Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of (18)F-FACBC PET/MRI in Brain Metastases

The study aims to evaluate whether combined (18)F-FACBC PET/MRI could provide additional diagnostic information compared with MRI alone in brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with newly diagnosed or suspected recurrence of brain metastases received dynamic (18)F-FACBC PET/MRI....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Øen, Silje Kjærnes, Johannessen, Knut, Pedersen, Lars Kjelsberg, Berntsen, Erik Magnus, Totland, Jon Andre, Johansen, Håkon, Bogsrud, Trond Velde, Solheim, Tora S., Karlberg, Anna, Eikenes, Live
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9653108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36241129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000004435
Descripción
Sumario:The study aims to evaluate whether combined (18)F-FACBC PET/MRI could provide additional diagnostic information compared with MRI alone in brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with newly diagnosed or suspected recurrence of brain metastases received dynamic (18)F-FACBC PET/MRI. Lesion detection was evaluated on PET and MRI scans in 2 groups depending on prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS group) or not (no-SRS group). SUVs, time-activity curves, and volumetric analyses of the lesions were performed. RESULTS: In the no-SRS group, 29/29 brain lesions were defined as “MRI positive.” With PET, 19/29 lesions were detected and had high tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) (D(max MR), ≥7 mm; SUV(max), 1.2–8.4; TBR, 3.9–25.9), whereas 10/29 lesions were undetected (D(max MR), ≤8 mm; SUV(max), 0.3–1.2; TBR, 1.0–2.7). In the SRS group, 4/6 lesions were defined as “MRI positive,” whereas 2/6 lesions were defined as “MRI negative” indicative of radiation necrosis. All 6 lesions were detected with PET (D(max MR), ≥15 mm; SUV(max), 1.4–4.2; TBR, 3.6–12.6). PET volumes correlated and were comparable in size with contrast-enhanced MRI volumes but were only partially congruent (mean DSC, 0.66). All time-activity curves had an early peak, followed by a plateau or a decreasing slope. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FACBC PET demonstrated uptake in brain metastases from cancer of different origins (lung, gastrointestinal tract, breast, thyroid, and malignant melanoma). However, (18)F-FACBC PET/MRI did not improve detection of brain metastases compared with MRI but might detect tumor tissue beyond contrast enhancement on MRI. (18)F-FACBC PET should be further evaluated in recurrent brain metastases.