Cargando…
Comparison of L-Shaped and U-Shaped Beams in Bidirectional Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting
The traditional single degree of freedom linear piezoelectric vibration energy harvester (PVEH), such as the cantilever type, mainly works and resonates in a single direction and at a single frequency. To adapt broadband and bidirectional ambient vibration, this paper designs and compares two PVEHs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36364494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12213718 |
_version_ | 1784828846444380160 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Weile Wang, Lu Wang, Xinquan Zhao, Libo Fang, Xudong Maeda, Ryutaro |
author_facet | Jiang, Weile Wang, Lu Wang, Xinquan Zhao, Libo Fang, Xudong Maeda, Ryutaro |
author_sort | Jiang, Weile |
collection | PubMed |
description | The traditional single degree of freedom linear piezoelectric vibration energy harvester (PVEH), such as the cantilever type, mainly works and resonates in a single direction and at a single frequency. To adapt broadband and bidirectional ambient vibration, this paper designs and compares two PVEHs of L-shaped beam and U-shaped beam through COMSOL simulation and prototype test. FEA modeling is introduced for accurate structure design with modal analysis, voltage frequency response analysis, and proof mass analysis with multiphysics electromechanical coupling simulation. Two PVEH prototypes with different gravity angles and clamping angles are tested at 0.1 g acceleration to find the optimal angle for maximum output power. The best clamping angle of L-PVEH is 135° with RMS power of 0.3 mW at 7.9 Hz, and that of U-PVEH is 45° with RMS power of 0.4 mW at 5.0 Hz. The proposed U-PVEH shows more advantages in low broadband and bidirectional vibration energy harvesting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9654103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96541032022-11-15 Comparison of L-Shaped and U-Shaped Beams in Bidirectional Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting Jiang, Weile Wang, Lu Wang, Xinquan Zhao, Libo Fang, Xudong Maeda, Ryutaro Nanomaterials (Basel) Article The traditional single degree of freedom linear piezoelectric vibration energy harvester (PVEH), such as the cantilever type, mainly works and resonates in a single direction and at a single frequency. To adapt broadband and bidirectional ambient vibration, this paper designs and compares two PVEHs of L-shaped beam and U-shaped beam through COMSOL simulation and prototype test. FEA modeling is introduced for accurate structure design with modal analysis, voltage frequency response analysis, and proof mass analysis with multiphysics electromechanical coupling simulation. Two PVEH prototypes with different gravity angles and clamping angles are tested at 0.1 g acceleration to find the optimal angle for maximum output power. The best clamping angle of L-PVEH is 135° with RMS power of 0.3 mW at 7.9 Hz, and that of U-PVEH is 45° with RMS power of 0.4 mW at 5.0 Hz. The proposed U-PVEH shows more advantages in low broadband and bidirectional vibration energy harvesting. MDPI 2022-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9654103/ /pubmed/36364494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12213718 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jiang, Weile Wang, Lu Wang, Xinquan Zhao, Libo Fang, Xudong Maeda, Ryutaro Comparison of L-Shaped and U-Shaped Beams in Bidirectional Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting |
title | Comparison of L-Shaped and U-Shaped Beams in Bidirectional Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting |
title_full | Comparison of L-Shaped and U-Shaped Beams in Bidirectional Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting |
title_fullStr | Comparison of L-Shaped and U-Shaped Beams in Bidirectional Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of L-Shaped and U-Shaped Beams in Bidirectional Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting |
title_short | Comparison of L-Shaped and U-Shaped Beams in Bidirectional Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting |
title_sort | comparison of l-shaped and u-shaped beams in bidirectional piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36364494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12213718 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangweile comparisonoflshapedandushapedbeamsinbidirectionalpiezoelectricvibrationenergyharvesting AT wanglu comparisonoflshapedandushapedbeamsinbidirectionalpiezoelectricvibrationenergyharvesting AT wangxinquan comparisonoflshapedandushapedbeamsinbidirectionalpiezoelectricvibrationenergyharvesting AT zhaolibo comparisonoflshapedandushapedbeamsinbidirectionalpiezoelectricvibrationenergyharvesting AT fangxudong comparisonoflshapedandushapedbeamsinbidirectionalpiezoelectricvibrationenergyharvesting AT maedaryutaro comparisonoflshapedandushapedbeamsinbidirectionalpiezoelectricvibrationenergyharvesting |