Cargando…

ScanFold 2.0: a rapid approach for identifying potential structured RNA targets in genomes and transcriptomes

A major limiting factor in target discovery for both basic research and therapeutic intervention is the identification of structural and/or functional RNA elements in genomes and transcriptomes. This was the impetus for the original ScanFold algorithm, which provides maps of local RNA structural sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrews, Ryan J., Rouse, Warren B., O’Leary, Collin A., Booher, Nicholas J., Moss, Walter N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389431
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14361
Descripción
Sumario:A major limiting factor in target discovery for both basic research and therapeutic intervention is the identification of structural and/or functional RNA elements in genomes and transcriptomes. This was the impetus for the original ScanFold algorithm, which provides maps of local RNA structural stability, evidence of sequence-ordered (potentially evolved) structure, and unique model structures comprised of recurring base pairs with the greatest structural bias. A key step in quantifying this propensity for ordered structure is the prediction of secondary structural stability for randomized sequences which, in the original implementation of ScanFold, is explicitly evaluated. This slow process has limited the rapid identification of ordered structures in large genomes/transcriptomes, which we seek to overcome in this current work introducing ScanFold 2.0. In this revised version of ScanFold, we no longer explicitly evaluate randomized sequence folding energy, but rather estimate it using a machine learning approach. For high randomization numbers, this can increase prediction speeds over 100-fold compared to ScanFold 1.0, allowing for the analysis of large sequences, as well as the use of additional folding algorithms that may be computationally expensive. In the testing of ScanFold 2.0, we re-evaluate the Zika, HIV, and SARS-CoV-2 genomes and compare both the consistency of results and the time of each run to ScanFold 1.0. We also re-evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 genome to assess the quality of ScanFold 2.0 predictions vs several biochemical structure probing datasets and compare the results to those of the original ScanFold program.