Cargando…
Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers
Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is influenced by body position. The purpose of this study is to compare the IOP measurements obtained with two different devices, to investigate IOP changes in standing, sitting, and supine positions. Methods: In this comparative prospective case series, IOP wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216234 |
_version_ | 1784828954601848832 |
---|---|
author | De Bernardo, Maddalena Abbinante, Giulia Borrelli, Maria Di Stasi, Margherita Cione, Ferdinando Rosa, Nicola |
author_facet | De Bernardo, Maddalena Abbinante, Giulia Borrelli, Maria Di Stasi, Margherita Cione, Ferdinando Rosa, Nicola |
author_sort | De Bernardo, Maddalena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is influenced by body position. The purpose of this study is to compare the IOP measurements obtained with two different devices, to investigate IOP changes in standing, sitting, and supine positions. Methods: In this comparative prospective case series, IOP was measured in sitting, supine, prone, and standing (standing 1) positions and again five minutes after standing (standing 2), utilizing an Icare Pro (ICP) and a Tono-Pen Avia (TPA) in the 64 eyes of 32 healthy subjects. Results: Compared to the sitting position, both devices showed an increase in the IOP both in supine and standing 2 positions (p < 0.05). The mean IOP difference between the two devices was: in the sitting position, 0.57 ± 2.10 mmHg (range: −3.80 to 6.60 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the supine position, 0.93 ± 2.49 mmHg (range: −4.50 to 7.10 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the standing 1 position, 0.37 ± 1.96 mmHg (range: −5.20 to 5.00 mmHg) (p = 0.102), and in the standing 2 position 0.73 ± 2.03 mmHg (range: −4.5 to 6.4 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results highlight an agreement between the TPA and ICP, both confirming not only the increase in IOP in the supine position, but also showing an increase in the standing 2 position. Therefore, it is suggested to perform such measurements in patients with glaucoma, to explain its progression in an apparently normal tension or in compensated patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9654527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96545272022-11-15 Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers De Bernardo, Maddalena Abbinante, Giulia Borrelli, Maria Di Stasi, Margherita Cione, Ferdinando Rosa, Nicola J Clin Med Article Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is influenced by body position. The purpose of this study is to compare the IOP measurements obtained with two different devices, to investigate IOP changes in standing, sitting, and supine positions. Methods: In this comparative prospective case series, IOP was measured in sitting, supine, prone, and standing (standing 1) positions and again five minutes after standing (standing 2), utilizing an Icare Pro (ICP) and a Tono-Pen Avia (TPA) in the 64 eyes of 32 healthy subjects. Results: Compared to the sitting position, both devices showed an increase in the IOP both in supine and standing 2 positions (p < 0.05). The mean IOP difference between the two devices was: in the sitting position, 0.57 ± 2.10 mmHg (range: −3.80 to 6.60 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the supine position, 0.93 ± 2.49 mmHg (range: −4.50 to 7.10 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the standing 1 position, 0.37 ± 1.96 mmHg (range: −5.20 to 5.00 mmHg) (p = 0.102), and in the standing 2 position 0.73 ± 2.03 mmHg (range: −4.5 to 6.4 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results highlight an agreement between the TPA and ICP, both confirming not only the increase in IOP in the supine position, but also showing an increase in the standing 2 position. Therefore, it is suggested to perform such measurements in patients with glaucoma, to explain its progression in an apparently normal tension or in compensated patients. MDPI 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9654527/ /pubmed/36362460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216234 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article De Bernardo, Maddalena Abbinante, Giulia Borrelli, Maria Di Stasi, Margherita Cione, Ferdinando Rosa, Nicola Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers |
title | Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers |
title_full | Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers |
title_fullStr | Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers |
title_short | Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers |
title_sort | intraocular pressure measurements in standing, sitting, and supine position: comparison between tono-pen avia and icare pro tonometers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debernardomaddalena intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers AT abbinantegiulia intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers AT borrellimaria intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers AT distasimargherita intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers AT cioneferdinando intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers AT rosanicola intraocularpressuremeasurementsinstandingsittingandsupinepositioncomparisonbetweentonopenaviaandicareprotonometers |