysttransfer