Cargando…

The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma

A single-institution observational study with 43 newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas defined the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) gene mutation status and evaluated the prognostic relevance of the methylation status of the epigenetic marker O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Young...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jovanović, Nikola, Lazarević, Milica, Cvetković, Vladimir J., Nikolov, Vesna, Kostić Perić, Jelena, Ugrin, Milena, Pavlović, Sonja, Mitrović, Tatjana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36361838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113034
_version_ 1784828849205280768
author Jovanović, Nikola
Lazarević, Milica
Cvetković, Vladimir J.
Nikolov, Vesna
Kostić Perić, Jelena
Ugrin, Milena
Pavlović, Sonja
Mitrović, Tatjana
author_facet Jovanović, Nikola
Lazarević, Milica
Cvetković, Vladimir J.
Nikolov, Vesna
Kostić Perić, Jelena
Ugrin, Milena
Pavlović, Sonja
Mitrović, Tatjana
author_sort Jovanović, Nikola
collection PubMed
description A single-institution observational study with 43 newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas defined the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) gene mutation status and evaluated the prognostic relevance of the methylation status of the epigenetic marker O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Younger patients (<50 years) with surgically resected glioma and temozolomide (TMZ) adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with better prognosis, consistent with other studies. The methylation status depends on the chosen method and the cut-off value determination. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) established the methylation status for 36 glioma patients (19 (52.8%) positively methylated and 17 (47.2%) unmethylated) without relevancy for the overall survival (OS) (p = 0.33). On the other side, real-time methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) revealed 23 tumor samples (54%) that were positively methylated without association with OS (p = 0.15). A combined MSP analysis, which included the homogenous cohort of 24 patients (>50 years with surgical resection and IDH1/2-wildtype diffuse glioma), distinguished 10 (41.6%) methylated samples from 14 (58.4%) unmethylated samples. Finally, significant correlation between OS and methylation status was noticed (p ≈ 0.05). The OS of the hypermethylated group was 9.6 ± 1.77 months, whereas the OS of the unmethylated group was 5.43 ± 1.04 months. Our study recognized the MGMT promoter methylation status as a positive prognostic factor within the described homogenous cohort, although further verification in a larger population of diffuse gliomas is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9654114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96541142022-11-15 The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma Jovanović, Nikola Lazarević, Milica Cvetković, Vladimir J. Nikolov, Vesna Kostić Perić, Jelena Ugrin, Milena Pavlović, Sonja Mitrović, Tatjana Int J Mol Sci Article A single-institution observational study with 43 newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas defined the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) gene mutation status and evaluated the prognostic relevance of the methylation status of the epigenetic marker O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Younger patients (<50 years) with surgically resected glioma and temozolomide (TMZ) adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with better prognosis, consistent with other studies. The methylation status depends on the chosen method and the cut-off value determination. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) established the methylation status for 36 glioma patients (19 (52.8%) positively methylated and 17 (47.2%) unmethylated) without relevancy for the overall survival (OS) (p = 0.33). On the other side, real-time methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) revealed 23 tumor samples (54%) that were positively methylated without association with OS (p = 0.15). A combined MSP analysis, which included the homogenous cohort of 24 patients (>50 years with surgical resection and IDH1/2-wildtype diffuse glioma), distinguished 10 (41.6%) methylated samples from 14 (58.4%) unmethylated samples. Finally, significant correlation between OS and methylation status was noticed (p ≈ 0.05). The OS of the hypermethylated group was 9.6 ± 1.77 months, whereas the OS of the unmethylated group was 5.43 ± 1.04 months. Our study recognized the MGMT promoter methylation status as a positive prognostic factor within the described homogenous cohort, although further verification in a larger population of diffuse gliomas is required. MDPI 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9654114/ /pubmed/36361838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113034 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jovanović, Nikola
Lazarević, Milica
Cvetković, Vladimir J.
Nikolov, Vesna
Kostić Perić, Jelena
Ugrin, Milena
Pavlović, Sonja
Mitrović, Tatjana
The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma
title The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma
title_full The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma
title_fullStr The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma
title_full_unstemmed The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma
title_short The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma
title_sort significance of mgmt promoter methylation status in diffuse glioma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36361838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113034
work_keys_str_mv AT jovanovicnikola thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT lazarevicmilica thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT cvetkovicvladimirj thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT nikolovvesna thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT kosticpericjelena thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT ugrinmilena thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT pavlovicsonja thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT mitrovictatjana thesignificanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT jovanovicnikola significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT lazarevicmilica significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT cvetkovicvladimirj significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT nikolovvesna significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT kosticpericjelena significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT ugrinmilena significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT pavlovicsonja significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma
AT mitrovictatjana significanceofmgmtpromotermethylationstatusindiffuseglioma