Cargando…

Beyond “Doing Better”: Ordinal Rating Scales to Monitor Behavioural Indicators of Well-Being in Cats

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Animal shelters need to do their best to ensure that the cats in their care have a good quality of life. There are many strategies they can use to meet this goal. However, it is important to evaluate if these strategies are successful to ensure continual improvement of care. This eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ellis, Jacklyn J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9653587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12212897
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: Animal shelters need to do their best to ensure that the cats in their care have a good quality of life. There are many strategies they can use to meet this goal. However, it is important to evaluate if these strategies are successful to ensure continual improvement of care. This evaluation can be challenging, as tools for this purpose are limited. This paper presents a method of evaluating four different expressions of cat welfare on a 0–5 scale and shows that results are very similar between raters (after a training program), ensuring that the data are reliable. These rating scales may prove useful for other shelters or any environment where objective evaluation of cat welfare is required. ABSTRACT: Safeguarding the well-being of cats is essential to the mission of any responsible animal shelter. Environmental enrichment and behaviour modification are often key to this goal. Measuring response to these interventions is essential to ensure strategies are successful. There are often many staff and volunteers involved in these efforts, and a lack of standardised language can make monitoring progress difficult. Ordinal rating scales of key behaviours can be a useful way to summarise observations and ensure that common language is used. However, it is crucial that these scales have good interobserver agreement and reliability, so operational definitions and training systems are important. This paper presents a method for evaluating four different expressions of cat welfare on a 0–5 scale: modified Fear, Anxiety, and Stress score; Response to Petting score; Participation in Play score; and Food Intake Summary score. All scales showed almost perfect average interobserver agreement (linear weighted κ) and excellent average interobserver reliability (interclass correlation coefficient). These scales may prove useful to other shelters, or any other environment where evaluating response to interventions is important to the welfare of cats, such as research facilities or home environments. The exceptional interobserver agreement and reliability of this study compared with some others highlights the importance of standardised training programs.