Cargando…
Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review
Hepatocellular carcinoma ranks fifth amongst the most common malignancies and is the third most common cause of cancer-related death globally. Artificial Intelligence is a rapidly growing field of interest. Following the PRISMA reporting guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to retrieve artic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216368 |
_version_ | 1784829180724117504 |
---|---|
author | Martinino, Alessandro Aloulou, Mohammad Chatterjee, Surobhi Scarano Pereira, Juan Pablo Singhal, Saurabh Patel, Tapan Kirchgesner, Thomas Paul-Emile Agnes, Salvatore Annunziata, Salvatore Treglia, Giorgio Giovinazzo, Francesco |
author_facet | Martinino, Alessandro Aloulou, Mohammad Chatterjee, Surobhi Scarano Pereira, Juan Pablo Singhal, Saurabh Patel, Tapan Kirchgesner, Thomas Paul-Emile Agnes, Salvatore Annunziata, Salvatore Treglia, Giorgio Giovinazzo, Francesco |
author_sort | Martinino, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hepatocellular carcinoma ranks fifth amongst the most common malignancies and is the third most common cause of cancer-related death globally. Artificial Intelligence is a rapidly growing field of interest. Following the PRISMA reporting guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to retrieve articles reporting the application of AI in HCC detection and characterization. A total of 27 articles were included and analyzed with our composite score for the evaluation of the quality of the publications. The contingency table reported a statistically significant constant improvement over the years of the total quality score (p = 0.004). Different AI methods have been adopted in the included articles correlated with 19 articles studying CT (41.30%), 20 studying US (43.47%), and 7 studying MRI (15.21%). No article has discussed the use of artificial intelligence in PET and X-ray technology. Our systematic approach has shown that previous works in HCC detection and characterization have assessed the comparability of conventional interpretation with machine learning using US, CT, and MRI. The distribution of the imaging techniques in our analysis reflects the usefulness and evolution of medical imaging for the diagnosis of HCC. Moreover, our results highlight an imminent need for data sharing in collaborative data repositories to minimize unnecessary repetition and wastage of resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9655417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96554172022-11-15 Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review Martinino, Alessandro Aloulou, Mohammad Chatterjee, Surobhi Scarano Pereira, Juan Pablo Singhal, Saurabh Patel, Tapan Kirchgesner, Thomas Paul-Emile Agnes, Salvatore Annunziata, Salvatore Treglia, Giorgio Giovinazzo, Francesco J Clin Med Systematic Review Hepatocellular carcinoma ranks fifth amongst the most common malignancies and is the third most common cause of cancer-related death globally. Artificial Intelligence is a rapidly growing field of interest. Following the PRISMA reporting guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to retrieve articles reporting the application of AI in HCC detection and characterization. A total of 27 articles were included and analyzed with our composite score for the evaluation of the quality of the publications. The contingency table reported a statistically significant constant improvement over the years of the total quality score (p = 0.004). Different AI methods have been adopted in the included articles correlated with 19 articles studying CT (41.30%), 20 studying US (43.47%), and 7 studying MRI (15.21%). No article has discussed the use of artificial intelligence in PET and X-ray technology. Our systematic approach has shown that previous works in HCC detection and characterization have assessed the comparability of conventional interpretation with machine learning using US, CT, and MRI. The distribution of the imaging techniques in our analysis reflects the usefulness and evolution of medical imaging for the diagnosis of HCC. Moreover, our results highlight an imminent need for data sharing in collaborative data repositories to minimize unnecessary repetition and wastage of resources. MDPI 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9655417/ /pubmed/36362596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216368 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Martinino, Alessandro Aloulou, Mohammad Chatterjee, Surobhi Scarano Pereira, Juan Pablo Singhal, Saurabh Patel, Tapan Kirchgesner, Thomas Paul-Emile Agnes, Salvatore Annunziata, Salvatore Treglia, Giorgio Giovinazzo, Francesco Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review |
title | Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216368 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martininoalessandro artificialintelligenceinthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview AT alouloumohammad artificialintelligenceinthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview AT chatterjeesurobhi artificialintelligenceinthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview AT scaranopereirajuanpablo artificialintelligenceinthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview AT singhalsaurabh artificialintelligenceinthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview AT pateltapan artificialintelligenceinthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview AT kirchgesnerthomaspaulemile artificialintelligenceinthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview AT agnessalvatore artificialintelligenceinthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview AT annunziatasalvatore artificialintelligenceinthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview AT tregliagiorgio artificialintelligenceinthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview AT giovinazzofrancesco artificialintelligenceinthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview |