Cargando…
The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma
A single-institution observational study with 43 newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas defined the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) gene mutation status and evaluated the prognostic relevance of the methylation status of the epigenetic marker O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Young...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36361838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113034 |
_version_ | 1784828849205280768 |
---|---|
author | Jovanović, Nikola Lazarević, Milica Cvetković, Vladimir J. Nikolov, Vesna Kostić Perić, Jelena Ugrin, Milena Pavlović, Sonja Mitrović, Tatjana |
author_facet | Jovanović, Nikola Lazarević, Milica Cvetković, Vladimir J. Nikolov, Vesna Kostić Perić, Jelena Ugrin, Milena Pavlović, Sonja Mitrović, Tatjana |
author_sort | Jovanović, Nikola |
collection | PubMed |
description | A single-institution observational study with 43 newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas defined the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) gene mutation status and evaluated the prognostic relevance of the methylation status of the epigenetic marker O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Younger patients (<50 years) with surgically resected glioma and temozolomide (TMZ) adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with better prognosis, consistent with other studies. The methylation status depends on the chosen method and the cut-off value determination. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) established the methylation status for 36 glioma patients (19 (52.8%) positively methylated and 17 (47.2%) unmethylated) without relevancy for the overall survival (OS) (p = 0.33). On the other side, real-time methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) revealed 23 tumor samples (54%) that were positively methylated without association with OS (p = 0.15). A combined MSP analysis, which included the homogenous cohort of 24 patients (>50 years with surgical resection and IDH1/2-wildtype diffuse glioma), distinguished 10 (41.6%) methylated samples from 14 (58.4%) unmethylated samples. Finally, significant correlation between OS and methylation status was noticed (p ≈ 0.05). The OS of the hypermethylated group was 9.6 ± 1.77 months, whereas the OS of the unmethylated group was 5.43 ± 1.04 months. Our study recognized the MGMT promoter methylation status as a positive prognostic factor within the described homogenous cohort, although further verification in a larger population of diffuse gliomas is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9654114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96541142022-11-15 The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma Jovanović, Nikola Lazarević, Milica Cvetković, Vladimir J. Nikolov, Vesna Kostić Perić, Jelena Ugrin, Milena Pavlović, Sonja Mitrović, Tatjana Int J Mol Sci Article A single-institution observational study with 43 newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas defined the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) gene mutation status and evaluated the prognostic relevance of the methylation status of the epigenetic marker O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Younger patients (<50 years) with surgically resected glioma and temozolomide (TMZ) adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with better prognosis, consistent with other studies. The methylation status depends on the chosen method and the cut-off value determination. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) established the methylation status for 36 glioma patients (19 (52.8%) positively methylated and 17 (47.2%) unmethylated) without relevancy for the overall survival (OS) (p = 0.33). On the other side, real-time methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) revealed 23 tumor samples (54%) that were positively methylated without association with OS (p = 0.15). A combined MSP analysis, which included the homogenous cohort of 24 patients (>50 years with surgical resection and IDH1/2-wildtype diffuse glioma), distinguished 10 (41.6%) methylated samples from 14 (58.4%) unmethylated samples. Finally, significant correlation between OS and methylation status was noticed (p ≈ 0.05). The OS of the hypermethylated group was 9.6 ± 1.77 months, whereas the OS of the unmethylated group was 5.43 ± 1.04 months. Our study recognized the MGMT promoter methylation status as a positive prognostic factor within the described homogenous cohort, although further verification in a larger population of diffuse gliomas is required. MDPI 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9654114/ /pubmed/36361838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113034 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jovanović, Nikola Lazarević, Milica Cvetković, Vladimir J. Nikolov, Vesna Kostić Perić, Jelena Ugrin, Milena Pavlović, Sonja Mitrović, Tatjana The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma |
title | The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma |
title_full | The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma |
title_fullStr | The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma |
title_full_unstemmed | The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma |
title_short | The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma |
title_sort | significance of mgmt promoter methylation status in diffuse glioma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36361838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jovanovicnikola thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT lazarevicmilica thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT cvetkovicvladimirj thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT nikolovvesna thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT kosticpericjelena thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT ugrinmilena thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT pavlovicsonja thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT mitrovictatjana thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT jovanovicnikola significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT lazarevicmilica significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT cvetkovicvladimirj significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT nikolovvesna significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT kosticpericjelena significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT ugrinmilena significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT pavlovicsonja significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma AT mitrovictatjana significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma |