Cargando…
Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process
This study aimed to assess the reliability of two intraoral surface scanners for the representation of the alveolar process in vivo. Complete maxillary scans (CS 3600, Carestream and TRIOS 3, 3Shape) were repeatedly obtained from 13 fully dentate individuals. Scanner precision and agreement were tes...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216389 |
_version_ | 1784829091312041984 |
---|---|
author | Winkler, Jonas Sculean, Anton Gkantidis, Nikolaos |
author_facet | Winkler, Jonas Sculean, Anton Gkantidis, Nikolaos |
author_sort | Winkler, Jonas |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to assess the reliability of two intraoral surface scanners for the representation of the alveolar process in vivo. Complete maxillary scans (CS 3600, Carestream and TRIOS 3, 3Shape) were repeatedly obtained from 13 fully dentate individuals. Scanner precision and agreement were tested using 3D surface superimpositions on the following reference areas: the buccal front teeth area, the entire dental arch, the entire alveolar process, or single teeth by applying an iterative closest point algorithm. Following each superimposition, the mean absolute distance (MAD) between predefined 3D model surfaces was calculated. Outcomes were analyzed through non-parametric statistics and the visualization of color-coded distance maps. When superimpositions were performed on the alveolar process, the median scanner precision was below 0.05 mm, with statistically significant but negligible differences between scanners. The agreement between the scanners was approximately 0.06 mm. When single-tooth superimpositions were used to assess the precision of adjacent alveolar soft-tissue surfaces, the median error was 0.028 mm, and there was higher agreement between the scanners. The in vivo reliability of the intraoral scanners in the alveolar surface area was high overall. Single-tooth superimpositions should be preferred for the optimal assessment of neighboring alveolar surface areas relative to the dentition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9655054 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96550542022-11-15 Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process Winkler, Jonas Sculean, Anton Gkantidis, Nikolaos J Clin Med Article This study aimed to assess the reliability of two intraoral surface scanners for the representation of the alveolar process in vivo. Complete maxillary scans (CS 3600, Carestream and TRIOS 3, 3Shape) were repeatedly obtained from 13 fully dentate individuals. Scanner precision and agreement were tested using 3D surface superimpositions on the following reference areas: the buccal front teeth area, the entire dental arch, the entire alveolar process, or single teeth by applying an iterative closest point algorithm. Following each superimposition, the mean absolute distance (MAD) between predefined 3D model surfaces was calculated. Outcomes were analyzed through non-parametric statistics and the visualization of color-coded distance maps. When superimpositions were performed on the alveolar process, the median scanner precision was below 0.05 mm, with statistically significant but negligible differences between scanners. The agreement between the scanners was approximately 0.06 mm. When single-tooth superimpositions were used to assess the precision of adjacent alveolar soft-tissue surfaces, the median error was 0.028 mm, and there was higher agreement between the scanners. The in vivo reliability of the intraoral scanners in the alveolar surface area was high overall. Single-tooth superimpositions should be preferred for the optimal assessment of neighboring alveolar surface areas relative to the dentition. MDPI 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9655054/ /pubmed/36362615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216389 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Winkler, Jonas Sculean, Anton Gkantidis, Nikolaos Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process |
title | Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process |
title_full | Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process |
title_fullStr | Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process |
title_short | Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process |
title_sort | intraoral scanners for in vivo 3d imaging of the gingiva and the alveolar process |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216389 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT winklerjonas intraoralscannersforinvivo3dimagingofthegingivaandthealveolarprocess AT sculeananton intraoralscannersforinvivo3dimagingofthegingivaandthealveolarprocess AT gkantidisnikolaos intraoralscannersforinvivo3dimagingofthegingivaandthealveolarprocess |