Cargando…
Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study
The current study aimed to assess the topographical and physical properties of a minimally invasive implant (MagiCore(®): MC(®), InnosBioSurg, IBS) and to evaluate its biological behavior compared to a gold standard implant (NobelParallel™: NB™, Nobel Biocare™). After surface characterization, the b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36363140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15217540 |
_version_ | 1784829247904284672 |
---|---|
author | Attik, Nina Phantarasmy, Marina Abouelleil, Hazem Chevalier, Charlène Barraco, Aurore Grosgogeat, Brigitte Lafon, Arnaud |
author_facet | Attik, Nina Phantarasmy, Marina Abouelleil, Hazem Chevalier, Charlène Barraco, Aurore Grosgogeat, Brigitte Lafon, Arnaud |
author_sort | Attik, Nina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current study aimed to assess the topographical and physical properties of a minimally invasive implant (MagiCore(®): MC(®), InnosBioSurg, IBS) and to evaluate its biological behavior compared to a gold standard implant (NobelParallel™: NB™, Nobel Biocare™). After surface characterization, the biological behavior assessment was conducted regarding human gingival fibroblasts (hGF) and osteoblast-like cells (MG63). Roughness values for NB(TM) were Ra = 1.28 µm and for MC(®) they were Ra = 2.02 µm. Alamar Blue(TM) assay LIVE/DEAD(TM) staining results indicated equivalent biological development regarding both cell types for the two implants. Significant enhancement was found for hGF ALP activity in the presence of the two tested implants in a time-dependent manner from day 7 to day 14 (** p < 0.01). Alizarin red staining demonstrated significant calcium deposition enhancement when cells were interfaced with the NB™ compared to the MC(®) implant (** p < 0.05). Moreover, SEM and confocal imaging revealed good cell adhesion with a denser cellular layer on the MC(®) than the NB™ surface. The MC(®) cytocompatibility was ranked as equivalent to the gold standard implant despite the surface properties differences. These findings provide new insights about the minimally invasive implant’s biological behavior and its potential clinical implication in different implantology situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9655689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96556892022-11-15 Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study Attik, Nina Phantarasmy, Marina Abouelleil, Hazem Chevalier, Charlène Barraco, Aurore Grosgogeat, Brigitte Lafon, Arnaud Materials (Basel) Article The current study aimed to assess the topographical and physical properties of a minimally invasive implant (MagiCore(®): MC(®), InnosBioSurg, IBS) and to evaluate its biological behavior compared to a gold standard implant (NobelParallel™: NB™, Nobel Biocare™). After surface characterization, the biological behavior assessment was conducted regarding human gingival fibroblasts (hGF) and osteoblast-like cells (MG63). Roughness values for NB(TM) were Ra = 1.28 µm and for MC(®) they were Ra = 2.02 µm. Alamar Blue(TM) assay LIVE/DEAD(TM) staining results indicated equivalent biological development regarding both cell types for the two implants. Significant enhancement was found for hGF ALP activity in the presence of the two tested implants in a time-dependent manner from day 7 to day 14 (** p < 0.01). Alizarin red staining demonstrated significant calcium deposition enhancement when cells were interfaced with the NB™ compared to the MC(®) implant (** p < 0.05). Moreover, SEM and confocal imaging revealed good cell adhesion with a denser cellular layer on the MC(®) than the NB™ surface. The MC(®) cytocompatibility was ranked as equivalent to the gold standard implant despite the surface properties differences. These findings provide new insights about the minimally invasive implant’s biological behavior and its potential clinical implication in different implantology situations. MDPI 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9655689/ /pubmed/36363140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15217540 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Attik, Nina Phantarasmy, Marina Abouelleil, Hazem Chevalier, Charlène Barraco, Aurore Grosgogeat, Brigitte Lafon, Arnaud Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study |
title | Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparison of the biological behavior and topographical surface assessment of a minimally invasive dental implant and a standard implant: an in vitro study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36363140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15217540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT attiknina comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy AT phantarasmymarina comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy AT abouelleilhazem comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy AT chevaliercharlene comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy AT barracoaurore comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy AT grosgogeatbrigitte comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy AT lafonarnaud comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy |