Cargando…
Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement
This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) length prediction formula using only anteroposterior chest radiographs (AP-CXR) and the technical feasibility of bedside ultrasound-guided PICC placement. This study included 156 Asian adult patients who u...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277526 |
_version_ | 1784828259060416512 |
---|---|
author | Cho, Youngjong Lee, Sangjoon Park, Sung-Joon Lee, Hyoung Nam Chung, Hwan Hoon |
author_facet | Cho, Youngjong Lee, Sangjoon Park, Sung-Joon Lee, Hyoung Nam Chung, Hwan Hoon |
author_sort | Cho, Youngjong |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) length prediction formula using only anteroposterior chest radiographs (AP-CXR) and the technical feasibility of bedside ultrasound-guided PICC placement. This study included 156 Asian adult patients who underwent bedside PICC placement at three hospitals from September 2021 to March 2022. The shortest straight-line distance from the cubital crease to the puncture point (CP) was measured first. Using the formula of a previous study, the CP + estimated PICC length (eCL) was calculated with the parameters measured on AP-CXR. The formula was as follows: 19.409 + 0.424 × (MHTD, maximal horizontal thoracic diameter) + 0.287 × (CL, clavicle length) + 0.203 × (DTV, distance of thoracic vertebrae) + (2VBUs, two vertebral body units below the carina inferior border) (if from the left, 3.063cm was added; if female, 0.997cm was subtracted). Catheters were pretrimmed according to calculated eCL prior to the procedure. Technical success was evaluated, and the validation success of catheter length prediction was classified according to the catheter tip position as follows: optimal position or suboptimal position. Technical success was achieved in 153 cases (98.1%). Evaluation of validation success revealed that the position was “optimal” in 108 cases (70.6%) and “suboptimal” in 45 cases (29.4%). There was no validation failure. There was no case where the catheter was inserted too deep as to wedge into the right atrial wall. In conclusion, the PICC could be positioned accurately using the formula based on only AP-CXR. Furthermore, this bedside procedure was technically feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9651554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96515542022-11-15 Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement Cho, Youngjong Lee, Sangjoon Park, Sung-Joon Lee, Hyoung Nam Chung, Hwan Hoon PLoS One Research Article This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) length prediction formula using only anteroposterior chest radiographs (AP-CXR) and the technical feasibility of bedside ultrasound-guided PICC placement. This study included 156 Asian adult patients who underwent bedside PICC placement at three hospitals from September 2021 to March 2022. The shortest straight-line distance from the cubital crease to the puncture point (CP) was measured first. Using the formula of a previous study, the CP + estimated PICC length (eCL) was calculated with the parameters measured on AP-CXR. The formula was as follows: 19.409 + 0.424 × (MHTD, maximal horizontal thoracic diameter) + 0.287 × (CL, clavicle length) + 0.203 × (DTV, distance of thoracic vertebrae) + (2VBUs, two vertebral body units below the carina inferior border) (if from the left, 3.063cm was added; if female, 0.997cm was subtracted). Catheters were pretrimmed according to calculated eCL prior to the procedure. Technical success was evaluated, and the validation success of catheter length prediction was classified according to the catheter tip position as follows: optimal position or suboptimal position. Technical success was achieved in 153 cases (98.1%). Evaluation of validation success revealed that the position was “optimal” in 108 cases (70.6%) and “suboptimal” in 45 cases (29.4%). There was no validation failure. There was no case where the catheter was inserted too deep as to wedge into the right atrial wall. In conclusion, the PICC could be positioned accurately using the formula based on only AP-CXR. Furthermore, this bedside procedure was technically feasible. Public Library of Science 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9651554/ /pubmed/36367880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277526 Text en © 2022 Cho et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cho, Youngjong Lee, Sangjoon Park, Sung-Joon Lee, Hyoung Nam Chung, Hwan Hoon Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement |
title | Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement |
title_full | Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement |
title_fullStr | Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement |
title_short | Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement |
title_sort | validation of the picc length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277526 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choyoungjong validationofthepicclengthpredictionformulabasedonanteroposteriorchestradiographsforbedsideultrasoundguidedplacement AT leesangjoon validationofthepicclengthpredictionformulabasedonanteroposteriorchestradiographsforbedsideultrasoundguidedplacement AT parksungjoon validationofthepicclengthpredictionformulabasedonanteroposteriorchestradiographsforbedsideultrasoundguidedplacement AT leehyoungnam validationofthepicclengthpredictionformulabasedonanteroposteriorchestradiographsforbedsideultrasoundguidedplacement AT chunghwanhoon validationofthepicclengthpredictionformulabasedonanteroposteriorchestradiographsforbedsideultrasoundguidedplacement |