Cargando…
Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study
INTRODUCTION: Clinicians raise at least one question for every two patients they see, but search for an answer to less than half of these questions, and rarely use evidence-based resources. One barrier to evidence-based practice is doubt that the search would yield an answer, and we found insufficie...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277462 |
_version_ | 1784828258556051456 |
---|---|
author | Viegas Dias, Catarina Jasmins, Clara Rodrigues, David Heleno, Bruno |
author_facet | Viegas Dias, Catarina Jasmins, Clara Rodrigues, David Heleno, Bruno |
author_sort | Viegas Dias, Catarina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinicians raise at least one question for every two patients they see, but search for an answer to less than half of these questions, and rarely use evidence-based resources. One barrier to evidence-based practice is doubt that the search would yield an answer, and we found insufficient evidence to refute this concern. This study aims to identify what proportion of clinical questions in primary care can be answered with online evidence-based practice resources, and what proportion of these can be answered with pre-appraised evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study in two primary care practices. The inclusion criteria were family doctors, generalists and residents working in 2 selected practices. We collected a total of 238 questions from 19 family medicine specialists, 9 family medicine residents and 3 generalist doctors. Doctors were asked to record any clinical question that arose during 4 days of appointments. The primary outcome was the proportion of clinical questions answered with online evidence-based practice resources. The secondary outcome was the level of evidence needed to reach to find the answers (clinical summaries, systematic guidelines, systematic reviews or primary studies), according to Haynes’ pre-appraised evidence pyramid model. RESULTS: 191 of the 206 valid clinical questions could be answered with online evidence-based practice resources (92.7% [95% CI 88.3%-95.9%]). Most of these questions (90.8% CI 95% 85.9%-94.4%) were successfully answered using clinical summaries (BMJ Best Practice, DynaMed or UpToDate), with a median search time of 4 minutes (range 1–16.5). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to clinician’s beliefs, the majority of clinical questions can be answered with online evidence-based practice resources, and most of them with pre-appraised evidence. This study could encourage family doctors to increase the use of clinical summaries. Furthermore, these results highlight the importance of teaching how to search for and apply pre-appraised evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9651552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96515522022-11-15 Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study Viegas Dias, Catarina Jasmins, Clara Rodrigues, David Heleno, Bruno PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Clinicians raise at least one question for every two patients they see, but search for an answer to less than half of these questions, and rarely use evidence-based resources. One barrier to evidence-based practice is doubt that the search would yield an answer, and we found insufficient evidence to refute this concern. This study aims to identify what proportion of clinical questions in primary care can be answered with online evidence-based practice resources, and what proportion of these can be answered with pre-appraised evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study in two primary care practices. The inclusion criteria were family doctors, generalists and residents working in 2 selected practices. We collected a total of 238 questions from 19 family medicine specialists, 9 family medicine residents and 3 generalist doctors. Doctors were asked to record any clinical question that arose during 4 days of appointments. The primary outcome was the proportion of clinical questions answered with online evidence-based practice resources. The secondary outcome was the level of evidence needed to reach to find the answers (clinical summaries, systematic guidelines, systematic reviews or primary studies), according to Haynes’ pre-appraised evidence pyramid model. RESULTS: 191 of the 206 valid clinical questions could be answered with online evidence-based practice resources (92.7% [95% CI 88.3%-95.9%]). Most of these questions (90.8% CI 95% 85.9%-94.4%) were successfully answered using clinical summaries (BMJ Best Practice, DynaMed or UpToDate), with a median search time of 4 minutes (range 1–16.5). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to clinician’s beliefs, the majority of clinical questions can be answered with online evidence-based practice resources, and most of them with pre-appraised evidence. This study could encourage family doctors to increase the use of clinical summaries. Furthermore, these results highlight the importance of teaching how to search for and apply pre-appraised evidence. Public Library of Science 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9651552/ /pubmed/36367905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277462 Text en © 2022 Viegas Dias et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Viegas Dias, Catarina Jasmins, Clara Rodrigues, David Heleno, Bruno Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study |
title | Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Clinical questions in primary care: Where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | clinical questions in primary care: where to find the answers - a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277462 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT viegasdiascatarina clinicalquestionsinprimarycarewheretofindtheanswersacrosssectionalstudy AT jasminsclara clinicalquestionsinprimarycarewheretofindtheanswersacrosssectionalstudy AT rodriguesdavid clinicalquestionsinprimarycarewheretofindtheanswersacrosssectionalstudy AT helenobruno clinicalquestionsinprimarycarewheretofindtheanswersacrosssectionalstudy |