Cargando…

Establishment of Difficult Caudal Epidural Blockade Prediction Model

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a predictive difficult caudal epidural blockade (pDCEB) model when ultrasound was not available and verified the role of ultrasound in difficult caudal epidural blockade (CEB). METHODS: From October 2018 to March 2019, this study consisted of three phases. First, we p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Guohao, Zhao, Jialian, Chu, Lihua, Song, Shengwen, Wang, Ya, Lai, Dengming, Cheng, Baoli, Fang, Xiangming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2037904
_version_ 1784828387313844224
author Xie, Guohao
Zhao, Jialian
Chu, Lihua
Song, Shengwen
Wang, Ya
Lai, Dengming
Cheng, Baoli
Fang, Xiangming
author_facet Xie, Guohao
Zhao, Jialian
Chu, Lihua
Song, Shengwen
Wang, Ya
Lai, Dengming
Cheng, Baoli
Fang, Xiangming
author_sort Xie, Guohao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a predictive difficult caudal epidural blockade (pDCEB) model when ultrasound was not available and verified the role of ultrasound in difficult caudal epidural blockade (CEB). METHODS: From October 2018 to March 2019, this study consisted of three phases. First, we prospectively enrolled 202 patients scheduled to undergo caudal epidural anesthesia and assessed risk factors by binary logistic regression to develop the predictive scoring system. Second, we enrolled 87 patients to validate it. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of the prediction model. Youden-index was used to determine the cut-off value. Third, we enrolled 68 patients with a high risk of difficult CEB (pDCEB score ≥3) and randomized them into ultrasound and landmark groups to verify the role of ultrasound. RESULT: The rate of difficult CEB was 14.98% overall 289 patients. We found a correlation between unclear palpation of the sacral hiatus (OR 9.688) and cornua (OR 4.725), the number of the sacral hiatus by palpation ≥1 (OR 4.451), and history of difficult CEB (OR 39.282) with a higher possibility of difficult CEB. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the pDCEB model involving the aforementioned factors was 0.889 (95% CI, 0.827–0.952) in the development cohort and 0.862 (95% CI, 0.747–0.977) in the validation cohort. For patients with a pDCEB score ≥3, a preprocedure ultrasound scan could reduce the incidence of difficult CEB (55.56% in the Landmark group vs. 9.38% in the ultrasound group, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This novel pDCEB score, which takes into account palpation of the sacral hiatus/cornua, number of the sacral hiatus by palpation ≥1, and history of difficult CEB, showed a good predictive ability of difficult CEB. The findings suggested that performing an ultrasound scan is essential for patients with a pDCEB score ≥3. Trial registration: No: ChiCTR1800018871, Site URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=31875&htm=4; Principal investigator: Jialian Zhao, Date of registration: 2018.10.14.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9652077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96520772022-11-15 Establishment of Difficult Caudal Epidural Blockade Prediction Model Xie, Guohao Zhao, Jialian Chu, Lihua Song, Shengwen Wang, Ya Lai, Dengming Cheng, Baoli Fang, Xiangming Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a predictive difficult caudal epidural blockade (pDCEB) model when ultrasound was not available and verified the role of ultrasound in difficult caudal epidural blockade (CEB). METHODS: From October 2018 to March 2019, this study consisted of three phases. First, we prospectively enrolled 202 patients scheduled to undergo caudal epidural anesthesia and assessed risk factors by binary logistic regression to develop the predictive scoring system. Second, we enrolled 87 patients to validate it. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of the prediction model. Youden-index was used to determine the cut-off value. Third, we enrolled 68 patients with a high risk of difficult CEB (pDCEB score ≥3) and randomized them into ultrasound and landmark groups to verify the role of ultrasound. RESULT: The rate of difficult CEB was 14.98% overall 289 patients. We found a correlation between unclear palpation of the sacral hiatus (OR 9.688) and cornua (OR 4.725), the number of the sacral hiatus by palpation ≥1 (OR 4.451), and history of difficult CEB (OR 39.282) with a higher possibility of difficult CEB. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the pDCEB model involving the aforementioned factors was 0.889 (95% CI, 0.827–0.952) in the development cohort and 0.862 (95% CI, 0.747–0.977) in the validation cohort. For patients with a pDCEB score ≥3, a preprocedure ultrasound scan could reduce the incidence of difficult CEB (55.56% in the Landmark group vs. 9.38% in the ultrasound group, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This novel pDCEB score, which takes into account palpation of the sacral hiatus/cornua, number of the sacral hiatus by palpation ≥1, and history of difficult CEB, showed a good predictive ability of difficult CEB. The findings suggested that performing an ultrasound scan is essential for patients with a pDCEB score ≥3. Trial registration: No: ChiCTR1800018871, Site URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=31875&htm=4; Principal investigator: Jialian Zhao, Date of registration: 2018.10.14. Hindawi 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9652077/ /pubmed/36387347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2037904 Text en Copyright © 2022 Guohao Xie et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xie, Guohao
Zhao, Jialian
Chu, Lihua
Song, Shengwen
Wang, Ya
Lai, Dengming
Cheng, Baoli
Fang, Xiangming
Establishment of Difficult Caudal Epidural Blockade Prediction Model
title Establishment of Difficult Caudal Epidural Blockade Prediction Model
title_full Establishment of Difficult Caudal Epidural Blockade Prediction Model
title_fullStr Establishment of Difficult Caudal Epidural Blockade Prediction Model
title_full_unstemmed Establishment of Difficult Caudal Epidural Blockade Prediction Model
title_short Establishment of Difficult Caudal Epidural Blockade Prediction Model
title_sort establishment of difficult caudal epidural blockade prediction model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2037904
work_keys_str_mv AT xieguohao establishmentofdifficultcaudalepiduralblockadepredictionmodel
AT zhaojialian establishmentofdifficultcaudalepiduralblockadepredictionmodel
AT chulihua establishmentofdifficultcaudalepiduralblockadepredictionmodel
AT songshengwen establishmentofdifficultcaudalepiduralblockadepredictionmodel
AT wangya establishmentofdifficultcaudalepiduralblockadepredictionmodel
AT laidengming establishmentofdifficultcaudalepiduralblockadepredictionmodel
AT chengbaoli establishmentofdifficultcaudalepiduralblockadepredictionmodel
AT fangxiangming establishmentofdifficultcaudalepiduralblockadepredictionmodel