Cargando…

Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study

The current study aimed to assess the topographical and physical properties of a minimally invasive implant (MagiCore(®): MC(®), InnosBioSurg, IBS) and to evaluate its biological behavior compared to a gold standard implant (NobelParallel™: NB™, Nobel Biocare™). After surface characterization, the b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attik, Nina, Phantarasmy, Marina, Abouelleil, Hazem, Chevalier, Charlène, Barraco, Aurore, Grosgogeat, Brigitte, Lafon, Arnaud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36363140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15217540
_version_ 1784829247904284672
author Attik, Nina
Phantarasmy, Marina
Abouelleil, Hazem
Chevalier, Charlène
Barraco, Aurore
Grosgogeat, Brigitte
Lafon, Arnaud
author_facet Attik, Nina
Phantarasmy, Marina
Abouelleil, Hazem
Chevalier, Charlène
Barraco, Aurore
Grosgogeat, Brigitte
Lafon, Arnaud
author_sort Attik, Nina
collection PubMed
description The current study aimed to assess the topographical and physical properties of a minimally invasive implant (MagiCore(®): MC(®), InnosBioSurg, IBS) and to evaluate its biological behavior compared to a gold standard implant (NobelParallel™: NB™, Nobel Biocare™). After surface characterization, the biological behavior assessment was conducted regarding human gingival fibroblasts (hGF) and osteoblast-like cells (MG63). Roughness values for NB(TM) were Ra = 1.28 µm and for MC(®) they were Ra = 2.02 µm. Alamar Blue(TM) assay LIVE/DEAD(TM) staining results indicated equivalent biological development regarding both cell types for the two implants. Significant enhancement was found for hGF ALP activity in the presence of the two tested implants in a time-dependent manner from day 7 to day 14 (** p < 0.01). Alizarin red staining demonstrated significant calcium deposition enhancement when cells were interfaced with the NB™ compared to the MC(®) implant (** p < 0.05). Moreover, SEM and confocal imaging revealed good cell adhesion with a denser cellular layer on the MC(®) than the NB™ surface. The MC(®) cytocompatibility was ranked as equivalent to the gold standard implant despite the surface properties differences. These findings provide new insights about the minimally invasive implant’s biological behavior and its potential clinical implication in different implantology situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9655689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96556892022-11-15 Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study Attik, Nina Phantarasmy, Marina Abouelleil, Hazem Chevalier, Charlène Barraco, Aurore Grosgogeat, Brigitte Lafon, Arnaud Materials (Basel) Article The current study aimed to assess the topographical and physical properties of a minimally invasive implant (MagiCore(®): MC(®), InnosBioSurg, IBS) and to evaluate its biological behavior compared to a gold standard implant (NobelParallel™: NB™, Nobel Biocare™). After surface characterization, the biological behavior assessment was conducted regarding human gingival fibroblasts (hGF) and osteoblast-like cells (MG63). Roughness values for NB(TM) were Ra = 1.28 µm and for MC(®) they were Ra = 2.02 µm. Alamar Blue(TM) assay LIVE/DEAD(TM) staining results indicated equivalent biological development regarding both cell types for the two implants. Significant enhancement was found for hGF ALP activity in the presence of the two tested implants in a time-dependent manner from day 7 to day 14 (** p < 0.01). Alizarin red staining demonstrated significant calcium deposition enhancement when cells were interfaced with the NB™ compared to the MC(®) implant (** p < 0.05). Moreover, SEM and confocal imaging revealed good cell adhesion with a denser cellular layer on the MC(®) than the NB™ surface. The MC(®) cytocompatibility was ranked as equivalent to the gold standard implant despite the surface properties differences. These findings provide new insights about the minimally invasive implant’s biological behavior and its potential clinical implication in different implantology situations. MDPI 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9655689/ /pubmed/36363140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15217540 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Attik, Nina
Phantarasmy, Marina
Abouelleil, Hazem
Chevalier, Charlène
Barraco, Aurore
Grosgogeat, Brigitte
Lafon, Arnaud
Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study
title Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparison of the biological behavior and topographical surface assessment of a minimally invasive dental implant and a standard implant: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36363140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15217540
work_keys_str_mv AT attiknina comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy
AT phantarasmymarina comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy
AT abouelleilhazem comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy
AT chevaliercharlene comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy
AT barracoaurore comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy
AT grosgogeatbrigitte comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy
AT lafonarnaud comparisonofthebiologicalbehaviorandtopographicalsurfaceassessmentofaminimallyinvasivedentalimplantandastandardimplantaninvitrostudy