Cargando…
Erroneous Vehicle Velocity Estimation Correction Using Anisotropic Magnetoresistive (AMR) Sensors
Magnetic field sensors installed in the road infrastructure can be used for autonomous traffic flow parametrization. Although the main goal of such a measuring system is the recognition of the class of vehicle and classification, velocity is the essential parameter for further calculation and it mus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36365966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218269 |
_version_ | 1784829022328324096 |
---|---|
author | Miklusis, Donatas Markevicius, Vytautas Navikas, Dangirutis Ambraziunas, Mantas Cepenas, Mindaugas Valinevicius, Algimantas Zilys, Mindaugas Okarma, Krzysztof Cuinas, Inigo Andriukaitis, Darius |
author_facet | Miklusis, Donatas Markevicius, Vytautas Navikas, Dangirutis Ambraziunas, Mantas Cepenas, Mindaugas Valinevicius, Algimantas Zilys, Mindaugas Okarma, Krzysztof Cuinas, Inigo Andriukaitis, Darius |
author_sort | Miklusis, Donatas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Magnetic field sensors installed in the road infrastructure can be used for autonomous traffic flow parametrization. Although the main goal of such a measuring system is the recognition of the class of vehicle and classification, velocity is the essential parameter for further calculation and it must be estimated with high reliability. In-field test campaigns, during actual traffic conditions, showed that commonly accepted velocity estimation methods occasionally produce highly erroneous results. For anomaly detection, we propose a criterion and two different correction algorithms. Non-linear signal rescaling and time-based segmentation algorithms are presented and compared for faulty result mitigation. The first one consists of suppressing the highly distorted signal peaks and looking for the best match with cross-correlation. The second approach relies on signals segmentation according to the feature points and multiple cross-correlation comparisons. The proposed two algorithms are evaluated with a dataset of over 300 magnetic signatures of a vehicle from unconstraint traffic conditions. Results show that the proposed criteria highlight all greatly faulty results and that the correction algorithms reduce the maximum error by twofold, but due to the increased mean error, mitigation technics shall be used explicitly with distorted signals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9654797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96547972022-11-15 Erroneous Vehicle Velocity Estimation Correction Using Anisotropic Magnetoresistive (AMR) Sensors Miklusis, Donatas Markevicius, Vytautas Navikas, Dangirutis Ambraziunas, Mantas Cepenas, Mindaugas Valinevicius, Algimantas Zilys, Mindaugas Okarma, Krzysztof Cuinas, Inigo Andriukaitis, Darius Sensors (Basel) Article Magnetic field sensors installed in the road infrastructure can be used for autonomous traffic flow parametrization. Although the main goal of such a measuring system is the recognition of the class of vehicle and classification, velocity is the essential parameter for further calculation and it must be estimated with high reliability. In-field test campaigns, during actual traffic conditions, showed that commonly accepted velocity estimation methods occasionally produce highly erroneous results. For anomaly detection, we propose a criterion and two different correction algorithms. Non-linear signal rescaling and time-based segmentation algorithms are presented and compared for faulty result mitigation. The first one consists of suppressing the highly distorted signal peaks and looking for the best match with cross-correlation. The second approach relies on signals segmentation according to the feature points and multiple cross-correlation comparisons. The proposed two algorithms are evaluated with a dataset of over 300 magnetic signatures of a vehicle from unconstraint traffic conditions. Results show that the proposed criteria highlight all greatly faulty results and that the correction algorithms reduce the maximum error by twofold, but due to the increased mean error, mitigation technics shall be used explicitly with distorted signals. MDPI 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9654797/ /pubmed/36365966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218269 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Miklusis, Donatas Markevicius, Vytautas Navikas, Dangirutis Ambraziunas, Mantas Cepenas, Mindaugas Valinevicius, Algimantas Zilys, Mindaugas Okarma, Krzysztof Cuinas, Inigo Andriukaitis, Darius Erroneous Vehicle Velocity Estimation Correction Using Anisotropic Magnetoresistive (AMR) Sensors |
title | Erroneous Vehicle Velocity Estimation Correction Using Anisotropic Magnetoresistive (AMR) Sensors |
title_full | Erroneous Vehicle Velocity Estimation Correction Using Anisotropic Magnetoresistive (AMR) Sensors |
title_fullStr | Erroneous Vehicle Velocity Estimation Correction Using Anisotropic Magnetoresistive (AMR) Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Erroneous Vehicle Velocity Estimation Correction Using Anisotropic Magnetoresistive (AMR) Sensors |
title_short | Erroneous Vehicle Velocity Estimation Correction Using Anisotropic Magnetoresistive (AMR) Sensors |
title_sort | erroneous vehicle velocity estimation correction using anisotropic magnetoresistive (amr) sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9654797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36365966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218269 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miklusisdonatas erroneousvehiclevelocityestimationcorrectionusinganisotropicmagnetoresistiveamrsensors AT markeviciusvytautas erroneousvehiclevelocityestimationcorrectionusinganisotropicmagnetoresistiveamrsensors AT navikasdangirutis erroneousvehiclevelocityestimationcorrectionusinganisotropicmagnetoresistiveamrsensors AT ambraziunasmantas erroneousvehiclevelocityestimationcorrectionusinganisotropicmagnetoresistiveamrsensors AT cepenasmindaugas erroneousvehiclevelocityestimationcorrectionusinganisotropicmagnetoresistiveamrsensors AT valineviciusalgimantas erroneousvehiclevelocityestimationcorrectionusinganisotropicmagnetoresistiveamrsensors AT zilysmindaugas erroneousvehiclevelocityestimationcorrectionusinganisotropicmagnetoresistiveamrsensors AT okarmakrzysztof erroneousvehiclevelocityestimationcorrectionusinganisotropicmagnetoresistiveamrsensors AT cuinasinigo erroneousvehiclevelocityestimationcorrectionusinganisotropicmagnetoresistiveamrsensors AT andriukaitisdarius erroneousvehiclevelocityestimationcorrectionusinganisotropicmagnetoresistiveamrsensors |