Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib for preventing tumor recurrence after liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib is one of the first-line treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, data are lacking on lenvatinib in the postoperative setting. METHODS: This retrospective analysis enrolled 242 patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation (LTx). Eligible pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, De-Zhen, Cheng, Jian-Wen, Yan, Jia-Yan, Huang, Ao, Wang, Yu-Peng, Zhang, Shi-Yu, Cao, Ya, Huang, Xiao-Wu, Fan, Jia, Zhou, Jian, Yang, Xin-Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388794
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-1353
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib is one of the first-line treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, data are lacking on lenvatinib in the postoperative setting. METHODS: This retrospective analysis enrolled 242 patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation (LTx). Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups according to their use of adjuvant lenvatinib following LTx (lenvatinib, n=42; control, n=200). The primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS), time to recurrence (TTR), and safety. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to calculate the OS, while a competing risk model was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of recurrence. RESULTS: The lenvatinib group showed more advanced tumors and a higher proportion of HCC beyond the Milan criteria (P<0.001) than the control group. There were no significant differences in both the OS and TTR between the 2 groups. After focusing on the patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria, baseline characteristics were similar in the lenvatinib group (n=38) and the control group (n=102). Competing risk analysis showed lenvatinib significantly prolonged TTR after LTx versus the control group [sub-hazard ratio (sHR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17 to 0.93; P=0.031]. In the multivariate competing risk model, adjuvant lenvatinib was an independent protective factor for tumor recurrence after LTx in patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria (sHR, 0.33; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.83; P=0.018). The rate of early recurrence within t2 years after LTx was also significantly decreased in the lenvatinib group (15.8% vs. 33.3%, P=0.041). However, the lenvatinib group exhibited comparable OS with the control group in patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 40 (95.2%) and 13 (31%) patients who received adjuvant lenvatinib, respectively. No treatment-related death was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative lenvatinib administration may provide clinical benefits and is well tolerated in patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria who undergo LTx.