Cargando…
Application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing
In this study, the capabilities of classical and novel integrated machine learning models were investigated to predict sediment discharge (Q(s)) in free-flow flushing. Developed models include Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Syste...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9653452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36371476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23781-x |
_version_ | 1784828687552610304 |
---|---|
author | Javadi, Fahime Qaderi, Kourosh Ahmadi, Mohammad Mehdi Rahimpour, Majid Madadi, Mohamad Reza Mahdavi-Meymand, Amin |
author_facet | Javadi, Fahime Qaderi, Kourosh Ahmadi, Mohammad Mehdi Rahimpour, Majid Madadi, Mohamad Reza Mahdavi-Meymand, Amin |
author_sort | Javadi, Fahime |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, the capabilities of classical and novel integrated machine learning models were investigated to predict sediment discharge (Q(s)) in free-flow flushing. Developed models include Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH), and four hybrid forms of GMDH and Support Vector Regression (SVR) in combination with Henry Gas Solubility Optimization (HGSO) and Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) algorithms. The number of 160 datasets that were applied to assess these models was extracted from the Janssen (PhD’s Thesis, Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of California, 1999) experimental study. Input parameters to predict Q(s) included the water level in the reservoir (h(w)), bed level in the flushing channel (h(b)), outflow (Q(out)), inflow (Q(in)), and elapsed time of flushing (T). The performance of all models was evaluated by four statistical indices of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), correlation coefficient (R(2)), and Mean absolute relative error (MARE). Evaluation of results demonstrated that the HGSO and EO algorithms could enhance the accuracy of the GMDH model (up to 26% and 22% in terms of RMSE), respectively. According to statistical criteria, the SVR-EO and SVR-HGSO provided the highest accuracy in both training (R(2) = 0.98) and validation phases (R(2) = 0.96). Moreover, among the developed models, the GMDH-HGSO algorithm provided excellent fitness to the observed data (R(2) = 0.96, RMSE = 22.37, MAE = 15.65, and MARE = 0.26). The results indicated the high efficiency of the HGSO and EO algorithms in improving the accuracy of the GMDH and SVR models. However, among the developed models, the GMDH-HGSO is the most accurate model and is recommended for sediment transport modelling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9653452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96534522022-11-15 Application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing Javadi, Fahime Qaderi, Kourosh Ahmadi, Mohammad Mehdi Rahimpour, Majid Madadi, Mohamad Reza Mahdavi-Meymand, Amin Sci Rep Article In this study, the capabilities of classical and novel integrated machine learning models were investigated to predict sediment discharge (Q(s)) in free-flow flushing. Developed models include Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH), and four hybrid forms of GMDH and Support Vector Regression (SVR) in combination with Henry Gas Solubility Optimization (HGSO) and Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) algorithms. The number of 160 datasets that were applied to assess these models was extracted from the Janssen (PhD’s Thesis, Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of California, 1999) experimental study. Input parameters to predict Q(s) included the water level in the reservoir (h(w)), bed level in the flushing channel (h(b)), outflow (Q(out)), inflow (Q(in)), and elapsed time of flushing (T). The performance of all models was evaluated by four statistical indices of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), correlation coefficient (R(2)), and Mean absolute relative error (MARE). Evaluation of results demonstrated that the HGSO and EO algorithms could enhance the accuracy of the GMDH model (up to 26% and 22% in terms of RMSE), respectively. According to statistical criteria, the SVR-EO and SVR-HGSO provided the highest accuracy in both training (R(2) = 0.98) and validation phases (R(2) = 0.96). Moreover, among the developed models, the GMDH-HGSO algorithm provided excellent fitness to the observed data (R(2) = 0.96, RMSE = 22.37, MAE = 15.65, and MARE = 0.26). The results indicated the high efficiency of the HGSO and EO algorithms in improving the accuracy of the GMDH and SVR models. However, among the developed models, the GMDH-HGSO is the most accurate model and is recommended for sediment transport modelling. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9653452/ /pubmed/36371476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23781-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Javadi, Fahime Qaderi, Kourosh Ahmadi, Mohammad Mehdi Rahimpour, Majid Madadi, Mohamad Reza Mahdavi-Meymand, Amin Application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing |
title | Application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing |
title_full | Application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing |
title_fullStr | Application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing |
title_short | Application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing |
title_sort | application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9653452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36371476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23781-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT javadifahime applicationofclassicalandnovelintegratedmachinelearningmodelstopredictsedimentdischargeduringfreeflowflushing AT qaderikourosh applicationofclassicalandnovelintegratedmachinelearningmodelstopredictsedimentdischargeduringfreeflowflushing AT ahmadimohammadmehdi applicationofclassicalandnovelintegratedmachinelearningmodelstopredictsedimentdischargeduringfreeflowflushing AT rahimpourmajid applicationofclassicalandnovelintegratedmachinelearningmodelstopredictsedimentdischargeduringfreeflowflushing AT madadimohamadreza applicationofclassicalandnovelintegratedmachinelearningmodelstopredictsedimentdischargeduringfreeflowflushing AT mahdavimeymandamin applicationofclassicalandnovelintegratedmachinelearningmodelstopredictsedimentdischargeduringfreeflowflushing |