Cargando…
Auditory rhythmical cueing to improve gait in community-dwelling stroke survivors (ACTIVATE): a pilot randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Gait impairment limiting mobility and restricting activities is common after stroke. Auditory rhythmical cueing (ARC) uses a metronome beat delivered during exercise to train stepping and early work reports gait improvements. This study aimed to establish the feasibility of a full scale...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36371213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01193-y |
_version_ | 1784828507295055872 |
---|---|
author | Shaw, Lisa McCue, Patricia Brown, Philip Buckley, Christopher Del Din, Silvia Francis, Richard Hunter, Heather Lambert, Allen Lord, Sue Price, Christopher I. M. Rodgers, Helen Rochester, Lynn Moore, Sarah A. |
author_facet | Shaw, Lisa McCue, Patricia Brown, Philip Buckley, Christopher Del Din, Silvia Francis, Richard Hunter, Heather Lambert, Allen Lord, Sue Price, Christopher I. M. Rodgers, Helen Rochester, Lynn Moore, Sarah A. |
author_sort | Shaw, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gait impairment limiting mobility and restricting activities is common after stroke. Auditory rhythmical cueing (ARC) uses a metronome beat delivered during exercise to train stepping and early work reports gait improvements. This study aimed to establish the feasibility of a full scale multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate an ARC gait and balance training programme for use by stroke survivors in the home and outdoors. METHODS: A parallel-group observer-blind pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted. Adults within 2 years of stroke with a gait-related mobility impairment were recruited from four NHS stroke services and randomised to an ARC gait and balance training programme (intervention) or the training programme without ARC (control). Both programmes consisted of 3x30 min sessions per week for 6 weeks undertaken at home/nearby outdoor community. One session per week was supervised and the remainder self-managed. Gait and balance performance assessments were undertaken at baseline, 6 and 10 weeks. Key trial outcomes included recruitment and retention rates, programme adherence, assessment data completeness and safety. RESULTS: Between November 2018 and February 2020, 59 participants were randomised (intervention n=30, control n=29), mean recruitment rate 4/month. At baseline, 6 weeks and 10 weeks, research assessments were conducted for 59/59 (100%), 47/59 (80%) and 42/59 (71%) participants, respectively. Missing assessments were largely due to discontinuation of data collection from mid-March 2020 because of the UK COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The proportion of participants with complete data for each individual performance assessment ranged from 100% at baseline to 68% at 10 weeks. In the intervention group, 433/540 (80%) total programme exercise sessions were undertaken, in the control group, 390/522 (75%). Falls were reported by five participants in the intervention group, six in the control group. Three serious adverse events occurred, all unrelated to the study. CONCLUSION: We believe that a definitive multicentre RCT to evaluate the ARC gait and balance training programme is feasible. Recruitment, programme adherence and safety were all acceptable. Although we consider that the retention rate and assessment data completeness were not sufficient for a future trial, this was largely due to the UK COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN10874601, Registered on 05/03/2018, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-01193-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9652598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96525982022-11-14 Auditory rhythmical cueing to improve gait in community-dwelling stroke survivors (ACTIVATE): a pilot randomised controlled trial Shaw, Lisa McCue, Patricia Brown, Philip Buckley, Christopher Del Din, Silvia Francis, Richard Hunter, Heather Lambert, Allen Lord, Sue Price, Christopher I. M. Rodgers, Helen Rochester, Lynn Moore, Sarah A. Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Gait impairment limiting mobility and restricting activities is common after stroke. Auditory rhythmical cueing (ARC) uses a metronome beat delivered during exercise to train stepping and early work reports gait improvements. This study aimed to establish the feasibility of a full scale multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate an ARC gait and balance training programme for use by stroke survivors in the home and outdoors. METHODS: A parallel-group observer-blind pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted. Adults within 2 years of stroke with a gait-related mobility impairment were recruited from four NHS stroke services and randomised to an ARC gait and balance training programme (intervention) or the training programme without ARC (control). Both programmes consisted of 3x30 min sessions per week for 6 weeks undertaken at home/nearby outdoor community. One session per week was supervised and the remainder self-managed. Gait and balance performance assessments were undertaken at baseline, 6 and 10 weeks. Key trial outcomes included recruitment and retention rates, programme adherence, assessment data completeness and safety. RESULTS: Between November 2018 and February 2020, 59 participants were randomised (intervention n=30, control n=29), mean recruitment rate 4/month. At baseline, 6 weeks and 10 weeks, research assessments were conducted for 59/59 (100%), 47/59 (80%) and 42/59 (71%) participants, respectively. Missing assessments were largely due to discontinuation of data collection from mid-March 2020 because of the UK COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The proportion of participants with complete data for each individual performance assessment ranged from 100% at baseline to 68% at 10 weeks. In the intervention group, 433/540 (80%) total programme exercise sessions were undertaken, in the control group, 390/522 (75%). Falls were reported by five participants in the intervention group, six in the control group. Three serious adverse events occurred, all unrelated to the study. CONCLUSION: We believe that a definitive multicentre RCT to evaluate the ARC gait and balance training programme is feasible. Recruitment, programme adherence and safety were all acceptable. Although we consider that the retention rate and assessment data completeness were not sufficient for a future trial, this was largely due to the UK COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN10874601, Registered on 05/03/2018, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-01193-y. BioMed Central 2022-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9652598/ /pubmed/36371213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01193-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Shaw, Lisa McCue, Patricia Brown, Philip Buckley, Christopher Del Din, Silvia Francis, Richard Hunter, Heather Lambert, Allen Lord, Sue Price, Christopher I. M. Rodgers, Helen Rochester, Lynn Moore, Sarah A. Auditory rhythmical cueing to improve gait in community-dwelling stroke survivors (ACTIVATE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title | Auditory rhythmical cueing to improve gait in community-dwelling stroke survivors (ACTIVATE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Auditory rhythmical cueing to improve gait in community-dwelling stroke survivors (ACTIVATE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Auditory rhythmical cueing to improve gait in community-dwelling stroke survivors (ACTIVATE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Auditory rhythmical cueing to improve gait in community-dwelling stroke survivors (ACTIVATE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Auditory rhythmical cueing to improve gait in community-dwelling stroke survivors (ACTIVATE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | auditory rhythmical cueing to improve gait in community-dwelling stroke survivors (activate): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36371213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01193-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shawlisa auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mccuepatricia auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brownphilip auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT buckleychristopher auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT deldinsilvia auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT francisrichard auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hunterheather auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lambertallen auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lordsue auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pricechristopherim auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rodgershelen auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rochesterlynn auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mooresaraha auditoryrhythmicalcueingtoimprovegaitincommunitydwellingstrokesurvivorsactivateapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial |