Cargando…

Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process

This study aimed to assess the reliability of two intraoral surface scanners for the representation of the alveolar process in vivo. Complete maxillary scans (CS 3600, Carestream and TRIOS 3, 3Shape) were repeatedly obtained from 13 fully dentate individuals. Scanner precision and agreement were tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winkler, Jonas, Sculean, Anton, Gkantidis, Nikolaos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362615
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216389
_version_ 1784829091312041984
author Winkler, Jonas
Sculean, Anton
Gkantidis, Nikolaos
author_facet Winkler, Jonas
Sculean, Anton
Gkantidis, Nikolaos
author_sort Winkler, Jonas
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to assess the reliability of two intraoral surface scanners for the representation of the alveolar process in vivo. Complete maxillary scans (CS 3600, Carestream and TRIOS 3, 3Shape) were repeatedly obtained from 13 fully dentate individuals. Scanner precision and agreement were tested using 3D surface superimpositions on the following reference areas: the buccal front teeth area, the entire dental arch, the entire alveolar process, or single teeth by applying an iterative closest point algorithm. Following each superimposition, the mean absolute distance (MAD) between predefined 3D model surfaces was calculated. Outcomes were analyzed through non-parametric statistics and the visualization of color-coded distance maps. When superimpositions were performed on the alveolar process, the median scanner precision was below 0.05 mm, with statistically significant but negligible differences between scanners. The agreement between the scanners was approximately 0.06 mm. When single-tooth superimpositions were used to assess the precision of adjacent alveolar soft-tissue surfaces, the median error was 0.028 mm, and there was higher agreement between the scanners. The in vivo reliability of the intraoral scanners in the alveolar surface area was high overall. Single-tooth superimpositions should be preferred for the optimal assessment of neighboring alveolar surface areas relative to the dentition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9655054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96550542022-11-15 Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process Winkler, Jonas Sculean, Anton Gkantidis, Nikolaos J Clin Med Article This study aimed to assess the reliability of two intraoral surface scanners for the representation of the alveolar process in vivo. Complete maxillary scans (CS 3600, Carestream and TRIOS 3, 3Shape) were repeatedly obtained from 13 fully dentate individuals. Scanner precision and agreement were tested using 3D surface superimpositions on the following reference areas: the buccal front teeth area, the entire dental arch, the entire alveolar process, or single teeth by applying an iterative closest point algorithm. Following each superimposition, the mean absolute distance (MAD) between predefined 3D model surfaces was calculated. Outcomes were analyzed through non-parametric statistics and the visualization of color-coded distance maps. When superimpositions were performed on the alveolar process, the median scanner precision was below 0.05 mm, with statistically significant but negligible differences between scanners. The agreement between the scanners was approximately 0.06 mm. When single-tooth superimpositions were used to assess the precision of adjacent alveolar soft-tissue surfaces, the median error was 0.028 mm, and there was higher agreement between the scanners. The in vivo reliability of the intraoral scanners in the alveolar surface area was high overall. Single-tooth superimpositions should be preferred for the optimal assessment of neighboring alveolar surface areas relative to the dentition. MDPI 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9655054/ /pubmed/36362615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216389 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Winkler, Jonas
Sculean, Anton
Gkantidis, Nikolaos
Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process
title Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process
title_full Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process
title_fullStr Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process
title_full_unstemmed Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process
title_short Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process
title_sort intraoral scanners for in vivo 3d imaging of the gingiva and the alveolar process
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362615
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216389
work_keys_str_mv AT winklerjonas intraoralscannersforinvivo3dimagingofthegingivaandthealveolarprocess
AT sculeananton intraoralscannersforinvivo3dimagingofthegingivaandthealveolarprocess
AT gkantidisnikolaos intraoralscannersforinvivo3dimagingofthegingivaandthealveolarprocess