Cargando…
The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: Telework from home (TWFH) has become routine for many, yet research on how this may affect the psychosocial work environment is sparse. To understand the effects that TWFH may have on the psychosocial work environment, this systematic literature review identified, evaluated, and summarize...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35829741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4 |
_version_ | 1784828431749349376 |
---|---|
author | Vleeshouwers, Jolien Fløvik, Lise Christensen, Jan Olav Johannessen, Håkon A. Bakke Finne, Live Mohr, Benedicte Jørgensen, Ingrid Løken Lunde, Lars-Kristian |
author_facet | Vleeshouwers, Jolien Fløvik, Lise Christensen, Jan Olav Johannessen, Håkon A. Bakke Finne, Live Mohr, Benedicte Jørgensen, Ingrid Løken Lunde, Lars-Kristian |
author_sort | Vleeshouwers, Jolien |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Telework from home (TWFH) has become routine for many, yet research on how this may affect the psychosocial work environment is sparse. To understand the effects that TWFH may have on the psychosocial work environment, this systematic literature review identified, evaluated, and summarized findings on the association of TWFH with factors of the psychosocial work environment. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Amed, PsycINFO, and PubMed. The topic of the study reflected TWFH, and subjects should be office workers employed at a company. Outcomes should reflect psychosocial work environment factors. Inclusion criteria stated that studies should be primary, quantitative, and published in a peer-reviewed journal. English language publications dating from January 2010 to February 2021 were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) and quality of overall evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Searches resulted in 3354 publications, and after screening rounds 43 peer-reviewed original studies satisfying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Fourteen individual psychosocial work environment outcome categories were studied. Limited overall evidence to support effects of TWFH on the included work environment outcomes, with evidence being rated either of low or very low quality. Flexibility and autonomy are discussed as potential mediating variables in the relationship between TWFH and the psychosocial work environment. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of high-quality research investigating effects of TWFH on the psychosocial work environment. To suggest TWFH guidelines or recommendations, there is a need for research with high-quality longitudinal designs, precise measures of time use and location of work, and validated measures of factors known to be of importance. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021233796. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9652268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96522682022-11-15 The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review Vleeshouwers, Jolien Fløvik, Lise Christensen, Jan Olav Johannessen, Håkon A. Bakke Finne, Live Mohr, Benedicte Jørgensen, Ingrid Løken Lunde, Lars-Kristian Int Arch Occup Environ Health Review Article OBJECTIVE: Telework from home (TWFH) has become routine for many, yet research on how this may affect the psychosocial work environment is sparse. To understand the effects that TWFH may have on the psychosocial work environment, this systematic literature review identified, evaluated, and summarized findings on the association of TWFH with factors of the psychosocial work environment. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Amed, PsycINFO, and PubMed. The topic of the study reflected TWFH, and subjects should be office workers employed at a company. Outcomes should reflect psychosocial work environment factors. Inclusion criteria stated that studies should be primary, quantitative, and published in a peer-reviewed journal. English language publications dating from January 2010 to February 2021 were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) and quality of overall evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Searches resulted in 3354 publications, and after screening rounds 43 peer-reviewed original studies satisfying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Fourteen individual psychosocial work environment outcome categories were studied. Limited overall evidence to support effects of TWFH on the included work environment outcomes, with evidence being rated either of low or very low quality. Flexibility and autonomy are discussed as potential mediating variables in the relationship between TWFH and the psychosocial work environment. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of high-quality research investigating effects of TWFH on the psychosocial work environment. To suggest TWFH guidelines or recommendations, there is a need for research with high-quality longitudinal designs, precise measures of time use and location of work, and validated measures of factors known to be of importance. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021233796. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9652268/ /pubmed/35829741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Vleeshouwers, Jolien Fløvik, Lise Christensen, Jan Olav Johannessen, Håkon A. Bakke Finne, Live Mohr, Benedicte Jørgensen, Ingrid Løken Lunde, Lars-Kristian The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review |
title | The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review |
title_full | The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review |
title_short | The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review |
title_sort | relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35829741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vleeshouwersjolien therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT fløviklise therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT christensenjanolav therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT johannessenhakona therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT bakkefinnelive therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT mohrbenedicte therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT jørgenseningridløken therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT lundelarskristian therelationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT vleeshouwersjolien relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT fløviklise relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT christensenjanolav relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT johannessenhakona relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT bakkefinnelive relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT mohrbenedicte relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT jørgenseningridløken relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview AT lundelarskristian relationshipbetweenteleworkfromhomeandthepsychosocialworkenvironmentasystematicreview |