Cargando…

Effects of Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel Compared with Optimized Medical Treatment on Nonmotor Symptoms in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: INSIGHTS Study

BACKGROUND: Nonmotor symptoms (NMS) are common in advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) and reduce health-related quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) versus optimized medical treatment (OMT) on NMS in APD. METHODS: INSIGHTS was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Sun Ju, Calopa, Matilde, Ceravolo, Maria G., Tambasco, Nicola, Antonini, Angelo, Chaudhuri, K. Ray, Robieson, Weining Z., Sánchez-Soliño, Olga, Zadikoff, Cindy, Jin, Man, Barbato, Luigi M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1216975
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Nonmotor symptoms (NMS) are common in advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) and reduce health-related quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) versus optimized medical treatment (OMT) on NMS in APD. METHODS: INSIGHTS was a phase 3b, open-label, randomized, multicenter study in patients with APD (LCIG or OMT, 26 weeks) (NCT02549092). Primary outcomes assessed were total NMS (NMS scale (NMSS) and PD sleep scale (PDSS-2)). Key secondary outcomes included the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II, Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and PD Questionnaire-8 (PDQ-8). Additional secondary measures of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS), and Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS) also were evaluated. Finally, safety was assessed. RESULTS: Out of 89 patients randomized, 87 were included in the analysis (LCIG, n = 43; OMT, n = 44). There were no significant differences in NMSS or PDSS-2 total score changes (baseline to Week 26) between LCIG and OMT; within-group changes were significant for NMSS (LCIG, p < 0.001; OMT, p = 0.005) and PDSS-2 (LCIG, p < 0.001; OMT, p < 0.001). Between-group treatment differences were nominally significant for UPDRS Part II (p = 0.006) and CGI-C (p < 0.001) at Week 26 in favor of LCIG; however, statistical significance could not be claimed in light of primary efficacy outcomes. PGIC (Week 26) and KPPS (Week 12) scores were nominally significantly reduced with LCIG versus OMT (p < 0.001; p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in PDQ-8 or PAS. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly mild to moderate; common serious AEs were pneumoperitoneum (n = 2) and stoma-site infection (n = 2) (LCIG). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between LCIG versus OMT in NMSS or PDSS-2; both LCIG and OMT groups significantly improved from baseline. AEs were consistent with the known safety profile.