Cargando…
Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy
BACKGROUND: The potential role and benefits of AI in surgery has yet to be determined. This study is a first step in developing an AI system for minimizing adverse events and improving patient’s safety. We developed an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm and evaluated its performance in recognizi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5 |
_version_ | 1784828416547094528 |
---|---|
author | Golany, Tomer Aides, Amit Freedman, Daniel Rabani, Nadav Liu, Yun Rivlin, Ehud Corrado, Greg S. Matias, Yossi Khoury, Wisam Kashtan, Hanoch Reissman, Petachia |
author_facet | Golany, Tomer Aides, Amit Freedman, Daniel Rabani, Nadav Liu, Yun Rivlin, Ehud Corrado, Greg S. Matias, Yossi Khoury, Wisam Kashtan, Hanoch Reissman, Petachia |
author_sort | Golany, Tomer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The potential role and benefits of AI in surgery has yet to be determined. This study is a first step in developing an AI system for minimizing adverse events and improving patient’s safety. We developed an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm and evaluated its performance in recognizing surgical phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) videos spanning a range of complexities. METHODS: A set of 371 LC videos with various complexity levels and containing adverse events was collected from five hospitals. Two expert surgeons segmented each video into 10 phases including Calot’s triangle dissection and clipping and cutting. For each video, adverse events were also annotated when present (major bleeding; gallbladder perforation; major bile leakage; and incidental finding) and complexity level (on a scale of 1–5) was also recorded. The dataset was then split in an 80:20 ratio (294 and 77 videos), stratified by complexity, hospital, and adverse events to train and test the AI model, respectively. The AI-surgeon agreement was then compared to the agreement between surgeons. RESULTS: The mean accuracy of the AI model for surgical phase recognition was 89% [95% CI 87.1%, 90.6%], comparable to the mean inter-annotator agreement of 90% [95% CI 89.4%, 90.5%]. The model’s accuracy was inversely associated with procedure complexity, decreasing from 92% (complexity level 1) to 88% (complexity level 3) to 81% (complexity level 5). CONCLUSION: The AI model successfully identified surgical phases in both simple and complex LC procedures. Further validation and system training is warranted to evaluate its potential applications such as to increase patient safety during surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9652206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96522062022-11-15 Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy Golany, Tomer Aides, Amit Freedman, Daniel Rabani, Nadav Liu, Yun Rivlin, Ehud Corrado, Greg S. Matias, Yossi Khoury, Wisam Kashtan, Hanoch Reissman, Petachia Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: The potential role and benefits of AI in surgery has yet to be determined. This study is a first step in developing an AI system for minimizing adverse events and improving patient’s safety. We developed an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm and evaluated its performance in recognizing surgical phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) videos spanning a range of complexities. METHODS: A set of 371 LC videos with various complexity levels and containing adverse events was collected from five hospitals. Two expert surgeons segmented each video into 10 phases including Calot’s triangle dissection and clipping and cutting. For each video, adverse events were also annotated when present (major bleeding; gallbladder perforation; major bile leakage; and incidental finding) and complexity level (on a scale of 1–5) was also recorded. The dataset was then split in an 80:20 ratio (294 and 77 videos), stratified by complexity, hospital, and adverse events to train and test the AI model, respectively. The AI-surgeon agreement was then compared to the agreement between surgeons. RESULTS: The mean accuracy of the AI model for surgical phase recognition was 89% [95% CI 87.1%, 90.6%], comparable to the mean inter-annotator agreement of 90% [95% CI 89.4%, 90.5%]. The model’s accuracy was inversely associated with procedure complexity, decreasing from 92% (complexity level 1) to 88% (complexity level 3) to 81% (complexity level 5). CONCLUSION: The AI model successfully identified surgical phases in both simple and complex LC procedures. Further validation and system training is warranted to evaluate its potential applications such as to increase patient safety during surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5. Springer US 2022-08-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9652206/ /pubmed/35941306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Golany, Tomer Aides, Amit Freedman, Daniel Rabani, Nadav Liu, Yun Rivlin, Ehud Corrado, Greg S. Matias, Yossi Khoury, Wisam Kashtan, Hanoch Reissman, Petachia Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title | Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title_full | Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title_short | Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title_sort | artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT golanytomer artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT aidesamit artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT freedmandaniel artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT rabaninadav artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT liuyun artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT rivlinehud artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT corradogregs artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT matiasyossi artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT khourywisam artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT kashtanhanoch artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT reissmanpetachia artificialintelligenceforphaserecognitionincomplexlaparoscopiccholecystectomy |