Cargando…

Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: The potential role and benefits of AI in surgery has yet to be determined. This study is a first step in developing an AI system for minimizing adverse events and improving patient’s safety. We developed an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm and evaluated its performance in recognizi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golany, Tomer, Aides, Amit, Freedman, Daniel, Rabani, Nadav, Liu, Yun, Rivlin, Ehud, Corrado, Greg S., Matias, Yossi, Khoury, Wisam, Kashtan, Hanoch, Reissman, Petachia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5
_version_ 1784828416547094528
author Golany, Tomer
Aides, Amit
Freedman, Daniel
Rabani, Nadav
Liu, Yun
Rivlin, Ehud
Corrado, Greg S.
Matias, Yossi
Khoury, Wisam
Kashtan, Hanoch
Reissman, Petachia
author_facet Golany, Tomer
Aides, Amit
Freedman, Daniel
Rabani, Nadav
Liu, Yun
Rivlin, Ehud
Corrado, Greg S.
Matias, Yossi
Khoury, Wisam
Kashtan, Hanoch
Reissman, Petachia
author_sort Golany, Tomer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The potential role and benefits of AI in surgery has yet to be determined. This study is a first step in developing an AI system for minimizing adverse events and improving patient’s safety. We developed an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm and evaluated its performance in recognizing surgical phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) videos spanning a range of complexities. METHODS: A set of 371 LC videos with various complexity levels and containing adverse events was collected from five hospitals. Two expert surgeons segmented each video into 10 phases including Calot’s triangle dissection and clipping and cutting. For each video, adverse events were also annotated when present (major bleeding; gallbladder perforation; major bile leakage; and incidental finding) and complexity level (on a scale of 1–5) was also recorded. The dataset was then split in an 80:20 ratio (294 and 77 videos), stratified by complexity, hospital, and adverse events to train and test the AI model, respectively. The AI-surgeon agreement was then compared to the agreement between surgeons. RESULTS: The mean accuracy of the AI model for surgical phase recognition was 89% [95% CI 87.1%, 90.6%], comparable to the mean inter-annotator agreement of 90% [95% CI 89.4%, 90.5%]. The model’s accuracy was inversely associated with procedure complexity, decreasing from 92% (complexity level 1) to 88% (complexity level 3) to 81% (complexity level 5). CONCLUSION: The AI model successfully identified surgical phases in both simple and complex LC procedures. Further validation and system training is warranted to evaluate its potential applications such as to increase patient safety during surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9652206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96522062022-11-15 Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy Golany, Tomer Aides, Amit Freedman, Daniel Rabani, Nadav Liu, Yun Rivlin, Ehud Corrado, Greg S. Matias, Yossi Khoury, Wisam Kashtan, Hanoch Reissman, Petachia Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: The potential role and benefits of AI in surgery has yet to be determined. This study is a first step in developing an AI system for minimizing adverse events and improving patient’s safety. We developed an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm and evaluated its performance in recognizing surgical phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) videos spanning a range of complexities. METHODS: A set of 371 LC videos with various complexity levels and containing adverse events was collected from five hospitals. Two expert surgeons segmented each video into 10 phases including Calot’s triangle dissection and clipping and cutting. For each video, adverse events were also annotated when present (major bleeding; gallbladder perforation; major bile leakage; and incidental finding) and complexity level (on a scale of 1–5) was also recorded. The dataset was then split in an 80:20 ratio (294 and 77 videos), stratified by complexity, hospital, and adverse events to train and test the AI model, respectively. The AI-surgeon agreement was then compared to the agreement between surgeons. RESULTS: The mean accuracy of the AI model for surgical phase recognition was 89% [95% CI 87.1%, 90.6%], comparable to the mean inter-annotator agreement of 90% [95% CI 89.4%, 90.5%]. The model’s accuracy was inversely associated with procedure complexity, decreasing from 92% (complexity level 1) to 88% (complexity level 3) to 81% (complexity level 5). CONCLUSION: The AI model successfully identified surgical phases in both simple and complex LC procedures. Further validation and system training is warranted to evaluate its potential applications such as to increase patient safety during surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5. Springer US 2022-08-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9652206/ /pubmed/35941306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Golany, Tomer
Aides, Amit
Freedman, Daniel
Rabani, Nadav
Liu, Yun
Rivlin, Ehud
Corrado, Greg S.
Matias, Yossi
Khoury, Wisam
Kashtan, Hanoch
Reissman, Petachia
Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_short Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_sort artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5
work_keys_str_mv AT golanytomer artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT aidesamit artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT freedmandaniel artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT rabaninadav artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT liuyun artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT rivlinehud artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT corradogregs artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT matiasyossi artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT khourywisam artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT kashtanhanoch artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT reissmanpetachia artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy