Cargando…

Mid-upper arm circumference as a substitute for body mass index in the assessment of nutritional status among adults in eastern Sudan

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) remains the most used indicator of nutritional status despite the presence of a potentially credible alternative. Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is an anthropometric measure that requires simple equipment and minimal training. The aim of this study was to compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musa, Imad R., Omar, Saeed M., Adam, Ishag
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9650816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36357916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14536-4
_version_ 1784828107203543040
author Musa, Imad R.
Omar, Saeed M.
Adam, Ishag
author_facet Musa, Imad R.
Omar, Saeed M.
Adam, Ishag
author_sort Musa, Imad R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) remains the most used indicator of nutritional status despite the presence of a potentially credible alternative. Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is an anthropometric measure that requires simple equipment and minimal training. The aim of this study was to compare MUAC with BMI and propose a MUAC cut-off point corresponding to a BMI of < 18.5 kg/m(2) (underweight) and ≥ 30.0 kg/m(2) (obesity) among Sudanese adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using multistage cluster sampling was conducted in New-Halfa, eastern Sudan. Participants’ age and sex were recorded and their MUAC, weight and height were measured using the standard procedures. The MUAC (cm) cut-offs corresponding to < 18.5 kg/m(2) and ≥ 30.0 kg/m(2) were calculated and determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis RESULTS: Five hundreds and fifty-two adults were enrolled in the study. The median (interquartile range, IQR) of the participants age was 31.0 (24.0 – 40.0) years and 331 (60.0%) of them were females. The medians (IQR) of BMI and MUAC were 22.4 (19.1 – 26.3) kg/m(2) and 25.0 (23.0 – 28.0) cm, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between MUAC and BMI (r = 0.673, p < 0.001). Of the 552 enrolled participants, 104 (18.8%), 282 (51.1%), 89 (16.1%) and 77 (13.9%) were normal weight, underweight, overweight and obese, respectively. Best statistically derived MUAC cut-off corresponding to a BMI < 18.5 kg/m(2) (underweight) was ≤ 25.5 cm in both males and females (Youden’s Index, YI = 0.51; sensitivity = 96.0%; specificity = 54.0%), with a good predictive value (AUROCC = 0.82). Best statistically derived MUAC cut-off corresponding to a BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m(2) (obesity) was ≥ 29.5 cm in both males and females (YI = 0.62, sensitivity = 70.3%, specificity = 92.0%), with a good predictive value (AUROCC = 0.86, 95.0% CI = 0.76 – 0.95). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the cut-offs based on MUAC can be used for community-based screening of underweight and obesity
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9650816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96508162022-11-15 Mid-upper arm circumference as a substitute for body mass index in the assessment of nutritional status among adults in eastern Sudan Musa, Imad R. Omar, Saeed M. Adam, Ishag BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) remains the most used indicator of nutritional status despite the presence of a potentially credible alternative. Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is an anthropometric measure that requires simple equipment and minimal training. The aim of this study was to compare MUAC with BMI and propose a MUAC cut-off point corresponding to a BMI of < 18.5 kg/m(2) (underweight) and ≥ 30.0 kg/m(2) (obesity) among Sudanese adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using multistage cluster sampling was conducted in New-Halfa, eastern Sudan. Participants’ age and sex were recorded and their MUAC, weight and height were measured using the standard procedures. The MUAC (cm) cut-offs corresponding to < 18.5 kg/m(2) and ≥ 30.0 kg/m(2) were calculated and determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis RESULTS: Five hundreds and fifty-two adults were enrolled in the study. The median (interquartile range, IQR) of the participants age was 31.0 (24.0 – 40.0) years and 331 (60.0%) of them were females. The medians (IQR) of BMI and MUAC were 22.4 (19.1 – 26.3) kg/m(2) and 25.0 (23.0 – 28.0) cm, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between MUAC and BMI (r = 0.673, p < 0.001). Of the 552 enrolled participants, 104 (18.8%), 282 (51.1%), 89 (16.1%) and 77 (13.9%) were normal weight, underweight, overweight and obese, respectively. Best statistically derived MUAC cut-off corresponding to a BMI < 18.5 kg/m(2) (underweight) was ≤ 25.5 cm in both males and females (Youden’s Index, YI = 0.51; sensitivity = 96.0%; specificity = 54.0%), with a good predictive value (AUROCC = 0.82). Best statistically derived MUAC cut-off corresponding to a BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m(2) (obesity) was ≥ 29.5 cm in both males and females (YI = 0.62, sensitivity = 70.3%, specificity = 92.0%), with a good predictive value (AUROCC = 0.86, 95.0% CI = 0.76 – 0.95). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the cut-offs based on MUAC can be used for community-based screening of underweight and obesity BioMed Central 2022-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9650816/ /pubmed/36357916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14536-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Musa, Imad R.
Omar, Saeed M.
Adam, Ishag
Mid-upper arm circumference as a substitute for body mass index in the assessment of nutritional status among adults in eastern Sudan
title Mid-upper arm circumference as a substitute for body mass index in the assessment of nutritional status among adults in eastern Sudan
title_full Mid-upper arm circumference as a substitute for body mass index in the assessment of nutritional status among adults in eastern Sudan
title_fullStr Mid-upper arm circumference as a substitute for body mass index in the assessment of nutritional status among adults in eastern Sudan
title_full_unstemmed Mid-upper arm circumference as a substitute for body mass index in the assessment of nutritional status among adults in eastern Sudan
title_short Mid-upper arm circumference as a substitute for body mass index in the assessment of nutritional status among adults in eastern Sudan
title_sort mid-upper arm circumference as a substitute for body mass index in the assessment of nutritional status among adults in eastern sudan
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9650816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36357916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14536-4
work_keys_str_mv AT musaimadr midupperarmcircumferenceasasubstituteforbodymassindexintheassessmentofnutritionalstatusamongadultsineasternsudan
AT omarsaeedm midupperarmcircumferenceasasubstituteforbodymassindexintheassessmentofnutritionalstatusamongadultsineasternsudan
AT adamishag midupperarmcircumferenceasasubstituteforbodymassindexintheassessmentofnutritionalstatusamongadultsineasternsudan