Cargando…

Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review

Post-stroke, in addition to sensorimotor signs and symptoms, could lead to cognitive deficits. Theories of embodiment stress the role of sensorimotor system and multisensory integration in sustaining high-order cognitive domains. Despite conventional post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation being effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parisi, Alessandra, Bellinzona, Francesca, Di Lernia, Daniele, Repetto, Claudia, De Gaspari, Stefano, Brizzi, Giulia, Riva, Giuseppe, Tuena, Cosimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216324
_version_ 1784829427631259648
author Parisi, Alessandra
Bellinzona, Francesca
Di Lernia, Daniele
Repetto, Claudia
De Gaspari, Stefano
Brizzi, Giulia
Riva, Giuseppe
Tuena, Cosimo
author_facet Parisi, Alessandra
Bellinzona, Francesca
Di Lernia, Daniele
Repetto, Claudia
De Gaspari, Stefano
Brizzi, Giulia
Riva, Giuseppe
Tuena, Cosimo
author_sort Parisi, Alessandra
collection PubMed
description Post-stroke, in addition to sensorimotor signs and symptoms, could lead to cognitive deficits. Theories of embodiment stress the role of sensorimotor system and multisensory integration in sustaining high-order cognitive domains. Despite conventional post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation being effective, innovative technologies could overcome some limitations of standard interventions and exploit bodily information during cognitive rehabilitation. This systematic review aims to investigate whether ‘multisensory technologies’ compared to usual care treatment can be a viable alternative for cognitive rehabilitation. By applying PRISMA guidelines, we extracted data and assessed the bias of 10 studies that met the required criteria. We found that multisensory technologies were at least comparable to standard treatment but particularly effective for attention, spatial cognition, global cognition, and memory. Multisensory technologies consisted principally of virtual reality alone or combined with a motion tracking system. Multisensory technologies without motion tracking were more effective than standard procedures, whereas those with motion tracking showed balanced results for the two treatments. Limitations of the included studies regarded the population (e.g., no study on acute stroke), assessment (e.g., lack of multimodal/multisensory pre-post evaluation), and methodology (e.g., sample size, blinding bias). Recent advancements in technological development and metaverse open new opportunities to design embodied rehabilitative programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9656411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96564112022-11-15 Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review Parisi, Alessandra Bellinzona, Francesca Di Lernia, Daniele Repetto, Claudia De Gaspari, Stefano Brizzi, Giulia Riva, Giuseppe Tuena, Cosimo J Clin Med Review Post-stroke, in addition to sensorimotor signs and symptoms, could lead to cognitive deficits. Theories of embodiment stress the role of sensorimotor system and multisensory integration in sustaining high-order cognitive domains. Despite conventional post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation being effective, innovative technologies could overcome some limitations of standard interventions and exploit bodily information during cognitive rehabilitation. This systematic review aims to investigate whether ‘multisensory technologies’ compared to usual care treatment can be a viable alternative for cognitive rehabilitation. By applying PRISMA guidelines, we extracted data and assessed the bias of 10 studies that met the required criteria. We found that multisensory technologies were at least comparable to standard treatment but particularly effective for attention, spatial cognition, global cognition, and memory. Multisensory technologies consisted principally of virtual reality alone or combined with a motion tracking system. Multisensory technologies without motion tracking were more effective than standard procedures, whereas those with motion tracking showed balanced results for the two treatments. Limitations of the included studies regarded the population (e.g., no study on acute stroke), assessment (e.g., lack of multimodal/multisensory pre-post evaluation), and methodology (e.g., sample size, blinding bias). Recent advancements in technological development and metaverse open new opportunities to design embodied rehabilitative programs. MDPI 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9656411/ /pubmed/36362551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216324 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Parisi, Alessandra
Bellinzona, Francesca
Di Lernia, Daniele
Repetto, Claudia
De Gaspari, Stefano
Brizzi, Giulia
Riva, Giuseppe
Tuena, Cosimo
Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
title Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
title_full Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
title_short Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
title_sort efficacy of multisensory technology in post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216324
work_keys_str_mv AT parisialessandra efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview
AT bellinzonafrancesca efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview
AT dilerniadaniele efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview
AT repettoclaudia efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview
AT degasparistefano efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview
AT brizzigiulia efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview
AT rivagiuseppe efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview
AT tuenacosimo efficacyofmultisensorytechnologyinpoststrokecognitiverehabilitationasystematicreview