Cargando…

Patient satisfaction and cost savings analysis of the telemedicine program within a neuro-oncology department

PURPOSE: Unique challenges exist in the utilization of telemedicine for neurological and surgical specialties. We examined the differences in patient satisfaction for telemedicine versus in-person visits within a Neuro-Oncology Program to assess whether there was a difference between surgical and me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, James K. C., Kang, Richard, Bilenkin, Arkady, Prorok, Rachel, Whiting, Junmin, Patel, Krupal B., Beer-Furlan, Andre, Naso, Cristina, Rogers, Andrea, Castro, Xavier Baez, Peguero, Edwin, Mokhtari, Sepideh, Tran, Nam, Etame, Arnold, Pina, Yolanda, Spiess, Philippe E., Forsyth, Peter, Vogelbaum, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04173-7
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Unique challenges exist in the utilization of telemedicine for neurological and surgical specialties. We examined the differences in patient satisfaction for telemedicine versus in-person visits within a Neuro-Oncology Program to assess whether there was a difference between surgical and medical specialties. We also examined the potential cost savings benefits of utilizing telemedicine. METHODS: 1189 Press Ganey surveys in the Department of Neuro-Oncology (982 in-person and 207 telemedicine) by surgical and medical neuro-oncology patients between 04/01/2020 and 06/30/2021 were reviewed. Survey results were divided into 4 categories (Access, Provider, Technology (telemedicine only), and Overall Satisfaction). Results were analyzed for the impact of telemedicine versus in-person visits, and gender, age, insurance, and specialty. Cost savings were calculated based on potential travel distance and lost productivity. RESULTS: Survey results from telemedicine visits demonstrated that patients with private insurance returned higher scores in the Provider (p = 0.0089), Technology (p = 0.00187), and Overall (p = 0.00382) categories. Surgical patients returned higher scores for Access (p = 0.0015), Technology (p = 0.0002), and Overall (p = 0.0019). When comparing telemedicine to in-person scores, in-person scored higher in Provider (p = 0.0092) for all patients, while in-person scored higher in Access (p = 0.0252) amongst surgical patients. Cost analysis revealed that telemedicine allowed patients to save an average of 4.1 to 5.6 h per visit time and a potential cost savings of up to $223.3 ± 171.4. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine yields equivalent patient satisfaction when employed in surgical as compared to medical Neuro-Oncology patients with the potential to lessen the financial and time burden on neuro-oncology patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-022-04173-7