Cargando…

Ophthalmology Practice and Social Media Influences: A Patients Based Cross-Sectional Study among Social Media Users

Many physicians consider social media a good tool for building their brands and attracting patients. However, limited data exist on patients’ perceptions of the value of social media in ophthalmology. Therefore, our objective was to examine how social media influences patients when choosing an ophth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ALBalawi, Hani B., Alraddadi, Osama
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360788
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113911
_version_ 1784829085221912576
author ALBalawi, Hani B.
Alraddadi, Osama
author_facet ALBalawi, Hani B.
Alraddadi, Osama
author_sort ALBalawi, Hani B.
collection PubMed
description Many physicians consider social media a good tool for building their brands and attracting patients. However, limited data exist on patients’ perceptions of the value of social media in ophthalmology. Therefore, our objective was to examine how social media influences patients when choosing an ophthalmologist among social media users, and people’s behaviors toward ophthalmologists’ social media accounts. This was a cross-sectional study including 1086 participants. Males represented 77.3% of the sample. The majority of the participants (71.3%) were aged between 25 and 54 years. Regarding social media sites frequently checked, Twitter ranked first (75.3%), followed by Snapchat (52.8%) and YouTube (48.7%). The majority (92.3%) used social media sites at all times of the day. Concerning the importance of ophthalmologists’ social media sites, around 36.3% considered it either very or extremely important. As regards the important factors about an ophthalmologist’s social media site from participants’ perspectives, medical information written by the ophthalmologist (45.5%) and recommendations by friends (45.4%) were the most common reasons. Around 21% of females, compared to 16.8% of males, perceived the ophthalmologists’ social media sites as extremely important, p = 0.041. A quarter of participants aged between 18 and 24 years, compared to only 5.5% of those aged 65 and above, perceived the ophthalmologists’ social media sites as extremely important, p = 0.018. In conclusion, a considerable proportion of the people who used social media described ophthalmologists’ social media sites as very/extremely important in their choice of an ophthalmologist.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9655030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96550302022-11-15 Ophthalmology Practice and Social Media Influences: A Patients Based Cross-Sectional Study among Social Media Users ALBalawi, Hani B. Alraddadi, Osama Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Many physicians consider social media a good tool for building their brands and attracting patients. However, limited data exist on patients’ perceptions of the value of social media in ophthalmology. Therefore, our objective was to examine how social media influences patients when choosing an ophthalmologist among social media users, and people’s behaviors toward ophthalmologists’ social media accounts. This was a cross-sectional study including 1086 participants. Males represented 77.3% of the sample. The majority of the participants (71.3%) were aged between 25 and 54 years. Regarding social media sites frequently checked, Twitter ranked first (75.3%), followed by Snapchat (52.8%) and YouTube (48.7%). The majority (92.3%) used social media sites at all times of the day. Concerning the importance of ophthalmologists’ social media sites, around 36.3% considered it either very or extremely important. As regards the important factors about an ophthalmologist’s social media site from participants’ perspectives, medical information written by the ophthalmologist (45.5%) and recommendations by friends (45.4%) were the most common reasons. Around 21% of females, compared to 16.8% of males, perceived the ophthalmologists’ social media sites as extremely important, p = 0.041. A quarter of participants aged between 18 and 24 years, compared to only 5.5% of those aged 65 and above, perceived the ophthalmologists’ social media sites as extremely important, p = 0.018. In conclusion, a considerable proportion of the people who used social media described ophthalmologists’ social media sites as very/extremely important in their choice of an ophthalmologist. MDPI 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9655030/ /pubmed/36360788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113911 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
ALBalawi, Hani B.
Alraddadi, Osama
Ophthalmology Practice and Social Media Influences: A Patients Based Cross-Sectional Study among Social Media Users
title Ophthalmology Practice and Social Media Influences: A Patients Based Cross-Sectional Study among Social Media Users
title_full Ophthalmology Practice and Social Media Influences: A Patients Based Cross-Sectional Study among Social Media Users
title_fullStr Ophthalmology Practice and Social Media Influences: A Patients Based Cross-Sectional Study among Social Media Users
title_full_unstemmed Ophthalmology Practice and Social Media Influences: A Patients Based Cross-Sectional Study among Social Media Users
title_short Ophthalmology Practice and Social Media Influences: A Patients Based Cross-Sectional Study among Social Media Users
title_sort ophthalmology practice and social media influences: a patients based cross-sectional study among social media users
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360788
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113911
work_keys_str_mv AT albalawihanib ophthalmologypracticeandsocialmediainfluencesapatientsbasedcrosssectionalstudyamongsocialmediausers
AT alraddadiosama ophthalmologypracticeandsocialmediainfluencesapatientsbasedcrosssectionalstudyamongsocialmediausers