Cargando…

Evaluating different combination methods to analyse ultrasound and shear wave elastography images automatically through discriminative convolutional neural network in breast cancer imaging

PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) and Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) imaging are non-invasive methods used for breast lesion characterization. While US and SWE images provide both morphological information, SWE visualizes in addition the elasticity of tissue. In this study a Discriminative Convolutional Neura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann, Rudolf, Reich, Christoph, Skerl, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02737-6
_version_ 1784828426331357184
author Hoffmann, Rudolf
Reich, Christoph
Skerl, Katrin
author_facet Hoffmann, Rudolf
Reich, Christoph
Skerl, Katrin
author_sort Hoffmann, Rudolf
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) and Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) imaging are non-invasive methods used for breast lesion characterization. While US and SWE images provide both morphological information, SWE visualizes in addition the elasticity of tissue. In this study a Discriminative Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) model is applied to US and SWE images and their combination to classify the breast lesions into malignant or benign cases. Furthermore, it is identified whether analysing only the region of the elastogram or including the surrounding B-mode image gives a superior performance. METHODS: The dataset used in this study consists of 746 images obtained from 207 patients comprising 486 malignant and 260 benign breast lesions. From each image the US and SWE image was extracted, once including only the region of the elastogram and once including also the surrounding B-mode image. These four datasets were applied individually to a DCNN to determine their predictive capability. Each the best US and SWE dataset were used to examine different combination methods with DCNN. The results were compared to the manual assessment by an expert radiologist. RESULTS: The combination of US and SWE images with the surrounding B-mode image using two ensembled DCNN models achieved best results with an accuracy of 93.53 %, sensitivity of 94.42 %, specificity of 90.75 % and area under the curve (AUC) of 96.55 %. CONCLUSION: This study showed that using the whole US and SWE images through DCNN was superior to methods, in which only the region of elastogram was used. Combining breast cancer US and SWE images with two ensembled DCNN models in parallel improved the results. The accuracy, sensitivity and AUC of the best combination method were significantly superior to the results of using a single dataset through DCNN and to the results of the expert radiologist.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9652247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96522472022-11-15 Evaluating different combination methods to analyse ultrasound and shear wave elastography images automatically through discriminative convolutional neural network in breast cancer imaging Hoffmann, Rudolf Reich, Christoph Skerl, Katrin Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) and Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) imaging are non-invasive methods used for breast lesion characterization. While US and SWE images provide both morphological information, SWE visualizes in addition the elasticity of tissue. In this study a Discriminative Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) model is applied to US and SWE images and their combination to classify the breast lesions into malignant or benign cases. Furthermore, it is identified whether analysing only the region of the elastogram or including the surrounding B-mode image gives a superior performance. METHODS: The dataset used in this study consists of 746 images obtained from 207 patients comprising 486 malignant and 260 benign breast lesions. From each image the US and SWE image was extracted, once including only the region of the elastogram and once including also the surrounding B-mode image. These four datasets were applied individually to a DCNN to determine their predictive capability. Each the best US and SWE dataset were used to examine different combination methods with DCNN. The results were compared to the manual assessment by an expert radiologist. RESULTS: The combination of US and SWE images with the surrounding B-mode image using two ensembled DCNN models achieved best results with an accuracy of 93.53 %, sensitivity of 94.42 %, specificity of 90.75 % and area under the curve (AUC) of 96.55 %. CONCLUSION: This study showed that using the whole US and SWE images through DCNN was superior to methods, in which only the region of elastogram was used. Combining breast cancer US and SWE images with two ensembled DCNN models in parallel improved the results. The accuracy, sensitivity and AUC of the best combination method were significantly superior to the results of using a single dataset through DCNN and to the results of the expert radiologist. Springer International Publishing 2022-08-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9652247/ /pubmed/36018397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02737-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Hoffmann, Rudolf
Reich, Christoph
Skerl, Katrin
Evaluating different combination methods to analyse ultrasound and shear wave elastography images automatically through discriminative convolutional neural network in breast cancer imaging
title Evaluating different combination methods to analyse ultrasound and shear wave elastography images automatically through discriminative convolutional neural network in breast cancer imaging
title_full Evaluating different combination methods to analyse ultrasound and shear wave elastography images automatically through discriminative convolutional neural network in breast cancer imaging
title_fullStr Evaluating different combination methods to analyse ultrasound and shear wave elastography images automatically through discriminative convolutional neural network in breast cancer imaging
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating different combination methods to analyse ultrasound and shear wave elastography images automatically through discriminative convolutional neural network in breast cancer imaging
title_short Evaluating different combination methods to analyse ultrasound and shear wave elastography images automatically through discriminative convolutional neural network in breast cancer imaging
title_sort evaluating different combination methods to analyse ultrasound and shear wave elastography images automatically through discriminative convolutional neural network in breast cancer imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02737-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmannrudolf evaluatingdifferentcombinationmethodstoanalyseultrasoundandshearwaveelastographyimagesautomaticallythroughdiscriminativeconvolutionalneuralnetworkinbreastcancerimaging
AT reichchristoph evaluatingdifferentcombinationmethodstoanalyseultrasoundandshearwaveelastographyimagesautomaticallythroughdiscriminativeconvolutionalneuralnetworkinbreastcancerimaging
AT skerlkatrin evaluatingdifferentcombinationmethodstoanalyseultrasoundandshearwaveelastographyimagesautomaticallythroughdiscriminativeconvolutionalneuralnetworkinbreastcancerimaging