共价有机框架材料磁固相萃取-高效液相色谱法分析环境水体中对羟基苯甲酸酯

Parabens are a class of antimicrobial preservatives that are widely used in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and food products because of their ease of production, antimicrobial effect, and low price. The widespread use of these parabens, poses potential risks to human health. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a simple and rapid method for the detection of parabens. The large number of substrate interferences in complex samples is an important factor affecting the sensitivity of analytical methods. Magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) has received much attention because of its advantages of easy operation, short extraction time, small sample amount, low cost, and environmental friendliness. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) with high crystallinity, high specific surface area, adjustable pore size, regular porosity, as well as high chemical and thermal stability are now widely used in separation and analysis. Therefore, a sample pretreatment method combining MSPE and COF for the analysis of parabens in complex matrices is very promising. A magnetic covalent organic framework, Fe(3)O(4)@TbBd, was successfully synthesized by the Schiff base reaction of 1,3,5-triformylbenzene (Tb) and benzidine (Bd) at room temperature using Fe(3)O(4) nanoparticles as magnetic cores. Characterization by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) measurements, etc. revealed that the magnetic COF has high magnetic responsiveness, as well as good thermal and chemical stability, which make it an ideal adsorbent for the MSPE of parabens. Some factors related to the extraction efficiency, including the amount of adsorbent, extraction time, pH, desorption solvent, desorption time, and number of desorption were systematically investigated. A method involving MSPE and high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) based on the Fe(3)O(4)@TbBd was developed for the determination of four parabens (ethylparaben, propylparaben, butylparaben, and benzylparaben) in environmental water samples. Under the optimal extraction conditions, the method showed good linearities. The limits of detection and limits of quantification were 0.2-0.4 μg/L and 0.7-1.4 μg/L for the four analytes, respectively. The recoveries at three spiked levels were in the range of 86.1%-110.8% with intra-day and inter-day RSDs of less than 5.5% and 4.9%, respectively. The method was successfully applied to the determination of parabens in East Lake water, Yangtze water, and domestic wastewater. Ethyl paraben and propyl paraben were detected in domestic wastewater at the levels of 1.8 μg/L and 0.4 μg/L, respectively. The recoveries of the parabens at different spiked levels ranged from 80.7% to 117.5%, with RSDs of 0.2%-8.8%. The method has good potential for the determination of parabens in environmental water samples because of its operational simplicity, short extraction time, high sensitivity, and environmental friendliness.