Cargando…

Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels

This study explores differences in characteristics and relationship treatment preferences across different levels of intimate partner violence (IPV) among Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients. In Fall 2019, we sent a mail-in survey assessing relationship healthcare needs to N = 299 Veterans r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crasta, Dev, Crane, Cory A., Trabold, Nicole, Shepardson, Robyn L., Possemato, Kyle, Funderburk, Jennifer S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360867
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113984
_version_ 1784829002857316352
author Crasta, Dev
Crane, Cory A.
Trabold, Nicole
Shepardson, Robyn L.
Possemato, Kyle
Funderburk, Jennifer S.
author_facet Crasta, Dev
Crane, Cory A.
Trabold, Nicole
Shepardson, Robyn L.
Possemato, Kyle
Funderburk, Jennifer S.
author_sort Crasta, Dev
collection PubMed
description This study explores differences in characteristics and relationship treatment preferences across different levels of intimate partner violence (IPV) among Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients. In Fall 2019, we sent a mail-in survey assessing relationship healthcare needs to N = 299 Veterans randomly sampled from 20 northeastern VA primary care clinics (oversampling female and younger Veterans). We compared those reporting past year use or experience of physical/sexual aggression, threats/coercion, or injury (Severe IPV; 21%), to those only reporting yelling and screaming (Verbal Conflict; 51%), and denying any IPV (No IPV; 28%). Participants across groups desired 2–6 sessions of face-to-face support for couples’ health and communication. No IPV participants were older and had preferred treatment in primary care. The Verbal Conflict and Severe IPV groups were both flagged by IPV screens and had similar interest in couple treatment and relationship evaluation. The Severe IPV group had higher rates of harms (e.g., depression, alcohol use disorder, relationship dissatisfaction, fear of partner) and higher interest in addressing safety outside of VA. Exploratory analyses suggested differences based on use vs. experience of Severe IPV. Findings highlight ways integrated primary care teams can differentiate services to address dissatisfaction and conflict while facilitating referrals for Severe IPV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9654718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96547182022-11-15 Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels Crasta, Dev Crane, Cory A. Trabold, Nicole Shepardson, Robyn L. Possemato, Kyle Funderburk, Jennifer S. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study explores differences in characteristics and relationship treatment preferences across different levels of intimate partner violence (IPV) among Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients. In Fall 2019, we sent a mail-in survey assessing relationship healthcare needs to N = 299 Veterans randomly sampled from 20 northeastern VA primary care clinics (oversampling female and younger Veterans). We compared those reporting past year use or experience of physical/sexual aggression, threats/coercion, or injury (Severe IPV; 21%), to those only reporting yelling and screaming (Verbal Conflict; 51%), and denying any IPV (No IPV; 28%). Participants across groups desired 2–6 sessions of face-to-face support for couples’ health and communication. No IPV participants were older and had preferred treatment in primary care. The Verbal Conflict and Severe IPV groups were both flagged by IPV screens and had similar interest in couple treatment and relationship evaluation. The Severe IPV group had higher rates of harms (e.g., depression, alcohol use disorder, relationship dissatisfaction, fear of partner) and higher interest in addressing safety outside of VA. Exploratory analyses suggested differences based on use vs. experience of Severe IPV. Findings highlight ways integrated primary care teams can differentiate services to address dissatisfaction and conflict while facilitating referrals for Severe IPV. MDPI 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9654718/ /pubmed/36360867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113984 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Crasta, Dev
Crane, Cory A.
Trabold, Nicole
Shepardson, Robyn L.
Possemato, Kyle
Funderburk, Jennifer S.
Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels
title Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels
title_full Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels
title_fullStr Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels
title_full_unstemmed Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels
title_short Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels
title_sort relationship health and intimate partner violence in integrated primary care: individual characteristics and preferences for relationship support across risk levels
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360867
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113984
work_keys_str_mv AT crastadev relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels
AT cranecorya relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels
AT traboldnicole relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels
AT shepardsonrobynl relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels
AT possematokyle relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels
AT funderburkjennifers relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels