Cargando…

Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults

The assessment of movement reaction time (RT) as a sideline assessment is a valuable biomarker for mild TBI or concussion. However, such assessments require controlled laboratory environments, which may not be feasible for sideline testing during a game. Body-worn wearable devices are advantageous a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harper, Brent, Shiraishi, Michael, Soangra, Rahul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36366253
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218555
_version_ 1784829410359115776
author Harper, Brent
Shiraishi, Michael
Soangra, Rahul
author_facet Harper, Brent
Shiraishi, Michael
Soangra, Rahul
author_sort Harper, Brent
collection PubMed
description The assessment of movement reaction time (RT) as a sideline assessment is a valuable biomarker for mild TBI or concussion. However, such assessments require controlled laboratory environments, which may not be feasible for sideline testing during a game. Body-worn wearable devices are advantageous as being cost-effective, easy to don and use, wirelessly transmit data, and ensure unhindered movement performance. This study aimed to develop a Drop-stick Test System (DTS) with a wireless inertial sensor and confirm its reliability for different standing conditions (Foam versus No Foam) and task types (Single versus Dual), and postures (Standing versus sitting). Fourteen healthy young participants (seven females, seven males; age 24.7 ± 2.6 years) participated in this study. The participants were asked to catch a falling stick attached to the sensor during a drop test. Reaction Times (RTs) were calculated from data for each trial from DTS and laboratory camera system (gold standard). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3,k) were computed to determine inter-instrument reliability. The RT measurements from participants using the camera system and sensor-based DTS showed moderate to good inter-instrument reliability with an overall ICC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.78–0.85). Bland–Altman plots and 95% levels of agreement revealed a bias where the DTS underestimated RT by approximately 50 ms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9656344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96563442022-11-15 Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults Harper, Brent Shiraishi, Michael Soangra, Rahul Sensors (Basel) Article The assessment of movement reaction time (RT) as a sideline assessment is a valuable biomarker for mild TBI or concussion. However, such assessments require controlled laboratory environments, which may not be feasible for sideline testing during a game. Body-worn wearable devices are advantageous as being cost-effective, easy to don and use, wirelessly transmit data, and ensure unhindered movement performance. This study aimed to develop a Drop-stick Test System (DTS) with a wireless inertial sensor and confirm its reliability for different standing conditions (Foam versus No Foam) and task types (Single versus Dual), and postures (Standing versus sitting). Fourteen healthy young participants (seven females, seven males; age 24.7 ± 2.6 years) participated in this study. The participants were asked to catch a falling stick attached to the sensor during a drop test. Reaction Times (RTs) were calculated from data for each trial from DTS and laboratory camera system (gold standard). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3,k) were computed to determine inter-instrument reliability. The RT measurements from participants using the camera system and sensor-based DTS showed moderate to good inter-instrument reliability with an overall ICC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.78–0.85). Bland–Altman plots and 95% levels of agreement revealed a bias where the DTS underestimated RT by approximately 50 ms. MDPI 2022-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9656344/ /pubmed/36366253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218555 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Harper, Brent
Shiraishi, Michael
Soangra, Rahul
Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults
title Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults
title_full Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults
title_short Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults
title_sort reliability and validity of inertial sensor assisted reaction time measurement tools among healthy young adults
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36366253
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218555
work_keys_str_mv AT harperbrent reliabilityandvalidityofinertialsensorassistedreactiontimemeasurementtoolsamonghealthyyoungadults
AT shiraishimichael reliabilityandvalidityofinertialsensorassistedreactiontimemeasurementtoolsamonghealthyyoungadults
AT soangrarahul reliabilityandvalidityofinertialsensorassistedreactiontimemeasurementtoolsamonghealthyyoungadults