Cargando…
Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
Post-stroke, in addition to sensorimotor signs and symptoms, could lead to cognitive deficits. Theories of embodiment stress the role of sensorimotor system and multisensory integration in sustaining high-order cognitive domains. Despite conventional post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation being effect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216324 |
_version_ | 1784829427631259648 |
---|---|
author | Parisi, Alessandra Bellinzona, Francesca Di Lernia, Daniele Repetto, Claudia De Gaspari, Stefano Brizzi, Giulia Riva, Giuseppe Tuena, Cosimo |
author_facet | Parisi, Alessandra Bellinzona, Francesca Di Lernia, Daniele Repetto, Claudia De Gaspari, Stefano Brizzi, Giulia Riva, Giuseppe Tuena, Cosimo |
author_sort | Parisi, Alessandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Post-stroke, in addition to sensorimotor signs and symptoms, could lead to cognitive deficits. Theories of embodiment stress the role of sensorimotor system and multisensory integration in sustaining high-order cognitive domains. Despite conventional post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation being effective, innovative technologies could overcome some limitations of standard interventions and exploit bodily information during cognitive rehabilitation. This systematic review aims to investigate whether ‘multisensory technologies’ compared to usual care treatment can be a viable alternative for cognitive rehabilitation. By applying PRISMA guidelines, we extracted data and assessed the bias of 10 studies that met the required criteria. We found that multisensory technologies were at least comparable to standard treatment but particularly effective for attention, spatial cognition, global cognition, and memory. Multisensory technologies consisted principally of virtual reality alone or combined with a motion tracking system. Multisensory technologies without motion tracking were more effective than standard procedures, whereas those with motion tracking showed balanced results for the two treatments. Limitations of the included studies regarded the population (e.g., no study on acute stroke), assessment (e.g., lack of multimodal/multisensory pre-post evaluation), and methodology (e.g., sample size, blinding bias). Recent advancements in technological development and metaverse open new opportunities to design embodied rehabilitative programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9656411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96564112022-11-15 Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review Parisi, Alessandra Bellinzona, Francesca Di Lernia, Daniele Repetto, Claudia De Gaspari, Stefano Brizzi, Giulia Riva, Giuseppe Tuena, Cosimo J Clin Med Review Post-stroke, in addition to sensorimotor signs and symptoms, could lead to cognitive deficits. Theories of embodiment stress the role of sensorimotor system and multisensory integration in sustaining high-order cognitive domains. Despite conventional post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation being effective, innovative technologies could overcome some limitations of standard interventions and exploit bodily information during cognitive rehabilitation. This systematic review aims to investigate whether ‘multisensory technologies’ compared to usual care treatment can be a viable alternative for cognitive rehabilitation. By applying PRISMA guidelines, we extracted data and assessed the bias of 10 studies that met the required criteria. We found that multisensory technologies were at least comparable to standard treatment but particularly effective for attention, spatial cognition, global cognition, and memory. Multisensory technologies consisted principally of virtual reality alone or combined with a motion tracking system. Multisensory technologies without motion tracking were more effective than standard procedures, whereas those with motion tracking showed balanced results for the two treatments. Limitations of the included studies regarded the population (e.g., no study on acute stroke), assessment (e.g., lack of multimodal/multisensory pre-post evaluation), and methodology (e.g., sample size, blinding bias). Recent advancements in technological development and metaverse open new opportunities to design embodied rehabilitative programs. MDPI 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9656411/ /pubmed/36362551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216324 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Parisi, Alessandra Bellinzona, Francesca Di Lernia, Daniele Repetto, Claudia De Gaspari, Stefano Brizzi, Giulia Riva, Giuseppe Tuena, Cosimo Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review |
title | Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | efficacy of multisensory technology in post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parisialessandra efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview AT bellinzonafrancesca efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview AT dilerniadaniele efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview AT repettoclaudia efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview AT degasparistefano efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview AT brizzigiulia efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview AT rivagiuseppe efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview AT tuenacosimo efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview |