Cargando…

Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement

This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) length prediction formula using only anteroposterior chest radiographs (AP-CXR) and the technical feasibility of bedside ultrasound-guided PICC placement. This study included 156 Asian adult patients who u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Youngjong, Lee, Sangjoon, Park, Sung-Joon, Lee, Hyoung Nam, Chung, Hwan Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277526
_version_ 1784828259060416512
author Cho, Youngjong
Lee, Sangjoon
Park, Sung-Joon
Lee, Hyoung Nam
Chung, Hwan Hoon
author_facet Cho, Youngjong
Lee, Sangjoon
Park, Sung-Joon
Lee, Hyoung Nam
Chung, Hwan Hoon
author_sort Cho, Youngjong
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) length prediction formula using only anteroposterior chest radiographs (AP-CXR) and the technical feasibility of bedside ultrasound-guided PICC placement. This study included 156 Asian adult patients who underwent bedside PICC placement at three hospitals from September 2021 to March 2022. The shortest straight-line distance from the cubital crease to the puncture point (CP) was measured first. Using the formula of a previous study, the CP + estimated PICC length (eCL) was calculated with the parameters measured on AP-CXR. The formula was as follows: 19.409 + 0.424 × (MHTD, maximal horizontal thoracic diameter) + 0.287 × (CL, clavicle length) + 0.203 × (DTV, distance of thoracic vertebrae) + (2VBUs, two vertebral body units below the carina inferior border) (if from the left, 3.063cm was added; if female, 0.997cm was subtracted). Catheters were pretrimmed according to calculated eCL prior to the procedure. Technical success was evaluated, and the validation success of catheter length prediction was classified according to the catheter tip position as follows: optimal position or suboptimal position. Technical success was achieved in 153 cases (98.1%). Evaluation of validation success revealed that the position was “optimal” in 108 cases (70.6%) and “suboptimal” in 45 cases (29.4%). There was no validation failure. There was no case where the catheter was inserted too deep as to wedge into the right atrial wall. In conclusion, the PICC could be positioned accurately using the formula based on only AP-CXR. Furthermore, this bedside procedure was technically feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9651554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96515542022-11-15 Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement Cho, Youngjong Lee, Sangjoon Park, Sung-Joon Lee, Hyoung Nam Chung, Hwan Hoon PLoS One Research Article This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) length prediction formula using only anteroposterior chest radiographs (AP-CXR) and the technical feasibility of bedside ultrasound-guided PICC placement. This study included 156 Asian adult patients who underwent bedside PICC placement at three hospitals from September 2021 to March 2022. The shortest straight-line distance from the cubital crease to the puncture point (CP) was measured first. Using the formula of a previous study, the CP + estimated PICC length (eCL) was calculated with the parameters measured on AP-CXR. The formula was as follows: 19.409 + 0.424 × (MHTD, maximal horizontal thoracic diameter) + 0.287 × (CL, clavicle length) + 0.203 × (DTV, distance of thoracic vertebrae) + (2VBUs, two vertebral body units below the carina inferior border) (if from the left, 3.063cm was added; if female, 0.997cm was subtracted). Catheters were pretrimmed according to calculated eCL prior to the procedure. Technical success was evaluated, and the validation success of catheter length prediction was classified according to the catheter tip position as follows: optimal position or suboptimal position. Technical success was achieved in 153 cases (98.1%). Evaluation of validation success revealed that the position was “optimal” in 108 cases (70.6%) and “suboptimal” in 45 cases (29.4%). There was no validation failure. There was no case where the catheter was inserted too deep as to wedge into the right atrial wall. In conclusion, the PICC could be positioned accurately using the formula based on only AP-CXR. Furthermore, this bedside procedure was technically feasible. Public Library of Science 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9651554/ /pubmed/36367880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277526 Text en © 2022 Cho et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cho, Youngjong
Lee, Sangjoon
Park, Sung-Joon
Lee, Hyoung Nam
Chung, Hwan Hoon
Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement
title Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement
title_full Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement
title_fullStr Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement
title_short Validation of the PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement
title_sort validation of the picc length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for bedside ultrasound-guided placement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36367880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277526
work_keys_str_mv AT choyoungjong validationofthepicclengthpredictionformulabasedonanteroposteriorchestradiographsforbedsideultrasoundguidedplacement
AT leesangjoon validationofthepicclengthpredictionformulabasedonanteroposteriorchestradiographsforbedsideultrasoundguidedplacement
AT parksungjoon validationofthepicclengthpredictionformulabasedonanteroposteriorchestradiographsforbedsideultrasoundguidedplacement
AT leehyoungnam validationofthepicclengthpredictionformulabasedonanteroposteriorchestradiographsforbedsideultrasoundguidedplacement
AT chunghwanhoon validationofthepicclengthpredictionformulabasedonanteroposteriorchestradiographsforbedsideultrasoundguidedplacement