Cargando…

Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION: Clinicians raise at least one question for every two patients they see, but search for an answer to less than half of these questions, and rarely use evidence-based resources. One barrier to evidence-based practice is doubt that the search would yield an answer, and we found insufficie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viegas Dias, Catarina, Jasmins, Clara, Rodrigues, David, Heleno, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277462
_version_ 1784828258556051456
author Viegas Dias, Catarina
Jasmins, Clara
Rodrigues, David
Heleno, Bruno
author_facet Viegas Dias, Catarina
Jasmins, Clara
Rodrigues, David
Heleno, Bruno
author_sort Viegas Dias, Catarina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinicians raise at least one question for every two patients they see, but search for an answer to less than half of these questions, and rarely use evidence-based resources. One barrier to evidence-based practice is doubt that the search would yield an answer, and we found insufficient evidence to refute this concern. This study aims to identify what proportion of clinical questions in primary care can be answered with online evidence-based practice resources, and what proportion of these can be answered with pre-appraised evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study in two primary care practices. The inclusion criteria were family doctors, generalists and residents working in 2 selected practices. We collected a total of 238 questions from 19 family medicine specialists, 9 family medicine residents and 3 generalist doctors. Doctors were asked to record any clinical question that arose during 4 days of appointments. The primary outcome was the proportion of clinical questions answered with online evidence-based practice resources. The secondary outcome was the level of evidence needed to reach to find the answers (clinical summaries, systematic guidelines, systematic reviews or primary studies), according to Haynes’ pre-appraised evidence pyramid model. RESULTS: 191 of the 206 valid clinical questions could be answered with online evidence-based practice resources (92.7% [95% CI 88.3%-95.9%]). Most of these questions (90.8% CI 95% 85.9%-94.4%) were successfully answered using clinical summaries (BMJ Best Practice, DynaMed or UpToDate), with a median search time of 4 minutes (range 1–16.5). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to clinician’s beliefs, the majority of clinical questions can be answered with online evidence-based practice resources, and most of them with pre-appraised evidence. This study could encourage family doctors to increase the use of clinical summaries. Furthermore, these results highlight the importance of teaching how to search for and apply pre-appraised evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9651552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96515522022-11-15 Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study Viegas Dias, Catarina Jasmins, Clara Rodrigues, David Heleno, Bruno PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Clinicians raise at least one question for every two patients they see, but search for an answer to less than half of these questions, and rarely use evidence-based resources. One barrier to evidence-based practice is doubt that the search would yield an answer, and we found insufficient evidence to refute this concern. This study aims to identify what proportion of clinical questions in primary care can be answered with online evidence-based practice resources, and what proportion of these can be answered with pre-appraised evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study in two primary care practices. The inclusion criteria were family doctors, generalists and residents working in 2 selected practices. We collected a total of 238 questions from 19 family medicine specialists, 9 family medicine residents and 3 generalist doctors. Doctors were asked to record any clinical question that arose during 4 days of appointments. The primary outcome was the proportion of clinical questions answered with online evidence-based practice resources. The secondary outcome was the level of evidence needed to reach to find the answers (clinical summaries, systematic guidelines, systematic reviews or primary studies), according to Haynes’ pre-appraised evidence pyramid model. RESULTS: 191 of the 206 valid clinical questions could be answered with online evidence-based practice resources (92.7% [95% CI 88.3%-95.9%]). Most of these questions (90.8% CI 95% 85.9%-94.4%) were successfully answered using clinical summaries (BMJ Best Practice, DynaMed or UpToDate), with a median search time of 4 minutes (range 1–16.5). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to clinician’s beliefs, the majority of clinical questions can be answered with online evidence-based practice resources, and most of them with pre-appraised evidence. This study could encourage family doctors to increase the use of clinical summaries. Furthermore, these results highlight the importance of teaching how to search for and apply pre-appraised evidence. Public Library of Science 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9651552/ /pubmed/36367905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277462 Text en © 2022 Viegas Dias et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Viegas Dias, Catarina
Jasmins, Clara
Rodrigues, David
Heleno, Bruno
Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study
title Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study
title_full Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study
title_short Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study
title_sort clinical questions in primary care: where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277462
work_keys_str_mv AT viegasdiascatarina clinicalquestionsinprimarycarewheretofindtheanswersacrosssectionalstudy
AT jasminsclara clinicalquestionsinprimarycarewheretofindtheanswersacrosssectionalstudy
AT rodriguesdavid clinicalquestionsinprimarycarewheretofindtheanswersacrosssectionalstudy
AT helenobruno clinicalquestionsinprimarycarewheretofindtheanswersacrosssectionalstudy