Cargando…

Effects of Valley Topography on Acoustic Communication in Birds: Why Do Birds Avoid Deep Valleys in Daqinggou Nature Reserve?

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Landscape structure may influence animal acoustic communication. Our playback experiments showed that the acoustic intensity and frequency of bird vocalizations differed between the upper and lower valley. Valley topography on acoustic communication could lead birds to avoid deep val...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Songkai, Wu, Wenhui, Liu, Yaxin, Kang, Xiaofang, Li, Chunwang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12212896
_version_ 1784829319336427520
author Guo, Songkai
Wu, Wenhui
Liu, Yaxin
Kang, Xiaofang
Li, Chunwang
author_facet Guo, Songkai
Wu, Wenhui
Liu, Yaxin
Kang, Xiaofang
Li, Chunwang
author_sort Guo, Songkai
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Landscape structure may influence animal acoustic communication. Our playback experiments showed that the acoustic intensity and frequency of bird vocalizations differed between the upper and lower valley. Valley topography on acoustic communication could lead birds to avoid deep valleys. ABSTRACT: To investigate the effects of valley topography on the acoustic transmission of avian vocalisations, we carried out playback experiments in Daqinggou valley, Inner Mongolia, China. During the experiments, we recorded the vocalisations of five avian species, the large-billed crow (Corvus macrorhynchos Wagler, 1827), common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus Linnaeus, 1758), Eurasian magpie (Pica pica Linnaeus, 1758), Eurasian tree sparrow (Passer montanus Linnaeus, 1758), and meadow bunting (Emberiza cioides Brand, 1843), at transmission distances of 30 m and 50 m in the upper and lower parts of the valley and analysed the intensity, the fundamental frequency (F0), and the first three formant frequencies (F1/F2/F3) of the sounds. We also investigated bird species diversity in the upper and lower valley. We found that: (1) at the distance of 30 m, there were significant differences in F0/F1/F2/F3 in Eurasian magpies, significant differences in F1/F2/F3 in the meadow bunting and Eurasian tree sparrow, and partially significant differences in sound frequency between the upper and lower valley in the other two species; (2) at the distance of 50 m, there were significant differences in F0/F1/F2/F3 in two avian species (large-billed crow and common cuckoo) between the upper and lower valley and partially significant differences in sound frequency between the upper and lower valley in the other three species; (2) there were significant differences in the acoustic intensities of crow, cuckoo, magpie, and bunting calls between the upper and lower valley. (3) Species number and richness were significantly higher in the upper valley than in the lower valley. We suggested that the structure of valley habitats may lead to the breakdown of acoustic signals and communication in birds to varying degrees. The effect of valley topography on acoustic communication could be one reason for animal species avoiding deep valleys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9655978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96559782022-11-15 Effects of Valley Topography on Acoustic Communication in Birds: Why Do Birds Avoid Deep Valleys in Daqinggou Nature Reserve? Guo, Songkai Wu, Wenhui Liu, Yaxin Kang, Xiaofang Li, Chunwang Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Landscape structure may influence animal acoustic communication. Our playback experiments showed that the acoustic intensity and frequency of bird vocalizations differed between the upper and lower valley. Valley topography on acoustic communication could lead birds to avoid deep valleys. ABSTRACT: To investigate the effects of valley topography on the acoustic transmission of avian vocalisations, we carried out playback experiments in Daqinggou valley, Inner Mongolia, China. During the experiments, we recorded the vocalisations of five avian species, the large-billed crow (Corvus macrorhynchos Wagler, 1827), common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus Linnaeus, 1758), Eurasian magpie (Pica pica Linnaeus, 1758), Eurasian tree sparrow (Passer montanus Linnaeus, 1758), and meadow bunting (Emberiza cioides Brand, 1843), at transmission distances of 30 m and 50 m in the upper and lower parts of the valley and analysed the intensity, the fundamental frequency (F0), and the first three formant frequencies (F1/F2/F3) of the sounds. We also investigated bird species diversity in the upper and lower valley. We found that: (1) at the distance of 30 m, there were significant differences in F0/F1/F2/F3 in Eurasian magpies, significant differences in F1/F2/F3 in the meadow bunting and Eurasian tree sparrow, and partially significant differences in sound frequency between the upper and lower valley in the other two species; (2) at the distance of 50 m, there were significant differences in F0/F1/F2/F3 in two avian species (large-billed crow and common cuckoo) between the upper and lower valley and partially significant differences in sound frequency between the upper and lower valley in the other three species; (2) there were significant differences in the acoustic intensities of crow, cuckoo, magpie, and bunting calls between the upper and lower valley. (3) Species number and richness were significantly higher in the upper valley than in the lower valley. We suggested that the structure of valley habitats may lead to the breakdown of acoustic signals and communication in birds to varying degrees. The effect of valley topography on acoustic communication could be one reason for animal species avoiding deep valleys. MDPI 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9655978/ /pubmed/36359019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12212896 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guo, Songkai
Wu, Wenhui
Liu, Yaxin
Kang, Xiaofang
Li, Chunwang
Effects of Valley Topography on Acoustic Communication in Birds: Why Do Birds Avoid Deep Valleys in Daqinggou Nature Reserve?
title Effects of Valley Topography on Acoustic Communication in Birds: Why Do Birds Avoid Deep Valleys in Daqinggou Nature Reserve?
title_full Effects of Valley Topography on Acoustic Communication in Birds: Why Do Birds Avoid Deep Valleys in Daqinggou Nature Reserve?
title_fullStr Effects of Valley Topography on Acoustic Communication in Birds: Why Do Birds Avoid Deep Valleys in Daqinggou Nature Reserve?
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Valley Topography on Acoustic Communication in Birds: Why Do Birds Avoid Deep Valleys in Daqinggou Nature Reserve?
title_short Effects of Valley Topography on Acoustic Communication in Birds: Why Do Birds Avoid Deep Valleys in Daqinggou Nature Reserve?
title_sort effects of valley topography on acoustic communication in birds: why do birds avoid deep valleys in daqinggou nature reserve?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12212896
work_keys_str_mv AT guosongkai effectsofvalleytopographyonacousticcommunicationinbirdswhydobirdsavoiddeepvalleysindaqinggounaturereserve
AT wuwenhui effectsofvalleytopographyonacousticcommunicationinbirdswhydobirdsavoiddeepvalleysindaqinggounaturereserve
AT liuyaxin effectsofvalleytopographyonacousticcommunicationinbirdswhydobirdsavoiddeepvalleysindaqinggounaturereserve
AT kangxiaofang effectsofvalleytopographyonacousticcommunicationinbirdswhydobirdsavoiddeepvalleysindaqinggounaturereserve
AT lichunwang effectsofvalleytopographyonacousticcommunicationinbirdswhydobirdsavoiddeepvalleysindaqinggounaturereserve