Cargando…
Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults
The assessment of movement reaction time (RT) as a sideline assessment is a valuable biomarker for mild TBI or concussion. However, such assessments require controlled laboratory environments, which may not be feasible for sideline testing during a game. Body-worn wearable devices are advantageous a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36366253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218555 |
_version_ | 1784829410359115776 |
---|---|
author | Harper, Brent Shiraishi, Michael Soangra, Rahul |
author_facet | Harper, Brent Shiraishi, Michael Soangra, Rahul |
author_sort | Harper, Brent |
collection | PubMed |
description | The assessment of movement reaction time (RT) as a sideline assessment is a valuable biomarker for mild TBI or concussion. However, such assessments require controlled laboratory environments, which may not be feasible for sideline testing during a game. Body-worn wearable devices are advantageous as being cost-effective, easy to don and use, wirelessly transmit data, and ensure unhindered movement performance. This study aimed to develop a Drop-stick Test System (DTS) with a wireless inertial sensor and confirm its reliability for different standing conditions (Foam versus No Foam) and task types (Single versus Dual), and postures (Standing versus sitting). Fourteen healthy young participants (seven females, seven males; age 24.7 ± 2.6 years) participated in this study. The participants were asked to catch a falling stick attached to the sensor during a drop test. Reaction Times (RTs) were calculated from data for each trial from DTS and laboratory camera system (gold standard). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3,k) were computed to determine inter-instrument reliability. The RT measurements from participants using the camera system and sensor-based DTS showed moderate to good inter-instrument reliability with an overall ICC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.78–0.85). Bland–Altman plots and 95% levels of agreement revealed a bias where the DTS underestimated RT by approximately 50 ms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9656344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96563442022-11-15 Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults Harper, Brent Shiraishi, Michael Soangra, Rahul Sensors (Basel) Article The assessment of movement reaction time (RT) as a sideline assessment is a valuable biomarker for mild TBI or concussion. However, such assessments require controlled laboratory environments, which may not be feasible for sideline testing during a game. Body-worn wearable devices are advantageous as being cost-effective, easy to don and use, wirelessly transmit data, and ensure unhindered movement performance. This study aimed to develop a Drop-stick Test System (DTS) with a wireless inertial sensor and confirm its reliability for different standing conditions (Foam versus No Foam) and task types (Single versus Dual), and postures (Standing versus sitting). Fourteen healthy young participants (seven females, seven males; age 24.7 ± 2.6 years) participated in this study. The participants were asked to catch a falling stick attached to the sensor during a drop test. Reaction Times (RTs) were calculated from data for each trial from DTS and laboratory camera system (gold standard). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3,k) were computed to determine inter-instrument reliability. The RT measurements from participants using the camera system and sensor-based DTS showed moderate to good inter-instrument reliability with an overall ICC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.78–0.85). Bland–Altman plots and 95% levels of agreement revealed a bias where the DTS underestimated RT by approximately 50 ms. MDPI 2022-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9656344/ /pubmed/36366253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218555 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Harper, Brent Shiraishi, Michael Soangra, Rahul Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults |
title | Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults |
title_full | Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults |
title_short | Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults |
title_sort | reliability and validity of inertial sensor assisted reaction time measurement tools among healthy young adults |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36366253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harperbrent reliabilityandvalidityofinertialsensorassistedreactiontimemeasurementtoolsamonghealthyyoungadults AT shiraishimichael reliabilityandvalidityofinertialsensorassistedreactiontimemeasurementtoolsamonghealthyyoungadults AT soangrarahul reliabilityandvalidityofinertialsensorassistedreactiontimemeasurementtoolsamonghealthyyoungadults |