Cargando…

The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate the clinical impact of vision rehabilitation in patients with vision impairment and (2) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a basic vision rehabilitation service in Portugal. METHODS: The trial recruited patients diagnosed with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernández-Moreno, Laura, Senra, Hugo, Marques, Ana Patricia, Perdomo, Natacha Moreno, Macedo, Antonio Filipe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36369618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00600-0
_version_ 1784828332870729728
author Hernández-Moreno, Laura
Senra, Hugo
Marques, Ana Patricia
Perdomo, Natacha Moreno
Macedo, Antonio Filipe
author_facet Hernández-Moreno, Laura
Senra, Hugo
Marques, Ana Patricia
Perdomo, Natacha Moreno
Macedo, Antonio Filipe
author_sort Hernández-Moreno, Laura
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate the clinical impact of vision rehabilitation in patients with vision impairment and (2) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a basic vision rehabilitation service in Portugal. METHODS: The trial recruited patients diagnosed with age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy (DR) and visual acuity in the range 0.4–1.0logMAR in the better-seeing eye. Participants were randomised to one of the study arms consisting of immediate intervention and delayed intervention. The intervention included: new refractive correction, optical reading aids, in-office training and advice about modifications at home. Visual ability, health-related quality of life and costs were measured. Economic analysis was performed to evaluate whether the intervention was cost-effective. The trial compared the outcomes 12 weeks after the start in both arms. RESULTS: Of the 46 participants, 34 (74%) were diagnosed with DR, 25 (54%) were female, and mean age was 70.08 years (SD = 8.74). In the immediate intervention arm visual ability increased a mean of 0.523 logits (SE = 0.11) (p < 0.001). Changes in the delayed intervention arm were not statistically significant (p = 0.95). Acuity in the better-seeing eye, near acuity and critical print size also improved during the study. The mean cost of the intervention was €118.79 (SD = 24.37). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using the EQ-5D-5L was 30,421€/QALY and 1186€/QALY when using near acuity. CONCLUSION: The current study gives evidence of positive clinical impact of a basic vision rehabilitation intervention and shows that a basic vision rehabilitation service is cost-effective. These findings are important to clinical and rehabilitation practices and for planning vision rehabilitation services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered, 21/01/2019. ISRCTN10894889, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10894889
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9651903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96519032022-11-14 The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal Hernández-Moreno, Laura Senra, Hugo Marques, Ana Patricia Perdomo, Natacha Moreno Macedo, Antonio Filipe Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate the clinical impact of vision rehabilitation in patients with vision impairment and (2) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a basic vision rehabilitation service in Portugal. METHODS: The trial recruited patients diagnosed with age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy (DR) and visual acuity in the range 0.4–1.0logMAR in the better-seeing eye. Participants were randomised to one of the study arms consisting of immediate intervention and delayed intervention. The intervention included: new refractive correction, optical reading aids, in-office training and advice about modifications at home. Visual ability, health-related quality of life and costs were measured. Economic analysis was performed to evaluate whether the intervention was cost-effective. The trial compared the outcomes 12 weeks after the start in both arms. RESULTS: Of the 46 participants, 34 (74%) were diagnosed with DR, 25 (54%) were female, and mean age was 70.08 years (SD = 8.74). In the immediate intervention arm visual ability increased a mean of 0.523 logits (SE = 0.11) (p < 0.001). Changes in the delayed intervention arm were not statistically significant (p = 0.95). Acuity in the better-seeing eye, near acuity and critical print size also improved during the study. The mean cost of the intervention was €118.79 (SD = 24.37). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using the EQ-5D-5L was 30,421€/QALY and 1186€/QALY when using near acuity. CONCLUSION: The current study gives evidence of positive clinical impact of a basic vision rehabilitation intervention and shows that a basic vision rehabilitation service is cost-effective. These findings are important to clinical and rehabilitation practices and for planning vision rehabilitation services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered, 21/01/2019. ISRCTN10894889, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10894889 Springer Healthcare 2022-11-11 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9651903/ /pubmed/36369618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00600-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Hernández-Moreno, Laura
Senra, Hugo
Marques, Ana Patricia
Perdomo, Natacha Moreno
Macedo, Antonio Filipe
The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal
title The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal
title_full The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal
title_fullStr The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal
title_short The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal
title_sort basic vrs-effect study: clinical trial outcomes and cost-effectiveness of low vision rehabilitation in portugal
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9651903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36369618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00600-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezmorenolaura thebasicvrseffectstudyclinicaltrialoutcomesandcosteffectivenessoflowvisionrehabilitationinportugal
AT senrahugo thebasicvrseffectstudyclinicaltrialoutcomesandcosteffectivenessoflowvisionrehabilitationinportugal
AT marquesanapatricia thebasicvrseffectstudyclinicaltrialoutcomesandcosteffectivenessoflowvisionrehabilitationinportugal
AT perdomonatachamoreno thebasicvrseffectstudyclinicaltrialoutcomesandcosteffectivenessoflowvisionrehabilitationinportugal
AT macedoantoniofilipe thebasicvrseffectstudyclinicaltrialoutcomesandcosteffectivenessoflowvisionrehabilitationinportugal
AT hernandezmorenolaura basicvrseffectstudyclinicaltrialoutcomesandcosteffectivenessoflowvisionrehabilitationinportugal
AT senrahugo basicvrseffectstudyclinicaltrialoutcomesandcosteffectivenessoflowvisionrehabilitationinportugal
AT marquesanapatricia basicvrseffectstudyclinicaltrialoutcomesandcosteffectivenessoflowvisionrehabilitationinportugal
AT perdomonatachamoreno basicvrseffectstudyclinicaltrialoutcomesandcosteffectivenessoflowvisionrehabilitationinportugal
AT macedoantoniofilipe basicvrseffectstudyclinicaltrialoutcomesandcosteffectivenessoflowvisionrehabilitationinportugal