Cargando…
Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters
Epigenetic modifications offer compelling evidence of the environmental etiology of complex diseases. Social and biographical conditions, as well as material exposures, all modulate our biology with consequences for risk predispositions and health conditions. Elucidating these complex biosocial loop...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36369214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01366-9 |
_version_ | 1784828577670234112 |
---|---|
author | Chiapperino, Luca Paneni, Francesco |
author_facet | Chiapperino, Luca Paneni, Francesco |
author_sort | Chiapperino, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Epigenetic modifications offer compelling evidence of the environmental etiology of complex diseases. Social and biographical conditions, as well as material exposures, all modulate our biology with consequences for risk predispositions and health conditions. Elucidating these complex biosocial loops is one of the main challenges animating epigenetics. Yet, research on the development of epigenetic biomarkers often pulls in a direction that departs from a view of biological determinants of health embedded in their social and material environment. Taking the example of the epigenetics of cardiovascular diseases, this paper illustrates how common understandings of epigenetic biomarkers strongly lean toward considering them as mere targets for molecular intervention, rather than as correlates of a complex biological and social patterning of disease. This reductionism about biosocial dynamics of disease, we argue, hampers the pursuit of the goals epigenetics has given itself (in cardiology and beyond). If epigenetic mechanisms point to the deep socio-environmental embeddedness of our health, we conclude, future designs and methods of this research may require an improved methodological consideration of a biosocial perspective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9652908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96529082022-11-15 Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters Chiapperino, Luca Paneni, Francesco Clin Epigenetics Correspondence Epigenetic modifications offer compelling evidence of the environmental etiology of complex diseases. Social and biographical conditions, as well as material exposures, all modulate our biology with consequences for risk predispositions and health conditions. Elucidating these complex biosocial loops is one of the main challenges animating epigenetics. Yet, research on the development of epigenetic biomarkers often pulls in a direction that departs from a view of biological determinants of health embedded in their social and material environment. Taking the example of the epigenetics of cardiovascular diseases, this paper illustrates how common understandings of epigenetic biomarkers strongly lean toward considering them as mere targets for molecular intervention, rather than as correlates of a complex biological and social patterning of disease. This reductionism about biosocial dynamics of disease, we argue, hampers the pursuit of the goals epigenetics has given itself (in cardiology and beyond). If epigenetic mechanisms point to the deep socio-environmental embeddedness of our health, we conclude, future designs and methods of this research may require an improved methodological consideration of a biosocial perspective. BioMed Central 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9652908/ /pubmed/36369214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01366-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Chiapperino, Luca Paneni, Francesco Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters |
title | Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters |
title_full | Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters |
title_fullStr | Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters |
title_full_unstemmed | Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters |
title_short | Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters |
title_sort | why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36369214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01366-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiapperinoluca whyepigeneticsisnotabiosocialscienceandwhythatmatters AT panenifrancesco whyepigeneticsisnotabiosocialscienceandwhythatmatters |