Cargando…

The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Telework from home (TWFH) has become routine for many, yet research on how this may affect the psychosocial work environment is sparse. To understand the effects that TWFH may have on the psychosocial work environment, this systematic literature review identified, evaluated, and summarize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vleeshouwers, Jolien, Fløvik, Lise, Christensen, Jan Olav, Johannessen, Håkon A., Bakke Finne, Live, Mohr, Benedicte, Jørgensen, Ingrid Løken, Lunde, Lars-Kristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35829741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4
_version_ 1784828431749349376
author Vleeshouwers, Jolien
Fløvik, Lise
Christensen, Jan Olav
Johannessen, Håkon A.
Bakke Finne, Live
Mohr, Benedicte
Jørgensen, Ingrid Løken
Lunde, Lars-Kristian
author_facet Vleeshouwers, Jolien
Fløvik, Lise
Christensen, Jan Olav
Johannessen, Håkon A.
Bakke Finne, Live
Mohr, Benedicte
Jørgensen, Ingrid Løken
Lunde, Lars-Kristian
author_sort Vleeshouwers, Jolien
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Telework from home (TWFH) has become routine for many, yet research on how this may affect the psychosocial work environment is sparse. To understand the effects that TWFH may have on the psychosocial work environment, this systematic literature review identified, evaluated, and summarized findings on the association of TWFH with factors of the psychosocial work environment. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Amed, PsycINFO, and PubMed. The topic of the study reflected TWFH, and subjects should be office workers employed at a company. Outcomes should reflect psychosocial work environment factors. Inclusion criteria stated that studies should be primary, quantitative, and published in a peer-reviewed journal. English language publications dating from January 2010 to February 2021 were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) and quality of overall evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Searches resulted in 3354 publications, and after screening rounds 43 peer-reviewed original studies satisfying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Fourteen individual psychosocial work environment outcome categories were studied. Limited overall evidence to support effects of TWFH on the included work environment outcomes, with evidence being rated either of low or very low quality. Flexibility and autonomy are discussed as potential mediating variables in the relationship between TWFH and the psychosocial work environment. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of high-quality research investigating effects of TWFH on the psychosocial work environment. To suggest TWFH guidelines or recommendations, there is a need for research with high-quality longitudinal designs, precise measures of time use and location of work, and validated measures of factors known to be of importance. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021233796. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9652268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96522682022-11-15 The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review Vleeshouwers, Jolien Fløvik, Lise Christensen, Jan Olav Johannessen, Håkon A. Bakke Finne, Live Mohr, Benedicte Jørgensen, Ingrid Løken Lunde, Lars-Kristian Int Arch Occup Environ Health Review Article OBJECTIVE: Telework from home (TWFH) has become routine for many, yet research on how this may affect the psychosocial work environment is sparse. To understand the effects that TWFH may have on the psychosocial work environment, this systematic literature review identified, evaluated, and summarized findings on the association of TWFH with factors of the psychosocial work environment. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Amed, PsycINFO, and PubMed. The topic of the study reflected TWFH, and subjects should be office workers employed at a company. Outcomes should reflect psychosocial work environment factors. Inclusion criteria stated that studies should be primary, quantitative, and published in a peer-reviewed journal. English language publications dating from January 2010 to February 2021 were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) and quality of overall evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Searches resulted in 3354 publications, and after screening rounds 43 peer-reviewed original studies satisfying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Fourteen individual psychosocial work environment outcome categories were studied. Limited overall evidence to support effects of TWFH on the included work environment outcomes, with evidence being rated either of low or very low quality. Flexibility and autonomy are discussed as potential mediating variables in the relationship between TWFH and the psychosocial work environment. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of high-quality research investigating effects of TWFH on the psychosocial work environment. To suggest TWFH guidelines or recommendations, there is a need for research with high-quality longitudinal designs, precise measures of time use and location of work, and validated measures of factors known to be of importance. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021233796. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9652268/ /pubmed/35829741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Vleeshouwers, Jolien
Fløvik, Lise
Christensen, Jan Olav
Johannessen, Håkon A.
Bakke Finne, Live
Mohr, Benedicte
Jørgensen, Ingrid Løken
Lunde, Lars-Kristian
The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review
title The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review
title_full The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review
title_fullStr The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review
title_short The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review
title_sort relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35829741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vleeshouwersjolien therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT fløviklise therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT christensenjanolav therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT johannessenhakona therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT bakkefinnelive therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT mohrbenedicte therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT jørgenseningridløken therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT lundelarskristian therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT vleeshouwersjolien relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT fløviklise relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT christensenjanolav relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT johannessenhakona relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT bakkefinnelive relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT mohrbenedicte relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT jørgenseningridløken relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview
AT lundelarskristian relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview