Cargando…
Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels
This study explores differences in characteristics and relationship treatment preferences across different levels of intimate partner violence (IPV) among Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients. In Fall 2019, we sent a mail-in survey assessing relationship healthcare needs to N = 299 Veterans r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113984 |
_version_ | 1784829002857316352 |
---|---|
author | Crasta, Dev Crane, Cory A. Trabold, Nicole Shepardson, Robyn L. Possemato, Kyle Funderburk, Jennifer S. |
author_facet | Crasta, Dev Crane, Cory A. Trabold, Nicole Shepardson, Robyn L. Possemato, Kyle Funderburk, Jennifer S. |
author_sort | Crasta, Dev |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study explores differences in characteristics and relationship treatment preferences across different levels of intimate partner violence (IPV) among Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients. In Fall 2019, we sent a mail-in survey assessing relationship healthcare needs to N = 299 Veterans randomly sampled from 20 northeastern VA primary care clinics (oversampling female and younger Veterans). We compared those reporting past year use or experience of physical/sexual aggression, threats/coercion, or injury (Severe IPV; 21%), to those only reporting yelling and screaming (Verbal Conflict; 51%), and denying any IPV (No IPV; 28%). Participants across groups desired 2–6 sessions of face-to-face support for couples’ health and communication. No IPV participants were older and had preferred treatment in primary care. The Verbal Conflict and Severe IPV groups were both flagged by IPV screens and had similar interest in couple treatment and relationship evaluation. The Severe IPV group had higher rates of harms (e.g., depression, alcohol use disorder, relationship dissatisfaction, fear of partner) and higher interest in addressing safety outside of VA. Exploratory analyses suggested differences based on use vs. experience of Severe IPV. Findings highlight ways integrated primary care teams can differentiate services to address dissatisfaction and conflict while facilitating referrals for Severe IPV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9654718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96547182022-11-15 Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels Crasta, Dev Crane, Cory A. Trabold, Nicole Shepardson, Robyn L. Possemato, Kyle Funderburk, Jennifer S. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study explores differences in characteristics and relationship treatment preferences across different levels of intimate partner violence (IPV) among Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients. In Fall 2019, we sent a mail-in survey assessing relationship healthcare needs to N = 299 Veterans randomly sampled from 20 northeastern VA primary care clinics (oversampling female and younger Veterans). We compared those reporting past year use or experience of physical/sexual aggression, threats/coercion, or injury (Severe IPV; 21%), to those only reporting yelling and screaming (Verbal Conflict; 51%), and denying any IPV (No IPV; 28%). Participants across groups desired 2–6 sessions of face-to-face support for couples’ health and communication. No IPV participants were older and had preferred treatment in primary care. The Verbal Conflict and Severe IPV groups were both flagged by IPV screens and had similar interest in couple treatment and relationship evaluation. The Severe IPV group had higher rates of harms (e.g., depression, alcohol use disorder, relationship dissatisfaction, fear of partner) and higher interest in addressing safety outside of VA. Exploratory analyses suggested differences based on use vs. experience of Severe IPV. Findings highlight ways integrated primary care teams can differentiate services to address dissatisfaction and conflict while facilitating referrals for Severe IPV. MDPI 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9654718/ /pubmed/36360867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113984 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Crasta, Dev Crane, Cory A. Trabold, Nicole Shepardson, Robyn L. Possemato, Kyle Funderburk, Jennifer S. Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels |
title | Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels |
title_full | Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels |
title_fullStr | Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels |
title_short | Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care: Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels |
title_sort | relationship health and intimate partner violence in integrated primary care: individual characteristics and preferences for relationship support across risk levels |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113984 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crastadev relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels AT cranecorya relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels AT traboldnicole relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels AT shepardsonrobynl relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels AT possematokyle relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels AT funderburkjennifers relationshiphealthandintimatepartnerviolenceinintegratedprimarycareindividualcharacteristicsandpreferencesforrelationshipsupportacrossrisklevels |