Cargando…

Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers

Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is influenced by body position. The purpose of this study is to compare the IOP measurements obtained with two different devices, to investigate IOP changes in standing, sitting, and supine positions. Methods: In this comparative prospective case series, IOP wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Bernardo, Maddalena, Abbinante, Giulia, Borrelli, Maria, Di Stasi, Margherita, Cione, Ferdinando, Rosa, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216234
_version_ 1784828954601848832
author De Bernardo, Maddalena
Abbinante, Giulia
Borrelli, Maria
Di Stasi, Margherita
Cione, Ferdinando
Rosa, Nicola
author_facet De Bernardo, Maddalena
Abbinante, Giulia
Borrelli, Maria
Di Stasi, Margherita
Cione, Ferdinando
Rosa, Nicola
author_sort De Bernardo, Maddalena
collection PubMed
description Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is influenced by body position. The purpose of this study is to compare the IOP measurements obtained with two different devices, to investigate IOP changes in standing, sitting, and supine positions. Methods: In this comparative prospective case series, IOP was measured in sitting, supine, prone, and standing (standing 1) positions and again five minutes after standing (standing 2), utilizing an Icare Pro (ICP) and a Tono-Pen Avia (TPA) in the 64 eyes of 32 healthy subjects. Results: Compared to the sitting position, both devices showed an increase in the IOP both in supine and standing 2 positions (p < 0.05). The mean IOP difference between the two devices was: in the sitting position, 0.57 ± 2.10 mmHg (range: −3.80 to 6.60 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the supine position, 0.93 ± 2.49 mmHg (range: −4.50 to 7.10 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the standing 1 position, 0.37 ± 1.96 mmHg (range: −5.20 to 5.00 mmHg) (p = 0.102), and in the standing 2 position 0.73 ± 2.03 mmHg (range: −4.5 to 6.4 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results highlight an agreement between the TPA and ICP, both confirming not only the increase in IOP in the supine position, but also showing an increase in the standing 2 position. Therefore, it is suggested to perform such measurements in patients with glaucoma, to explain its progression in an apparently normal tension or in compensated patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9654527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96545272022-11-15 Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers De Bernardo, Maddalena Abbinante, Giulia Borrelli, Maria Di Stasi, Margherita Cione, Ferdinando Rosa, Nicola J Clin Med Article Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is influenced by body position. The purpose of this study is to compare the IOP measurements obtained with two different devices, to investigate IOP changes in standing, sitting, and supine positions. Methods: In this comparative prospective case series, IOP was measured in sitting, supine, prone, and standing (standing 1) positions and again five minutes after standing (standing 2), utilizing an Icare Pro (ICP) and a Tono-Pen Avia (TPA) in the 64 eyes of 32 healthy subjects. Results: Compared to the sitting position, both devices showed an increase in the IOP both in supine and standing 2 positions (p < 0.05). The mean IOP difference between the two devices was: in the sitting position, 0.57 ± 2.10 mmHg (range: −3.80 to 6.60 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the supine position, 0.93 ± 2.49 mmHg (range: −4.50 to 7.10 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the standing 1 position, 0.37 ± 1.96 mmHg (range: −5.20 to 5.00 mmHg) (p = 0.102), and in the standing 2 position 0.73 ± 2.03 mmHg (range: −4.5 to 6.4 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results highlight an agreement between the TPA and ICP, both confirming not only the increase in IOP in the supine position, but also showing an increase in the standing 2 position. Therefore, it is suggested to perform such measurements in patients with glaucoma, to explain its progression in an apparently normal tension or in compensated patients. MDPI 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9654527/ /pubmed/36362460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216234 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
De Bernardo, Maddalena
Abbinante, Giulia
Borrelli, Maria
Di Stasi, Margherita
Cione, Ferdinando
Rosa, Nicola
Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers
title Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers
title_full Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers
title_fullStr Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers
title_full_unstemmed Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers
title_short Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers
title_sort intraocular pressure measurements in standing, sitting, and supine position: comparison between tono-pen avia and icare pro tonometers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216234
work_keys_str_mv AT debernardomaddalena intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers
AT abbinantegiulia intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers
AT borrellimaria intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers
AT distasimargherita intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers
AT cioneferdinando intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers
AT rosanicola intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers